This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
jamiemartin721 Reading 22 Apr 15 3.57pm | |
---|---|
Quote ghosteagle at 22 Apr 2015 3.09pm
Quote Stuk at 22 Apr 2015 2.14pm
Quote ghosteagle at 22 Apr 2015 1.27pm
Quote Stuk at 22 Apr 2015 1.25pm
We're not a mediterranean country. If this was happening in the Irish sea, North sea or Channel do you think Malta, Italy and Cyprus would be dealing with it? No we would be, along with the other countries adjacent to those bodies of water.
We didn't bomb Libya back to the stoneage and they seemed quite keen on getting rid of Gaddafi at the time. The majority attempting to cross aren't Libyan either so that's a bollocks argument to begin with. I was going to reply and tell you how wrong your are..... but everybody else seems to have beat me to it Its not entirely wrong, effectively the bombing campaign coupled with the uprising and conflict essentially create a failed state that lacked the apparatus and capacity for authority of the state and state functionality. Syria would be the biggest problem. What efforts did we go to for the aid of Syrian refugees fleeing from the war, IS etc. The important thing in these situations is to try to establish effective refugee communities in the neighbouring nations where people flee too. If you can build camps where life isn't 'too bad' then people tend to stay there. Problem is, usually that's left to the UN and the countrys flooded with refugees to deal with (and we're not the only guilty party, the world is).
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 22 Apr 15 3.59pm | |
---|---|
Quote ghosteagle at 22 Apr 2015 3.09pm
Quote Stuk at 22 Apr 2015 2.14pm
Quote ghosteagle at 22 Apr 2015 1.27pm
Quote Stuk at 22 Apr 2015 1.25pm
We're not a mediterranean country. If this was happening in the Irish sea, North sea or Channel do you think Malta, Italy and Cyprus would be dealing with it? No we would be, along with the other countries adjacent to those bodies of water.
We didn't bomb Libya back to the stoneage and they seemed quite keen on getting rid of Gaddafi at the time. The majority attempting to cross aren't Libyan either so that's a bollocks argument to begin with. I was going to reply and tell you how wrong your are..... but everybody else seems to have beat me to it
How are we at fault for Eritreans, Syrians, Moroccans etc and why does Africa not have to do anything about it, only Europe? I'd be happy for us to assist with stopping boats leaving Africa but no one seems to want to do that.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Johnny Eagles berlin 22 Apr 15 4.08pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stuk at 22 Apr 2015 3.50pm
It is bollocks, if they were 90% Libyan blame us. After the USA and France that is, they led the call on that. I'd rather we had left them to it in Iraq, Afghan, Libya along with the whole Arab spring malarky. The easier/safer anyone makes the route, the more people will use it.
If Libya were (as it was for years) a stable state with working institutions (albeit corrupt and oppressive ones) it would be controlling its borders. They'd stop all the would-be immigrants from getting to the coast. Now Libya is effectively a broken state with open borders. Ergo, all and sundry are free to try and get to Italy.
...we must expand...get more pupils...so that the knowledge will spread... |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 22 Apr 15 5.00pm | |
---|---|
Quote Johnny Eagles at 22 Apr 2015 4.08pm
Quote Stuk at 22 Apr 2015 3.50pm
It is bollocks, if they were 90% Libyan blame us. After the USA and France that is, they led the call on that. I'd rather we had left them to it in Iraq, Afghan, Libya along with the whole Arab spring malarky. The easier/safer anyone makes the route, the more people will use it.
If Libya were (as it was for years) a stable state with working institutions (albeit corrupt and oppressive ones) it would be controlling its borders. They'd stop all the would-be immigrants from getting to the coast. Now Libya is effectively a broken state with open borders. Ergo, all and sundry are free to try and get to Italy.
Stop them at departure then, before all of the risks, rather than waiting until they're in the s*** and hopefully getting them out of it.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
pefwin Where you have to have an English ... 22 Apr 15 5.23pm | |
---|---|
Quote Johnny Eagles at 22 Apr 2015 2.33pm
Quote Stuk at 22 Apr 2015 2.14pm
Quote ghosteagle at 22 Apr 2015 1.27pm
Quote Stuk at 22 Apr 2015 1.25pm
We're not a mediterranean country. If this was happening in the Irish sea, North sea or Channel do you think Malta, Italy and Cyprus would be dealing with it? No we would be, along with the other countries adjacent to those bodies of water.
