At work.

So true.

I think that "At their place of employment" would be a better description than "working"

Do you not accept that is a massive leap of faith on your part?

You just don't know why people voted how they did. It's the equivalent of saying "the Tories had a 'mare but still have the largest number of seats, therefore the public has just given a massive vote of confidence to austerity". It makes no sense - it's just seeing what you want to see.

How were they voted against comprehensively? Just because most parties had a different spending approach in their manifesto among the multitude of other policies?

See my brexit example in the previous post - the way this is all going, I suspect a new referendum may well return a 'remain', yet 90% of voters voted for parties favouring brexit, and the parties rejecting brexit got pasted. You're just cherry picking manifesto pledges and assuming that is what people voted for because that's what you voted for (presumably).

I think that Labour will financially mismanage the NHS, but in doing so provide shorter waiting less, better coverage, health care etc.

Largely because most of the people who vote Labour are also locked into using the NHS. Its a tradition, even of Communism, that provision of health care to its population, tends to exceed its economic rivals.

That's not a defence of say Soviet Communism - but a reasonable point, that compared to similar economic scaled countries and regional countries, the scope and provision of health care was above norm.

Of course its not because they're better ethically or morally, but its an effective 'bribe' to the people to tolerate them. Similarly you see the same kind of rise in literacy and educational achievement.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Touche PTJ, Touche.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]