This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
NEILLO Shoreham-by-Sea 27 Dec 16 1.16pm | |
---|---|
My opinion ; Gomes was a minimum yellow card. And if that had been an outfield player, a straight red. As for the other main talking points ; Stupid penalty conceded by Delaney - deserved the card Overall, a standard Clattenberg performance when officiating a Palace game. But I do give him credit for ignoring the efforts of the Watford players to get Benteke a second yellow.
Old, Ungifted and White |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cannoneagle 27 Dec 16 1.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dynamicdick
So why wasn't a yellow given Willo and yet he gave Delaney one plus a penalty, again no consistency and with arguably (very) with the leagues best ref in charge? Don't worry with Willo anymore, he's just on the wind up, if Clatterf*** said Man Utd play in blue, he'd say I understand why he thought that!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 27 Dec 16 1.24pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cannoneagle
Don't worry with Willo anymore, he's just on the wind up, if Clatterf*** said Man Utd play in blue, he'd say I understand why he thought that! I can assure you this is NOT the case.Just giving my honest opinion. At the end of the day when Mark's performance is analysed as part of a 'Forensic' analysis, which is normal, they might decide that a card should have been awarded, all I am doing is giving my opinion based on what I have seen.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 27 Dec 16 1.30pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dynamicdick
I think 'Mark Clattenburg, it's all about you' is absolutely spot on and in no way insulting, more a singing statement of fact. He is biased. It's a self fulfilling prophesy
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cannoneagle 27 Dec 16 1.30pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
I can assure you this is NOT the case.Just giving my honest opinion. At the end of the day when Mark's performance is analysed as part of a 'Forensic' analysis, which is normal, they might decide that a card should have been awarded, all I am doing is giving my opinion based on what I have seen. Well here is the truth.....the goalkeeper was committed so made a decision.to pre b ent a goal and accept the consequences. He made the right call based on Benteke's pathetic attempt at the penalty. However, he knew he was going to make the foul.....i.e. A booking at least. Why you can't just admit that is proof that you are just trying to provoke people.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 27 Dec 16 1.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cannoneagle
Well here is the truth.....the goalkeeper was committed so made a decision.to pre b ent a goal and accept the consequences. He made the right call based on Benteke's pathetic attempt at the penalty. However, he knew he was going to make the foul.....i.e. A booking at least. Why you can't just admit that is proof that you are just trying to provoke people. I could argue they are provoking me ! At the end of the day I respect the opinion of others but I disagree with them.All I am doing is giving you my opinion that's all.I am certainly not taking an alternative position as an act of provocation or to stimulate any sort of debate.I hope you can accept this. Anyway I am going out shortly so HOL will be a "Willo Free" zone for a while !
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Dangermouse Hastings 27 Dec 16 3.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hoof Hearted
Nobody would have been screaming "outrage" if Clattenburg had given Gomes a red card.... clumsy or not intentional... he caught Benteke around knee height and it deserved a red. To see that Clattenburg hadn't even given him a yellow was infuriating yet again especially when later on he gave Delaney a yellow for his penalty infringement. This so called impartial arbiter of the laws of our game needs investigating as to why CPFC always end up on the wrong end of injustice every match he officiates in involving our club. "bad luck" is supposed to even itself out, but when Clattenburg is involved we constantly suffer from his incompetence or deliberate application not in our favour. Without even giving it much thought I can cite yesterday, last year's FA Cup final and WBA away 2 seasons ago where we were the victims of major refereeing injustice by clattenburg's application of the laws. In the WBA game he allowed Dawson a free rein to inflict GBH on Speroni with his elbow FFS. PS - this is a statement of my thoughts and not an invitation to Trollo or anybody else to bore me to death with how great "Mark" is and how he is much maligned by Palace fans. Edited by Hoof Hearted (27 Dec 2016 11.07am) I'm actually beginning to believe in conspiracy theories about c***enburg now. How is he allowed to rewrite the law book, especially against us.
That's Life |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
OhthisbloodyPC 27 Dec 16 3.22pm | |
---|---|
I thought it was a terrible tackle. deserved a yellow just for being so reckless. Anywhere else on the pitch he would have got a yellow. Especially if he was alan Pardew and nutted someone in the 'technical area'. ~It might well have been an 'accident', but I tried that plea once and I still got three points on my license and the stigma of being convicted for 'Driving Without Due Care and Attention' I think he should have got a red, my logic being: He plays for watford
Item 1. Shows Damien Delaney getting a yellow card, while conceding a penalty. You will see from the photograph that the Watford player does not receive a pianful kick to his knee Item 2. This photographic series shows Wilfred Zaha - of CPFC - dribbling [A footballing erm for running with the ball at his feet, M'Lud, a duty at which Zaha excels}.... yes, dribbling into the Watford area. He is, we shall argue, brought down by a Watford player, who does not play the ball.
The defence rests
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Inapickle South West 27 Dec 16 3.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by fish mitten
For me a red card. Yes he's going away from goal, but it's the nature of the challenge. No attempt to get the ball. He just kicks Benteke and if that was a outfield player doing that it would be a red. I think Gomes was going for the ball to boot it into the stands, he had no intention of kicking Benteke and Clatterburg in my opinion got that right, penalty was enough of a penalty for Gomes.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
OhthisbloodyPC 27 Dec 16 3.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Inapickle
I think Gomes was going for the ball to boot it into the stands, he had no intention of kicking Benteke and Clatterburg in my opinion got that right, penalty was enough of a penalty for Gomes.
Don't ever pull a stunt like that in my court room again
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
coulsdoneagle London 27 Dec 16 4.06pm | |
---|---|
Was going away from goal, and wouldn't have been a red as the rule has been changed. Probably should have been a yellow if he is going to give a yellow to Damo for a push in the box. Having said that by the letter of the law he didn't deny a goal scoring opportunity because Benteke was heading out of play and it was a foul so probably the correct call.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Y Ddraig Goch In The Crowd 27 Dec 16 4.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Inapickle
I think Gomes was going for the ball to boot it into the stands, he had no intention of kicking Benteke and Clatterburg in my opinion got that right, penalty was enough of a penalty for Gomes. It doesn't matter what his intention was, it is what he did. Lots of fouls, often the worst are not intentional, doesn't make it any less dangerous or a foul.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.