This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Kermit8 Hevon 10 Sep 17 9.20am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Dave58
Many of the people who wanted to remain, did not vote. Sadly especially young people who think politics isn't cool. Well they woke up and voted in the general election. This is the kind of ill-judged arrogance that if replicated by our negotiating team will see Brexit being destructive and long term at that for the UK.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
snytaxx London 10 Sep 17 9.39am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Kermit8
It is yes. And surely anyone with a rational brain from either side can see all in not well and the situation is pretty negative so not a question of 'told you so' more a wake up call for those who might be able to help steer the ship into calmer waters and take over the wheel from the lunatic foaming Brexiteer right wingers. No I dont think the situation really is that negative however i'm not surprised at this narrative you are pushing, here's why. The referendum was very much the remain camp's result 'to lose'. It should of fought a campaign about the reasons why the EU is so totally wonderful, aspects of the campaign did that. i.e. Nicola Sturgeon and Will Straw however many in the campaign just tried using negative campaigning such as fear mongering and smear politics to try and win. e.g. Cameron, Osbourne, Blair, Obama, Eagle etc. Surprisingly to many of the aforementioned (yet not to me) the electorate rejected not just the EU, but the whole climate / tone of the debate and we had a leave victory with a million votes to spare. The problem was, except a crash in the pound (which has both advantaged and disadvantaged our country), almost nothing the remain campaign said would happen, has actually happened. I.e. Where are the 500,000 redundancies which were supposed to come about the moment the decision was made to leave? Where is the emergency budget? Where is the peace in Europe threatened? Where is the Recession? Have Scotland and NI broken away from the UK? The way I see it, the electorate called the remain campaigns bluff and many politicians and remain supporters have lost ALOT of face over it. This is the part which really saddens me, some in the remain campaign have simply said "I dont agree with the direction we are headed, but unity and democracy are more important, we respect the decision, "to leave" while others, have either directly or implicitly put their own reputations ahead of what the country needs (unity) and have pushed this narrative that 'the wheels are coming off' even though it isnt true, effectively a double or nothing approach. Sadly, when i read your posts I genuinely get the impression that you'd rather the whole country 'self destruct' so you can stand proudly on top of the piled up ruins of UK society and proclaim "I TOLD YOU SO" rather than the UK actually leave the EU and you know... try and make a good go of it. Now before you rage back at me i'm certain that is not the case and that you would like to see the UK thrive after brexit, but it rather encompasses my point. We have words such as 'extreme, cliff edge, self destruct, hard, dangerous' (normally followed by 'brexit') banded around like candy at a kids party, however very little explanation as to why you use these words and what exactly has happened to merit use these words? Sure, i'm certain if you google hard enough you can find some member of Goldman Sachs saying "i'm moving to Paris" or a Japanese bank instead considering Frankfurt as its European HQ instead of London. However minor gains and losses don't equate to 'driving off a cliff edge' it's just a narrative your side needs to keep pushing because coming to terms with the fact that your campaign was wrong is just too painful to bear.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 10 Sep 17 9.43am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by matt_himself
All that is missing from your hackneyed, patronising piece, designed to make yourself feel superior, is the oft mentioned Bremoaner position that the general public as 'too thick' to make a decision of such magnitude. I am afraid Bert, that the reasons for Brexit are probably not obvious to those whom cosy themselves in nice little middle class enclaves, whom have a nice, 'Uncle Tom' relationship with the limited number of migrants they encountered and have only had a positive relationship with globalisation, such as cheaper goods & nice holidays. You and others on here are shining examples for the reasons Brexit happened and it is very telling that, rather than listening and acting upon the result in a positive manner, you are patronising, snidey and keen to derail the result through undemocratic processes. Totally agree Matt. I am happy to admit that I voted to leave, which was my right. Those that voted to remain, that was their right. That is called Democracy (or so I thought). I am sick of being told by politicians that I am too stupid to really understand what I voted for. I profess to not being the cleverest man that ever walked the earth but I am not stupid. In the job I recently retired from I saw, on a daily basis, one of the down sides of the EU...did this help me to decide? of course it did. Just look at the attitude of the EU towards us now, the hold us in complete contempt for having the audacity to hold a democratic vote.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
elgrande bedford 10 Sep 17 9.47am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by snytaxx
