You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > The Tories are w*nkers
November 24 2024 1.59am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

The Tories are w*nkers

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 4 of 10 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

  

The Sash Flag Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 16 Feb 15 1.25pm Send a Private Message to The Sash Add The Sash as a friend

The Tories are w@nkers
Labour are w@nkers
Lib Dems are w@nkers
UKIP are w@nkers
Green Party are w@nkers

All ideologically driven, self serving, party first c*nts of the highest order.

 


As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
The Sash Flag Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 16 Feb 15 1.28pm Send a Private Message to The Sash Add The Sash as a friend

Quote Lyons550 at 16 Feb 2015 1.11pm

Quote serial thriller at 15 Feb 2015 11.39pm

Just in case you didn't realise...

[Link]

I don't even know where to begin. They are c*nts, out of touch, heartless, bloodthirsty c*nts of the highest order and I hope that Ed Milliband wins a landslide not because I like Labour, but just to rub in in these horrible conceited c*nts' faces that even a morally bankrupt party like Labour with a clown as leader is more popular than their brand of victimising, fear-inducing alienating politics.

F*ck you Cameron. F*ck you.


Are they out of touch ....or are you? Who's to say?

Mentioned it elsewhere - Charlie Brookers VT and summation of Millibands response to the yoof who asked him about what experience outside of politics made him suitable for PM is hilarious if you can find it in iplayer.

No politicians are in touch with the populace because they drive and are driven by their own ideology first and foremost.


Edited by The Sash (16 Feb 2015 1.29pm)

 


As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Lyons550 Flag Shirley 16 Feb 15 1.44pm Send a Private Message to Lyons550 Add Lyons550 as a friend

Quote The Sash at 16 Feb 2015 1.28pm

Quote Lyons550 at 16 Feb 2015 1.11pm

Quote serial thriller at 15 Feb 2015 11.39pm

Just in case you didn't realise...

[Link]

I don't even know where to begin. They are c*nts, out of touch, heartless, bloodthirsty c*nts of the highest order and I hope that Ed Milliband wins a landslide not because I like Labour, but just to rub in in these horrible conceited c*nts' faces that even a morally bankrupt party like Labour with a clown as leader is more popular than their brand of victimising, fear-inducing alienating politics.

F*ck you Cameron. F*ck you.


Are they out of touch ....or are you? Who's to say?

Mentioned it elsewhere - Charlie Brookers VT and summation of Millibands response to the yoof who asked him about what experience outside of politics made him suitable for PM is hilarious if you can find it in iplayer.

No politicians are in touch with the populace because they drive and are driven by their own ideology first and foremost.


Edited by The Sash (16 Feb 2015 1.29pm)

OOooo I'll look for it..ta

That doesn't mean their out of touch though...it could be that the majority agree with them..but just too apathetic to vote for them.

 


The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 16 Feb 15 2.04pm

Quote The Sash at 16 Feb 2015 1.28pm

Quote Lyons550 at 16 Feb 2015 1.11pm

Quote serial thriller at 15 Feb 2015 11.39pm

Just in case you didn't realise...

[Link]

I don't even know where to begin. They are c*nts, out of touch, heartless, bloodthirsty c*nts of the highest order and I hope that Ed Milliband wins a landslide not because I like Labour, but just to rub in in these horrible conceited c*nts' faces that even a morally bankrupt party like Labour with a clown as leader is more popular than their brand of victimising, fear-inducing alienating politics.

F*ck you Cameron. F*ck you.


Are they out of touch ....or are you? Who's to say?

Mentioned it elsewhere - Charlie Brookers VT and summation of Millibands response to the yoof who asked him about what experience outside of politics made him suitable for PM is hilarious if you can find it in iplayer.

No politicians are in touch with the populace because they drive and are driven by their own ideology first and foremost.


Edited by The Sash (16 Feb 2015 1.29pm)

I don't think being in touch with the populace is generally the problem, its the assumption that somehow being in touch with the general population is important. The man in the street, he's a c**t.

Politicians spend to much time trying to 'be ordinary' as if somehow being able to 'drink a beer' or 'eat a bacon' sandwich is somehow important in state governance. This kind of popularism 'man in the street' nonsense is what destroys politics.

I don't want the people I like to drink a few pints with running the country, they're unreliable and prone to getting drunk on a 'school night'.

Instead we've slipped into this dangerous habit of electing 'people we like' rather than people who can do the job, and as a result we have an economy that is run by the kind of person who relies on Wonga to pay his bills, and calls in sick because he 'had a few too many last night'.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 16 Feb 15 2.05pm

Quote The Sash at 16 Feb 2015 1.28pm

Quote Lyons550 at 16 Feb 2015 1.11pm

Quote serial thriller at 15 Feb 2015 11.39pm

Just in case you didn't realise...

