This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
jamiemartin721 Reading 09 May 17 2.11pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Abolish as many ‘controls’, state interference and layers of government as is compatible with the provision of justice, law and order, defence, social welfare, and eduction. Thus leaving the greatest scope for the people themselves to determine the content of their lives. Edited by hedgehog50 (09 May 2017 10.51am) Anarchist!
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Part Time James 09 May 17 2.15pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
I do, but my company donates regularly to donkey sanctuaries - I'd happily allocate my tax from MP's pay rises and decorating cabinet ministers offices to animal sanctuaries. I'm a softy when it comes to animals. I only like animals in a bun or a pot of glue.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Part Time James 09 May 17 2.19pm | |
---|---|
How about we all lived in almost impenetrable cells that no one could interfere with? All self contained and all communication was made via chat windows where you could block anyone that annoyed you. Big savings to be had, you'd have very little concern about national security, they couldn't burn down and you couldn't be robbed. Plus you wouldn't need to elect a government, you'd be on your own personal soil (not literally) at all times and laws would be defunct. Do what you like. And the population could be controlled by randomised closure of the glory hole portcullis.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 09 May 17 2.38pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Part Time James
I only like animals in a bun or a pot of glue. Oddly, that's how I feel about most people.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Part Time James 09 May 17 2.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Oddly, that's how I feel about most people. Kinky
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
mezzer Main Stand, Block F, Row 20 seat 1... 09 May 17 2.56pm | |
---|---|
I went out with a pot of glue once. She was a bit stuck up but we became quite attached in the end.
Living down here does have some advantages. At least you can see them cry. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Part Time James 09 May 17 2.59pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by mezzer
I went out with a pot of glue once. She was a bit stuck up but we became quite attached in the end. As long as she adhered to your rules.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
hedgehog50 Croydon 09 May 17 3.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Anarchist! Sure, in that we should have a free economy and society rather than a state run economy and society limited by the horizon of the few in government rather than having faith in the limitless resources and possibilities of the people themselves.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 09 May 17 3.13pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Part Time James
As long as she adhered to your rules. My todge is 12" long but I don't use it as a rule.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Michaelawt85 Bexley 09 May 17 3.15pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Part Time James
How about we all lived in almost impenetrable cells that no one could interfere with? All self contained and all communication was made via chat windows where you could block anyone that annoyed you. Big savings to be had, you'd have very little concern about national security, they couldn't burn down and you couldn't be robbed. Plus you wouldn't need to elect a government, you'd be on your own personal soil (not literally) at all times and laws would be defunct. Do what you like. And the population could be controlled by randomised closure of the glory hole portcullis. How would we get food and drink?
When I was a young girl my Mother said to me.. You listen here kid you're CPFC |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 09 May 17 3.18pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Michaelawt85
How would we get food and drink? By liquefying the dead and feeding it through an elaborate system of pipework.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 09 May 17 4.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Sure, in that we should have a free economy and society rather than a state run economy and society limited by the horizon of the few in government rather than having faith in the limitless resources and possibilities of the people themselves. Libertarianism, I must admit that I'm quite partial to left and right of centre libertarianism. The more extreme swings to the right and left seem a bit to idealistic. I could live with centre-right libertarianism. And I certainly believe in governments being bound to deliver to its citizens, rather than themselves and their cronies.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.