No I dont think the situation really is that negative however i'm not surprised at this narrative you are pushing, here's why. The referendum was very much the remain camp's result 'to lose'. It should of fought a campaign about the reasons why the EU is so totally wonderful, aspects of the campaign did that. i.e. Nicola Sturge huhnon and Will Straw however many in the campaign just tried using negative campaigning such as fear mongering and smear politics to try and win. e.g. Cameron, Osbourne, Blair, Obama, Eagle etc. Surprisingly to many of the aforementioned (yet not to me) the electorate rejected not just the EU, but the whole climate / tone of the debate and we had a leave victory with a million votes to spare. The problem was, except a crash in the pound (which has both advantaged and disadvantaged our country), almost nothing the remain campaign said would happen, has actually happened. I.e. Where are the 500,000 redundancies which were supposed to come about the moment the decision was made to leave? Where is the emergency budget? Where is the peace in Europe threatened? Where is the Recession? Have Scotland and NI broken away from the UK? The way I see it, the electorate called the remain campaigns bluff and many politicians and remain supporters have lost ALOT of face over it. This is the part which really saddens me, some in the remain campaign have simply said "I dont agree with the direction we are headed, but unity and democracy are more important, we respect the decision, "to leave" while others, have either directly or implicitly put their own reputations ahead of what the country needs (unity) and have pushed this narrative that 'the wheels are coming off' even though it isnt true, effectively a double or nothing approach. Sadly, when i read your posts I genuinely get the impression that you'd rather the whole country 'self destruct' so you can stand proudly on top of the piled up ruins of UK society and proclaim "I TOLD YOU SO" rather than the UK actually leave the EU and you know... try and make a good go of it. Now before you rage back at me i'm certain that is not the case and that you would like to see the UK thrive after brexit, but it rather encompasses my point. We have words such as 'extreme, cliff edge, self destruct, hard, dangerous' (normally followed by 'brexit') banded around like candy at a kids party, however very little explanation as to why you use these words and what exactly has happened to merit use these words? Sure, i'm certain if you google hard enough you can find some member of Goldman Sachs saying "i'm moving to Paris" or a Japanese bank instead considering Frankfurt as its European HQ instead of London. However minor gains and losses don't equate to 'driving off a cliff edge' it's just a narrative your side needs to keep pushing because coming to terms with the fact that your campaign was wrong is just too painful to bear. Very well put.
always a Norwood boy, where ever I live. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 10 Sep 17 9.49am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Note to the marchers. The 2010 Tory party manifesto included a pledge to hold a referendum. The Tories won the election so they had a mandate from the people. We held a referendum and we voted out. In the 2017 general election both Tory and Labour party manifestos had commitments which respected the referendum result and or were pro Brexit. The Lib Dems were the only major party to have a pro EU manifesto and they only received 7.4% of the vote. If you want to hold a second referendum you need a mandate? Why did you not vote Lib Dem? My second point relates to remainers who claim that leavers have unrealistic expectations regarding the negotiations. The Labour party are now saying they would remain in the single market and Tony Blair has just said we can control immigration within the EU. Neither of these 2 things are on offer from the EU so this is just as unrealistic as leavers saying we will live in a land of milk and honey. I voted leave because I believe that our parliament and courts should be supreme. I never again want to hear a minster or judge say they are bound by a decision of an external body. We need to hold our politicians to account and not let them hide behind the skirts of the EU. After Brexit I do not think it will be plain sailing and mistakes will be made. However, we the people will have the choice to change the government if they screw up and yes we could have a second referendum if that is the will of the people. Sadly you will be disappointed. We are going to get hit time and again by decisions taken by external bodies, whether that be regulators in the EU, the USA or Geneva. We live in a globalising world and the story never goes backwards.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 10 Sep 17 11.28am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Kermit8
This is the kind of ill-judged arrogance that if replicated by our negotiating team will see Brexit being destructive and long term at that for the UK. You have no way of knowing that. It's just sour grapes.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 10 Sep 17 11.30am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by legaleagle
So,we now live in the kind of democratic country where if people march lawfully against a non-binding 51-49 per cent referendum outcome they should leave the country... Blimey. Let them march I say. It gives the hard of thinking something to do.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
susmik PLYMOUTH -But Made in Old Coulsdon... 10 Sep 17 4.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Dave58
Many of the people who wanted to remain, did not vote. Sadly especially young people who think politics isn't cool. Well they woke up and voted in the general election. I totally agree with all you have put the EU does not really know what to do because we are leaving that is why they keep on harping about stupid divorce bill etc when in fact we need pay NOTHING and should get money BACK from them. Brexit is only the start and other countries will soon follow and some are even asking the Germans to do the negotiations with us instead of the two to$$ers doing the negotiating now.