[Link]

I don't even know where to begin. They are c*nts, out of touch, heartless, bloodthirsty c*nts of the highest order and I hope that Ed Milliband wins a landslide not because I like Labour, but just to rub in in these horrible conceited c*nts' faces that even a morally bankrupt party like Labour with a clown as leader is more popular than their brand of victimising, fear-inducing alienating politics.

F*ck you Cameron. F*ck you.


Are they out of touch ....or are you? Who's to say?

Mentioned it elsewhere - Charlie Brookers VT and summation of Millibands response to the yoof who asked him about what experience outside of politics made him suitable for PM is hilarious if you can find it in iplayer.

No politicians are in touch with the populace because they drive and are driven by their own ideology first and foremost.


Edited by The Sash (16 Feb 2015 1.29pm)

Its very funny, and reminds me that whilst I hate the Conservatives, I really despise what Labour has become.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
The Sash Flag Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 16 Feb 15 2.11pm Send a Private Message to The Sash Add The Sash as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 16 Feb 2015 2.04pm

Quote The Sash at 16 Feb 2015 1.28pm

Quote Lyons550 at 16 Feb 2015 1.11pm

Quote serial thriller at 15 Feb 2015 11.39pm

Just in case you didn't realise...

[Link]

I don't even know where to begin. They are c*nts, out of touch, heartless, bloodthirsty c*nts of the highest order and I hope that Ed Milliband wins a landslide not because I like Labour, but just to rub in in these horrible conceited c*nts' faces that even a morally bankrupt party like Labour with a clown as leader is more popular than their brand of victimising, fear-inducing alienating politics.

F*ck you Cameron. F*ck you.


Are they out of touch ....or are you? Who's to say?

Mentioned it elsewhere - Charlie Brookers VT and summation of Millibands response to the yoof who asked him about what experience outside of politics made him suitable for PM is hilarious if you can find it in iplayer.

No politicians are in touch with the populace because they drive and are driven by their own ideology first and foremost.


Edited by The Sash (16 Feb 2015 1.29pm)

I don't think being in touch with the populace is generally the problem, its the assumption that somehow being in touch with the general population is important. The man in the street, he's a c**t.

Politicians spend to much time trying to 'be ordinary' as if somehow being able to 'drink a beer' or 'eat a bacon' sandwich is somehow important in state governance. This kind of popularism 'man in the street' nonsense is what destroys politics.

I don't want the people I like to drink a few pints with running the country, they're unreliable and prone to getting drunk on a 'school night'.

Instead we've slipped into this dangerous habit of electing 'people we like' rather than people who can do the job, and as a result we have an economy that is run by the kind of person who relies on Wonga to pay his bills, and calls in sick because he 'had a few too many last night'.


Actually I probably phrased that wrongly. They are removed from an 'everyday' experience is probably more apt, which makes their 'everyman' attempts so surreal.


Government is actually an area where we could take a leaf from the Premier League. For example, Economy wise I would like to see if we couldn't get a couple of German lads over the line before deadline day and ship Gideon and Balls out on loan to the global fiscal equivalent of Barnsley or Rotherham

 


As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stuk Flag Top half 16 Feb 15 2.15pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Brooker clip.

[Link]

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
pefwin Flag Where you have to have an English ... 16 Feb 15 2.20pm

Quote Jimenez at 16 Feb 2015 12.01am

Serial Thriller must be under 25 ....


oldguy-from-family-guy.jpg Attachment: oldguy-from-family-guy.jpg (19.80Kb)

 


"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 16 Feb 15 2.27pm

Quote imbored at 16 Feb 2015 12.49pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Feb 2015 12.12pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 16 Feb 2015 12.08pm

Quote Y Ddraig Goch at 16 Feb 2015 9.30am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 16 Feb 2015 9.23am

Quote We are goin up! at 16 Feb 2015 9.13am

How can anyone disagree with...

“Today it is still possible to leave school, sign on, find a flat, start claiming housing benefit and opt for a life on benefits. It’s time for bold action here,” he said. “We should ask, as we write our next manifesto, if that option should really exist at all.”

Also, this article is from 2013.

Its a shame that its not as possible though to leave school, find a job and afford to rent a flat. I wonder why people opt for the first scenario, when a tiny one bedroom flat around our way will set you back 750-1000 a month (or at least 350-400 a month in a shared house).

