You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > £43 million to try and replace Glenn Murray
November 24 2024 6.13am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

£43 million to try and replace Glenn Murray

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 4 of 16 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

  

iheartcpfc Flag SE25 07 Sep 16 4.47pm Send a Private Message to iheartcpfc Add iheartcpfc as a friend

also, people need to quickly get used to spending £5-10m on backups

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 07 Sep 16 4.49pm Send a Private Message to Cucking Funt Add Cucking Funt as a friend

I have carefully considered the contents of the OP and have come to the conclusion that it's absolute bollocks.

 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Username Flag Horsham 07 Sep 16 4.50pm Send a Private Message to Username Add Username as a friend

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

What on earth are you on about?

DF scouted Murray in League 1 for the Champ and got him to agree shortly before his contract ended. That doesn't happen very often and happens hardly ever in the Prem.

The nearest you get is bringing Defoe back but he is proven anyway.

Or you sign bargain after bargain and never find the answer, and haven't we just done that? And we are not the only ones to do that either.

It can be the difference between Prem survival or Championship oblivion.

And end result is you're left with 3 or 4 mediocre to not good enough at Prem level strikers on more wages than 1 that IS PROVEN. Now we have 1 on a huge wage and one on a medium one and one on loan. There is no problem upfront fella.

Defoe was hardly free anyway considering they had to give him a 5 year deal on huge wages.

We paid under £10m for a 22 year old kid who has shown massive potential. When fit last season and after a run in the side he showed he is as good if not better than Murray and at ten years his younger is a good bet to improve.

Mental money for Benteke?

We paid £30m for a player who has scored 51 in 118 Premier League games and in his 'terrible' season when he was a flop at Liverpool, still banged in more league goals than anyone in our squad.

Seems a pretty fair deal to me.

 


Employee of the month is a good example of how someone can be both a winner and a loser at the same time.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
tonymikejoe Flag UK 07 Sep 16 4.53pm Send a Private Message to tonymikejoe Add tonymikejoe as a friend

Originally posted by Cucking Funt

I have carefully considered the contents of the OP and have come to the conclusion that it's absolute bollocks.


What? Are you seriously suggesting the four big target men (Sanogo, Wickham, Adebayor and Benteke) were not attempted replacements for Murray.

While I'm on here a quick message to everyone: Nowhere in the original post did I express a desire for Glenn Murray to still be our centre-forward.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Dan89 Flag Se25 07 Sep 16 4.57pm Send a Private Message to Dan89 Add Dan89 as a friend

Forward line has been a big problem since promotion and now the board has addressed it. It time to get behind the boys.

COYP

 


Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Midlands Eagle Flag 07 Sep 16 5.08pm Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by tonymikejoe

What? Are you seriously suggesting the four big target men (Sanogo, Wickham, Adebayor and Benteke) were not attempted replacements for Murray.

Connor Wickham was bought on 1st August 2015 whilst Glenn Murray wasn't sold until one month later so he obviously wasn't bought as a replacement.

I think that the main problem wasn't Wickham but Fraiser Campbell who has never really been a great success for us and Adebayor and Benteke were probably brought in to replace him

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Sedlescombe Flag Sedlescombe 07 Sep 16 5.09pm Send a Private Message to Sedlescombe Add Sedlescombe as a friend

Originally posted by tonymikejoe


What? Are you seriously suggesting the four big target men (Sanogo, Wickham, Adebayor and Benteke) were not attempted replacements for Murray.

While I'm on here a quick message to everyone: Nowhere in the original post did I express a desire for Glenn Murray to still be our centre-forward.



I am not sure what point you are making. Two of those were loans and were never anything more than stopgaps and two signings that I think will do just fine

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 07 Sep 16 5.37pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by iheartcpfc

also, people need to quickly get used to spending £5-10m on backups

Exactly. This is the most expensive league in the world and tv money has to be spent to keep up.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 07 Sep 16 5.41pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by Username

Defoe was hardly free anyway considering they had to give him a 5 year deal on huge wages.

We paid under £10m for a 22 year old kid who has shown massive potential. When fit last season and after a run in the side he showed he is as good if not better than Murray and at ten years his younger is a good bet to improve.

Mental money for Benteke?

We paid £30m for a player who has scored 51 in 118 Premier League games and in his 'terrible' season when he was a flop at Liverpool, still banged in more league goals than anyone in our squad.

Seems a pretty fair deal to me.

I was talking about wages.

And end result is you're left with 3 or 4 mediocre to not good enough at Prem level strikers on more wages than 1 who IS PROVEN. Now we have 1 on a huge wage and one on a medium one and one on loan. There is no problem upfront fella.

We were paying 3 players who couldn't cut it more than we're paying Benteke who will IMO.

Benteke £130k or £140k

Adebayor £67k
Gayle £30k?
Chamakh £40k (best season had left him)
Campbell £30k?


Edited by Rudi Hedman (07 Sep 2016 5.41pm)

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 07 Sep 16 5.43pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

Connor Wickham was bought on 1st August 2015 whilst Glenn Murray wasn't sold until one month later so he obviously wasn't bought as a replacement.

I think that the main problem wasn't Wickham but Fraiser Campbell who has never really been a great success for us and Adebayor and Benteke were probably brought in to replace him

And Gayle not leaving to Bristol City.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 07 Sep 16 5.45pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by tonymikejoe


What? Are you seriously suggesting the four big target men (Sanogo, Wickham, Adebayor and Benteke) were not attempted replacements for Murray.

While I'm on here a quick message to everyone: Nowhere in the original post did I express a desire for Glenn Murray to still be our centre-forward.


Give up mate. Bottom line is we tried to do it on the cheap and nothing worked so now we pay for goals like everybody else or we risk getting relegated. Which would you prefer?

Or we could've spent quite a bit more than we did and wasted more on average or less strikers.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Painter Flag Croydon 07 Sep 16 6.07pm Send a Private Message to Painter Add Painter as a friend

Originally posted by tonymikejoe


What? Are you seriously suggesting the four big target men (Sanogo, Wickham, Adebayor and Benteke) were not attempted replacements for Murray.

While I'm on here a quick message to everyone: Nowhere in the original post did I express a desire for Glenn Murray to still be our centre-forward.


The position we are in, is very different from when Murray arrived. Ever since he got injured in the play offs, he was never the same player again unfortunately. He hasn't set anywhere alight since he left, so selling him was the right move.

We have gone from a turnover of about £12m then to £120m now. Players are going to cost more, as clubs know we have money. Sometimes you need to take a gamble on players Sanogo and Adebayor didn't pay off, but strikers are hard to come by.

Ferguson took many gambles that didn't pay off, but he is regarded as the best Premiership Manager ever.

I don't see why you feel the need to try and make out, the club has no idea what its doing.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 4 of 16 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > £43 million to try and replace Glenn Murray