Supported Palace for over 69 years since the age of 7 and have seen all the ups and downs and will probably see many more ups and downs before I go up to the big football club in the sky. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 10 Sep 17 5.08pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Kermit8
This is the kind of ill-judged arrogance that if replicated by our negotiating team will see Brexit being destructive and long term at that for the UK. So the EU can be arrogant and we can't......Usual oh so patriotic stuff from you. We will see who blinks. We will have a free trade deal and people like you with your portents of doom about 'arrogance' are just talking beta male fear mongering nonsense.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 10 Sep 17 5.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
So the EU can be arrogant and we can't......Usual oh so patriotic stuff from you. We will see who blinks. We will have a free trade deal and people like you with your portents of doom about 'arrogance' are just talking beta male fear mongering nonsense. Be honest, you care more about point scoring for your warped thinking than you do about where our country may be heading. You have deluded yourself into thinking you are the great patriot. And accusing others of fear mongering is passe now. Negotiations about negotiations have already started and gotten nowhere fast due to, it appears, us trying to somewhat welch on our signed up for commitments through legal loopholes. That won't look good come March 2019 re:trade deals if we are looked upon as a country that doesn't pay back debts, will it? Standard & Poors will have their say. Reality time. Edited by Kermit8 (10 Sep 2017 5.27pm)
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 10 Sep 17 6.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Kermit8
Be honest, you care more about point scoring for your warped thinking than you do about where our country may be heading. You have deluded yourself into thinking you are the great patriot. And accusing others of fear mongering is passe now. Negotiations about negotiations have already started and gotten nowhere fast due to, it appears, us trying to somewhat welch on our signed up for commitments through legal loopholes. That won't look good come March 2019 re:trade deals if we are looked upon as a country that doesn't pay back debts, will it? Standard & Poors will have their say. Reality time. Edited by Kermit8 (10 Sep 2017 5.27pm) Oh, I most definitely like point scoring....you know that Kermy....there's always a knockabout element to this....this is frenemies for me really. I don't know about a 'great' patriot. I just think that an understated but committed nationalism is a good thing for all countries. I have that for my own country and when I think about the alternatives I regard it as a good tool within society.....but like most things...moderation and reflection are important. The lawyers will ultimately decide upon a reasonable 'divorce bill' for want of a better term. Britain hasn't defaulted on a debt in 300 years. It isn't going to start now.......You see, patriots know things like this Kermy.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Bobtail Crowborough 10 Sep 17 8.31pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Henry of Peckham
You are right. It is a shambles, but should be a great success story if our leaders had any sort of clue. The damage was done before anyone voted. Remain leaders gave us the choice, and had millions of booklets printed at taxpayers' expense telling us in strident terms why we should stay. The political morons (Cameron, Gideon) were bitterly opposed to Brexit themselves, and so determined arrogant and sure that the electorate would vote 'Remain' that they didn't have a plan for Brexit. The civil service should have been working on all policy options and departments organised before the vote. The government should have been ready to start immediately. That was gross dereliction by Cameron, and appears to be why the May government, and it really wouldn't matter which party it is, has been slow to start the process, and appears to be disorganised. But then we Brexit voters are supposed to be the thick ones. Ho hum. At least we've got the football to er....
Open your eyes, look up to the skies and see |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.