Now I think you are just defending for the sake of it.

If something is slanderous and libelous then it is automatically controversial to some. That's just pedantic.

If it were possible to ban Katie Hopkins then the activists would do that. She is continually referred to the Police who under our ridiculous current 'hate speech' laws are continually 'investigating' her.

In fact a little knowledge of what the activists are doing shows that they will use any and every legal tool, ethical or unethical to silence her.

Conspiracy? It isn't illegal to complain about someone but it's just ethically wrong to continually pressure employers to sack her because you don't like her.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Paul Condon, one-time Commissioner of the Met, was rounded on by the usual suspects some years ago for stating that the majority of street crime in London was committed by young, black men. And he, of all people, would have been in a unique position to know.

I think its certainly cross a line to call for a Final Solution.

As for her views, and those who oppose her views, I don't have a problem with that. Speech isn't free of consequence or protest, and nor should it be. Its part of how democratic process seems to work, groups of people on each side attack and try to shut down political discourse - Its kind of how the game is played.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

I think referring to the Nazis was a bit strong, even for that mouth piece, but in essence she is right, in as much as people are thredders with the whole IS thing. I think the point she was making (badly, as is her MO) is that enough is a fcking enough.

The way I see it it's simple. Those that have known sympathies to IS, looked at their websites, make arsehoel comments on Lee rigbys facebook page and march through the streets of London supporting IS and the like get banged up simple. They can plot all they like inside, they can't bomb London from inside Parkhurst, and so what if they get even further radicalised, couldnt give less of a fcuk if I tried, they just end up spending their whole life inside wouldn't bother me in the slightest.

This is the UK not pakistan or Syria, we have our rules, If you are lucky enough to live here and take the benefits of living here, then you play by our rules, if not fcuk off.

Simple.

Edited by dannyh (26 May 2017 1.05pm)

"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Ill advised and worthy of reproach deliberate or not. But that's the extent of it. So we can't say, 'a final solution' now because of the Nazis?

Edited by Stirlingsays (26 May 2017 1.06pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Well, the situation does indeed requires a solution that is permanent rather than the usual platitudes. Given the connotations of the phrase 'final solution', though, it was ill-advised at best.