And that's before you throw in council tax, utilities and food.

Good luck affording one if you're a school leaver (or even a university graduate).


That's nothin new though. When I moved down to London in the mid 80s I was in a bedsit paying £60 a week when I only earned £120. I just had to suck it up and wait until I could afford to move.

I agree something needs to be done to make it easier but equally the sense of entitlement that a lot of people have needs to change.

That's half your weekly income. 750 quid is likely 3/4 plus of the likely income of a school leaver etc. And this is Reading, not London.

Somewhere affordable to live isn't 'self entitlement' its a necessity (especially when you'll need to pony up two months deposit and agency fees, likely another grand up front).

Its hardly surprising that people opt for the housing benefit route, rather than work 40 hours a week to be in debt at the end of the month.



Why should school leavers need somewhere to live?

I left school and lived with my parents till aged 22 when I had saved up enough for a deposit on my first house.

Not everyone is lucky enough to have parents that support them beyond their teenage years though.


Edited by imbored (16 Feb 2015 12.50pm)


They didn't support me.

It was made very clear to me that to stay in their house I had to get a job, pay them rent at the going rate and clear up after myself and take a fair share of the other household tasks.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 16 Feb 15 2.29pm

Quote The Sash at 16 Feb 2015 2.11pm

Actually I probably phrased that wrongly. They are removed from an 'everyday' experience is probably more apt, which makes their 'everyman' attempts so surreal.


Government is actually an area where we could take a leaf from the Premier League. For example, Economy wise I would like to see if we couldn't get a couple of German lads over the line before deadline day and ship Gideon and Balls out on loan to the global fiscal equivalent of Barnsley or Rotherham

I like the football analogy.

Everyday life is pretty s**t, it generally revolves around repeated boring tasks you do for money, with people you tolerate and a bit of skiving off to look at stuff on the internets.

Personally, politicians probably have too much of a diverse life experience compared to most working joes. They do seem to get out, socialize and talk to people a lot more, and spend less time getting utterly shucked on a Friday night.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
pefwin Flag Where you have to have an English ... 16 Feb 15 2.31pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Feb 2015 2.27pm

They didn't support me.

It was made very clear to me that to stay in their house I had to get a job, pay them rent at the going rate and clear up after myself and take a fair share of the other household tasks.


That's how it worked for me, and now works for my 6-year old.

 


"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 16 Feb 15 2.31pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Feb 2015 2.27pm

Quote imbored at 16 Feb 2015 12.49pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Feb 2015 12.12pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 16 Feb 2015 12.08pm

Quote Y Ddraig Goch at 16 Feb 2015 9.30am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 16 Feb 2015 9.23am

Quote We are goin up! at 16 Feb 2015 9.13am

How can anyone disagree with...

“Today it is still possible to leave school, sign on, find a flat, start claiming housing benefit and opt for a life on benefits. It’s time for bold action here,” he said. “We should ask, as we write our next manifesto, if that option should really exist at all.”

Also, this article is from 2013.

Its a shame that its not as possible though to leave school, find a job and afford to rent a flat. I wonder why people opt for the first scenario, when a tiny one bedroom flat around our way will set you back 750-1000 a month (or at least 350-400 a month in a shared house).

And that's before you throw in council tax, utilities and food.

Good luck affording one if you're a school leaver (or even a university graduate).


That's nothin new though. When I moved down to London in the mid 80s I was in a bedsit paying £60 a week when I only earned £120. I just had to suck it up and wait until I could afford to move.

I agree something needs to be done to make it easier but equally the sense of entitlement that a lot of people have needs to change.

That's half your weekly income. 750 quid is likely 3/4 plus of the likely income of a school leaver etc. And this is Reading, not London.

Somewhere affordable to live isn't 'self entitlement' its a necessity (especially when you'll need to pony up two months deposit and agency fees, likely another grand up front).

Its hardly surprising that people opt for the housing benefit route, rather than work 40 hours a week to be in debt at the end of the month.



Why should school leavers need somewhere to live?

I left school and lived with my parents till aged 22 when I had saved up enough for a deposit on my first house.

Not everyone is lucky enough to have parents that support them beyond their teenage years though.


Edited by imbored (16 Feb 2015 12.50pm)


They didn't support me.

It was made very clear to me that to stay in their house I had to get a job, pay them rent at the going rate and clear up after myself and take a fair share of the other household tasks.

Was the going rate, almost everything you earned plus food and bills. My parents were fairly 'serious' when I got my first job, I paid about a quarter of my take home a month in 'keep'.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 4 of 10 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > The Tories are w*nkers