You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Joshua or a Vlad?
November 22 2024 11.24pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Joshua or a Vlad?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 4 of 4 << First< 1 2 3 4

  

Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 30 Apr 17 4.50pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Maybe the WBO World Champion 'Joseph Parker' could come into the mix.He has a 22 and 0 record with 18 by KO.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
croydon proud Flag Any european country i fancy! 30 Apr 17 7.32pm

He said on bbc its all down to the jam cakes his family send from nigeria, saw them going crazy in his home town over there, must be so proud, lovely fella and can go on an on!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Shifty97 Flag Croydon 30 Apr 17 9.09pm Send a Private Message to Shifty97 Add Shifty97 as a friend

Originally posted by Casual

He just knocked klitschko out mate, 1st time its happened in 10 years. But he shouldn't have fought him ? Ha ha. Go and have a lay down mate.

I didn't say HE shouldn't be fighting Klitschko, I said the FIGHT should not have happened in my opinion, look AJ has improved with every fight but he has still got a long way to go but I was not talking about this or his quality when I said the fight should not be happening. This was a world title fight but in my opinion AJ has not earned the right to challenge for it. He had less than 20 fights before last night and none of his opponents were any good. I don't see how he has been able to move up the world rankings fighting those clowns. It just p*ssed me off how he had not had a proper fight but then was challenging for a world title on big night like that. I know heavyweight boxing does not have many top fighters any more but for me he should have had at least one fight against a highly ranked fighter such as Wilder, Parker or even someone like Ortiz or even Pulev. It is for that reason that I did not think he deserved to be in last nights fight.

I know AJ has the IBF world title too and that p*ssed me off at the time too. What p*ssed me off even more was that Charles Martin held it before him, worse than that was the opponent he had for the fight when it was vacant.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Casual Flag Orpington 30 Apr 17 9.25pm Send a Private Message to Casual Add Casual as a friend

Originally posted by Shifty97

I didn't say HE shouldn't be fighting Klitschko, I said the FIGHT should not have happened in my opinion, look AJ has improved with every fight but he has still got a long way to go but I was not talking about this or his quality when I said the fight should not be happening. This was a world title fight but in my opinion AJ has not earned the right to challenge for it. He had less than 20 fights before last night and none of his opponents were any good. I don't see how he has been able to move up the world rankings fighting those clowns. It just p*ssed me off how he had not had a proper fight but then was challenging for a world title on big night like that. I know heavyweight boxing does not have many top fighters any more but for me he should have had at least one fight against a highly ranked fighter such as Wilder, Parker or even someone like Ortiz or even Pulev. It is for that reason that I did not think he deserved to be in last nights fight.

I know AJ has the IBF world title too and that p*ssed me off at the time too. What p*ssed me off even more was that Charles Martin held it before him, worse than that was the opponent he had for the fight when it was vacant.

There's loads of sh*t in the heavy weight division. If AJ didn't deserve to fight Klitschko, who lost his last fight to a 2 bob who had beaten no one of any merit before him. Who should have fought Klitschko? Don't say Parker , a pumped up cruiserweight who's a star in New Zealand and no where else.
Wilder was always being set up for a unification fight with Joshua. So who else is there?
You say AJ has a long way to go , if it was in the era of Holyfield , Tyson, Bowe and Lewis or the Ali era , I'd agree, but there's no one decent about anymore. Look at the 3 champs , AJ, Wilder, Parker who have any of them beat of any note? Klitschko that's it.
AJ was great last night and a British Wotld heavy weight champion , like The result at Stamford Bridge , enjoy it, as it might not happen again for a while.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
black eagle. Flag south croydon. 30 Apr 17 9.50pm Send a Private Message to black eagle. Add black eagle. as a friend

The likes of Parker should be fighting Tony Belew.
As Lennox Lewis said AJ has a touch of the Mike Tysons about him the way he finishes opponents.

AJ will clean up the division he is only going to get better.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Pussay Patrol Flag 30 Apr 17 9.56pm

Originally posted by Willo

In actual fact at the time of the stoppage, two out of the three judges had Joshua in front.

that was nonsense, Wlad was completely in command at that point.

How on earth can they conclude that Joshua was outboxing Wlad?

 


Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
rikz Flag Croydon 01 May 17 4.16pm Send a Private Message to rikz Add rikz as a friend

Originally posted by Shifty97

I didn't say HE shouldn't be fighting Klitschko, I said the FIGHT should not have happened in my opinion, look AJ has improved with every fight but he has still got a long way to go but I was not talking about this or his quality when I said the fight should not be happening. This was a world title fight but in my opinion AJ has not earned the right to challenge for it. He had less than 20 fights before last night and none of his opponents were any good. I don't see how he has been able to move up the world rankings fighting those clowns. It just p*ssed me off how he had not had a proper fight but then was challenging for a world title on big night like that. I know heavyweight boxing does not have many top fighters any more but for me he should have had at least one fight against a highly ranked fighter such as Wilder, Parker or even someone like Ortiz or even Pulev. It is for that reason that I did not think he deserved to be in last nights fight.

I know AJ has the IBF world title too and that p*ssed me off at the time too. What p*ssed me off even more was that Charles Martin held it before him, worse than that was the opponent he had for the fight when it was vacant.

Mate you really don't have a clue what your talking about. Sick of hearing today's fighters being compared to yesterday's. Every generation of champion are always worse than before but strangely always better than tomorrows. Compare joshuas first 17 opponents to Tysons and guess what, they have a better combined record.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 4 of 4 << First< 1 2 3 4

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Joshua or a Vlad?