We didn't bomb Libya back to the stoneage and they seemed quite keen on getting rid of Gaddafi at the time. The majority attempting to cross aren't Libyan either so that's a bollocks argument to begin with. It's not a bollocks argument, Stu. One of the reasons the West supported the 'strong men' in North Africa for so long was because they did us a favour in controlling immigration. Ironically, the do-gooding people who are now hand-wringing about drowning immigrants are the same ones who were egging on the "rebels" during the Arab spring. If they REALLY cared, they'd be out there trying to rescue people themselves. Edited by Johnny Eagles (22 Apr 2015 2.35pm)
You go can even further back, but you may recollect the F1-111 bombing of Libya in 86. Although a dictator, with all the trappings, Gadhafi, in the late 90s and 00s, took a position of being a mediator and also was trying to use Libyan petro-dollars to aid sub-Saharan states. He even apologised for Arab involvement in the slave trade, something must HOL'ers were up in arms about when "one eye" did something similar. Edited by pefwin (22 Apr 2015 5.23pm)
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 22 Apr 15 5.23pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stuk at 22 Apr 2015 5.00pm
Quote Johnny Eagles at 22 Apr 2015 4.08pm
Quote Stuk at 22 Apr 2015 3.50pm
It is bollocks, if they were 90% Libyan blame us. After the USA and France that is, they led the call on that. I'd rather we had left them to it in Iraq, Afghan, Libya along with the whole Arab spring malarky. The easier/safer anyone makes the route, the more people will use it.
If Libya were (as it was for years) a stable state with working institutions (albeit corrupt and oppressive ones) it would be controlling its borders. They'd stop all the would-be immigrants from getting to the coast. Now Libya is effectively a broken state with open borders. Ergo, all and sundry are free to try and get to Italy.
Stop them at departure then, before all of the risks, rather than waiting until they're in the s*** and hopefully getting them out of it.
Just post half a dozen smallish armed naval vessels off the coast of Libya and send them back to port before they get into trouble/drown. Don't interfere with any country in North Africa or anywhere else because it doesn't help in the long run. Let them sort themselves out.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
pefwin Where you have to have an English ... 22 Apr 15 5.31pm | |
---|---|
Quote Hoof Hearted at 22 Apr 2015 5.23pm
I'm with you Stu. Just post half a dozen smallish armed naval vessels off the coast of Libya and send them back to port before they get into trouble/drown. Don't interfere with any country in North Africa or anywhere else because it doesn't help in the long run. Let them sort themselves out. So that's the whole of the UK navy and who else?
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 22 Apr 15 5.39pm | |
---|---|
Quote pefwin at 22 Apr 2015 5.31pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 22 Apr 2015 5.23pm
I'm with you Stu. Just post half a dozen smallish armed naval vessels off the coast of Libya and send them back to port before they get into trouble/drown. Don't interfere with any country in North Africa or anywhere else because it doesn't help in the long run. Let them sort themselves out. So that's the whole of the UK navy and who else?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Pussay Patrol 22 Apr 15 6.21pm | |
---|---|
They should be given sanctuary in the nearest safe country. Through Italy, through Spain, through Eastern Europe, through Germany, through France, Through Belgium then safely into the UK
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 22 Apr 15 7.22pm | |
---|---|
Quote pefwin at 22 Apr 2015 5.31pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 22 Apr 2015 5.23pm
I'm with you Stu. Just post half a dozen smallish armed naval vessels off the coast of Libya and send them back to port before they get into trouble/drown. Don't interfere with any country in North Africa or anywhere else because it doesn't help in the long run. Let them sort themselves out. So that's the whole of the UK navy and who else?
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
rob1969 Banstead Surrey 22 Apr 15 9.22pm | |
---|---|
Agree with all the "we brought it upon ourselves" etc but we can't put the clock back - we are here now. How about redirecting some of the millions we currently give in foreign aid - to regional super powers like India - to help finance the search/rescue operation in the med. Then use the balance of it to improve the lot in the areas that most refugees coming from. Give the aid through UK charities working locally in these countries - not their governments for obvious reasons. Not a solution but might be a start. The only long term solution is some form of redistribution of nations wealth. Not a vote winner !
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 22 Apr 15 9.29pm | |
---|---|
I have nothing but admiration for those poor dispossessed and traumatised souls trying to get some kind of life going to a foreign place many miles from what was their home and is no longer. It's a suicide mission for many but good luck to the ones that make it.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.