This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
gloryhunter EDINBURGH 14 Sep 17 1.22pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Charlie Croker
Or - Burnley accepted Chungy's gift, sat back on a lead, defended exceptionally well, had some luck, and allowed us space and time on the ball. Had that been us sitting on a 1-0 lead after 3 minutes, we'd have made an average side look good as well. Don't get me wrong, we played better in that formation, but I don't think it was necessarily them 'playing for the manager'. I wasn't ever enthused by FdB, nor am I by RH - but if he gets us to 40 points (or whatever 17 place needs this year) and doesn't p!ss off in pre-season we can look to build properly in Summer 2018. My main gripes through all of this is that 1) we always seem to leave it late in transfer windows - next season will need to be better given that it closes earlier, 2) we seem to be one of the few clubs that states (and worries about) FFP as a reason not to spend a bit more on players, 3) another manager merry-go-round this time does give SP and us a reputation, and means that after RH's tenure we might find it difficult to attract someone else. Still, I'll be there on Saturday hoping for a change in fortunes - or at the very least a league goal! The size of the payoff that managers get these days will ensure that we will always find someone decent for hire.
gloryhunter (eagle in exile) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 14 Sep 17 1.29pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
We have heard nothing except media rumours that may or may not be true and Parish may well have been there but he hasn't said that "Frank lied in his interviews to the board" as you have claimed How many times? He promised ''gradual'' and 'results over style'' and went back on his word. Then there was the 3-4-3 debacle. All could've been tried over 2-3 windows like any sensible manager or sane person before any experience but he ploughed ahead to put himself in a risky position. Any more times?
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Maine Eagle USA 14 Sep 17 2.26pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by bicycle repair man
Frank wasn't sacked just because of results on the pitch.The man was a loose cannon,who once the season started realised he was out of his depth,and began to use training methods that isolated players,and bordered on bullying. When did we become a team, and when did this league become so utterly soft. What do you think Clough and Fergie did to their players? Player power is out of control in today's game and its particularly crazy at our club if certain players go crawling to Parish after a few games and start trying to undermine and fire a manager. As a manager I dont think you should walk in with a game plan to cause rifts in the squad but we have gone awfully soft if the manager of our team cant even use discipline and exert his authority in the way that he sees fit. Parish is enabling that nonsense and now if someone is remotely unhappy with Roy - why not go to the press or go crawling to Parish to undermine and destabilize him - its toxic.
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 14 Sep 17 2.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
When did we become a team, and when did this league become so utterly soft. What do you think Clough and Fergie did to their players? Player power is out of control in today's game and its particularly crazy at our club if certain players go crawling to Parish after a few games and start trying to undermine and fire a manager. As a manager I dont think you should walk in with a game plan to cause rifts in the squad but we have gone awfully soft if the manager of our team cant even use discipline and exert his authority in the way that he sees fit. Parish is enabling that nonsense and now if someone is remotely unhappy with Roy - why not go to the press or go crawling to Parish to undermine and destabilize him - its toxic. I've said this before. I think managers that get a response from their players are able to put an arm round them. Not come in, expect them to deliver what they can't because they're 6 players short, p1ss people off, then invite them back in a day or a week later because you've realised you do need them after all. It's not only the bad players he's affected. What about Luka? Maybe he went to Delaney, or directly to Parish? Maybe that wasn't leaked and only the poor players were. Actually he wouldn't need to. Glaringly obvious Frank fvcked Luka pre season and start of season into a quarter of the player he was. Zaha's try at a clever message on twitter of 4-3-3 seems to have escaped attention. You can criticise the board and the players as well as Frank but there's one thing they will do, and that's fight to stay in this league. They just need the right manager to do it who knows how to implement it. And while you're talking Cloughie, have you ever seen 'The Damned United'? Frank isn't that different to that. Just different time and tactics out and in.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
kev64 Cambs 14 Sep 17 2.55pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mstrobez
So there's a rumour he alienated 3 players, weirdly all 3 who are not deemed good enough by the majority of Palace fans. Throwing their toys out of the pram because 3 PL players can't adapt to a system that actually requires a bit of thought and technical skill. Funny how 3 defenders of their ability seem to know so much more than a defender with the career of Franks. "Weirdo" was the word quoted, how completely and utterly pathetic does that sound? Poor millionaire players "awienated", bless em. Maybe the players need to man up a bit. Absolutely amazing times we live in when Martin Kelly can get Frank de Boer the sack. Rumours are also Parish is a control freak and an ego maniac who went above his head in transfer dealings, refused to back him with his targets because he was assigning the majority of the budget to Sakho and then ironically telling him what tactics he should be implementing. The above just goes to show the value of basing assumptions on rumours. All we can do is go by facts - and the fact is unless Frank de Boer tried to shag all of the players wives, Parish really has no excuse for getting rid of him in the period of time that he did, especially after the performance vs Burnley. The fact as I understand he made JW sit out if pre season to watch how RWB was supposed to be played by AT who has never played in that position and was not happy with it. Told JW he was up for sale Friday before the game then played him as RWB !!! Ffs that's an inspirational piece of management, put him in the shop window to fail to show SP how bad he is. JW and other senior players are a reason the team stayed in the PL regardless of not being world beaters, football is a team game and if you alienate the team for your own ego the you shouldn't be in the job.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 14 Sep 17 3.07pm | |
---|---|
The amount of people bemoaning Parish for sacking FDB is ridonkulous, the same people moaned at SP for not venting AP sooner than he did. Maybe he saw certain similarities, realised he made a mistake and thought "not this time". I would like to point out, before you get all frothy at the mouth, that I to think the clubs management of transfers is beyond pathetic and reeks of panick buying, 28 million for Benteke ? and even worse 28 million for a defender that's not even fit enough to play. My point is a combined fee of nearly 60 million for Sakho and Benteke is very much Panick buying, and the only reason can be a piss poor scouting network and an utterly unfit for purpose transfer policy, and the buck for that stops with Parish, and in my book we have learnt nothing since the Hollaway debacle and that is the Boards fault. However FDB was not the one. Everyone keeps going on about how well we played against Burnley....So fckin what it was Burnley not a team we should be losing to, as were Huddersfield, and Swansea. Yes we were better, but we could hardly be any worse than against Huddersfield and Swansea. You can't seriously tell me that in all honesty, if we still had BFS as manager that we would have lost to Huddersfield, Swansea, or Burnley and it is feasible that we could have walked away from Anfield with a point, instead we have sweet f*** all points and the same amount of goals. First team since 1926 to not score in the top flight in their first 4 league games. So in summary then: Parish made a mistake, then rectified it. FDB poor man management and even poorer results.
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 14 Sep 17 3.30pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dannyh
You can't seriously tell me that in all honesty, if we still had BFS as manager that we would have lost to Huddersfield, Swansea, or Burnley I seem to recall that when we had Sam Allardyce as manager we did lose to Swansea and Burnley
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 14 Sep 17 4.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
I seem to recall that when we had Sam Allardyce as manager we did lose to Swansea and Burnley After 10 weeks+ planning he wouldn't have. Instead Frank invited his opponents to watch and plan for his irresponsible shambles he couldn't deliver.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 14 Sep 17 4.27pm | |
---|---|
I think that you just argue for the sake of it. Sam became manager on 23rd December and we got beaten by Burnley on 29th April which according to my calculator is more than 10 weeks planning time
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 14 Sep 17 4.37pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
I think that you just argue for the sake of it. Sam became manager on 23rd December and we got beaten by Burnley on 29th April which according to my calculator is more than 10 weeks planning time I'm talking about not losing 4 in a row, to nil. We had similar arguments with some members saying under Pardew we had no right to beat Burnley, hull, Swansea, any others. Well we shouldn't be losing to all of them and others. Anyway, situation was this: Sam had to undo the squad that was Pardewed. When Frank took over he had pre season to prepare and a couple of holes to fill, and no pressure of prem results at the time to get it done. What Frank decided to do was create 6-7 holes to fill and play a handful of them in positions they wouldn't play in the league, thus damaging their performance, links in the team along with others who can't deliver in it anyway. You must know all this. Maybe you don't see it or want to.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 14 Sep 17 4.51pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
I'm talking about not losing 4 in a row, to nil. You must know all this. Maybe you don't see it or want to. You weren't talking about losing four in a row at all but you seem to think that if you chuck in a mild insult people won't notice. dannyh stated "You can't seriously tell me that in all honesty, if we still had BFS as manager that we would have lost to Huddersfield, Swansea, or Burnley" I responded "I seem to recall that when we had Sam Allardyce as manager we did lose to Swansea and Burnley" You butted in to say "After 10 weeks+ planning he wouldn't have." I responded "Sam became manager on 23rd December and we got beaten by Burnley on 29th April which according to my calculator is more than 10 weeks planning time" You then tried to move the goalposts by pretending that you were arguing about something else. As I said, I think that you just argue for the sake of it
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mstrobez 14 Sep 17 6.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
You weren't talking about losing four in a row at all but you seem to think that if you chuck in a mild insult people won't notice. dannyh stated "You can't seriously tell me that in all honesty, if we still had BFS as manager that we would have lost to Huddersfield, Swansea, or Burnley" I responded "I seem to recall that when we had Sam Allardyce as manager we did lose to Swansea and Burnley" You butted in to say "After 10 weeks+ planning he wouldn't have." I responded "Sam became manager on 23rd December and we got beaten by Burnley on 29th April which according to my calculator is more than 10 weeks planning time" You then tried to move the goalposts by pretending that you were arguing about something else. As I said, I think that you just argue for the sake of it Allardyces first 7 games in charge; Watford 1-1 Palace Palace 1-2 Swansea Bolton 0-0 Palace (league cup) West Ham 3-0 Palace Palace 2-1 Bolton (league cup) Palace 0-1 Everton Palace 0-3 City But that's okay becsuse he's English and "knows the premier league init!" Although I remember some seriously suggesting at the start of his reign that he had taken the club to lower than Pardew depths. In my opinion it's a lot more to do with being opposed to a different culture of football than many would like to admit. All this nonsense that foreign managers don't work but that theory has been obliterated too many times now for it to really be taken seriously.
We're the Arthur over ere! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.