You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Dave Whelan
November 24 2024 2.26am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Dave Whelan

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 4 of 15 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

  

Stuk Flag Top half 21 Nov 14 3.19pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote Ian J at 21 Nov 2014 2.31pm

Quote Pawson Palace at 21 Nov 2014 2.20pm

I'm always amused by people who get offended on others behalf.

From my experience the Chinese are the most racist lot going, closely followed by the Japanese.

I used to have a Chinese secretary who lived in fear that her father would find out that she was seeing an English lad

The worst example of racism (if you use the term in it's broadest sense to include religion) that I have come across recently was in the summer when England were playing cricket against India and Moeen Ali (British born pakistani) came out to bat for us and all of the (British born) Indians in the crowd started booing.

That's not racism, it's national rivalry. The (british born, or not) Indians were supporting India, not England and certainly not an Englishman with pakistani heritage.

A the Scotland v Ireland game last week, the Scots booed a Scottish born player representing Ireland instead.

Or England v Ghana, when Welbeck made his debut, for just general dislike of what feels like someone turning their back on the country and/or heritage.

Edited by Stuk (21 Nov 2014 3.25pm)

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Pawson Palace Flag Croydon 21 Nov 14 3.38pm Send a Private Message to Pawson Palace Add Pawson Palace as a friend

Quote Seth at 21 Nov 2014 3.19pm

Quote Pawson Palace at 21 Nov 2014 2.20pm

I'm always amused by people who get offended on others behalf.


I've seen this sentiment a few times on here and want to pick up on it.

If a white person is with a black friend and the black friend gets called a "n****r" by someone and the white person doesn't like it, is he being "offended on someone else's behalf"?

Were white people who campaigned against slavery being "offended on someone else's behalf"?

Was Oskar Schindler "offended on someone else's behalf"?

Was Nicholas Winton "offended on someone else's behalf"?

Were any non-Jews who fought against the Nazis "offended on someone else's behalf"?

If I object to my daughter being cat-called and leered at in the street am I "offended on someone else's behalf"?

My friend has a son who is gay. He was once beaten up in a club for his sexuality. I was angry at that. Am I "offended on someone else's behalf"?

If I campaign against animal cruelty am I "offended on someone else's behalf"?

If you donate to a charity which helps starving children, are you "offended on someone else's behalf"?

It seems that, according to the "offended on someone else's behalf" brigade, it's not right for anyone to empathise with or support someone who is suffering discrimination or violence. By this logic only Jews can protest at anti-semitism, only black people can fight racism and only gay people can campaign against homophobia. This is clearly a ridiculous position.

As for Whelan and Mackay, they are welcome to each other. I feel sorry for the ordinary Wigan fans who must be cringing at the thought of their club being associated with these kind of outdated and racist attitudes.


IMO the difference in all those scenarios is where malice is directly aimed at someone. Don't get me wrong, I'd be the first to jump into anyone of those situations to defend my friends and so forth.

Whelan saying chink in a generic context- where it's not specifically aimed at anyone person- and I think that is different. Had he said Ken Hom is a chink then that would be offensive.

Again, as above I've been told as a white guy I have no rhythm...are you going to accuse my black team mates and black coach as being racist?

 


Pride of South London
Upper Holmesdale Block P

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Midlands Eagle Flag 21 Nov 14 3.52pm Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

Quote Pawson Palace at 21 Nov 2014 2.39pm

Quote Ian J at 21 Nov 2014 2.31pm

Quote Pawson Palace at 21 Nov 2014 2.20pm

I'm always amused by people who get offended on others behalf.

From my experience the Chinese are the most racist lot going, closely followed by the Japanese.

I used to have a Chinese secretary who lived in fear that her father would find out that she was seeing an English lad

The worst example of racism (if you use the term in it's broadest sense to include religion) that I have come across recently was in the summer when England were playing cricket against India and Moeen Ali (British born pakistani) came out to bat for us and all of the (British born) Indians in the crowd started booing.


I didn't think the Chinese were so against the whites and deemed the lesser of the "foreign devils" which is one of my favourite labels I've ever been called haha.

For me the worst was watching Valencia play Real Betis years back and Patrick Klivert came on on Valencia and the crowd made really bad monkey noises. Now I can "understand" abusing an opposition player but your own? Bet they would have been cheering if he scored the winner. As it happened Pablo Aimar got the goal in a s***e game lol.

Hand on heart, I've never heard one piece of racist chanting at football in the UK. I do believe we are one, if not the most tolerant countries in Europe.


Spanish football supporters aren't very bright then and don't know their own history as a huge percentage of the Spanish population are descended from the Moors that invaded the country a few centuries ago

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Seth Flag On a pale blue dot 21 Nov 14 3.56pm Send a Private Message to Seth Add Seth as a friend

Quote Pawson Palace at 21 Nov 2014 3.38pm

Quote Seth at 21 Nov 2014 3.19pm

Quote Pawson Palace at 21 Nov 2014 2.20pm

I'm always amused by people who get offended on others behalf.


I've seen this sentiment a few times on here and want to pick up on it.

If a white person is with a black friend and the black friend gets called a "n****r" by someone and the white person doesn't like it, is he being "offended on someone else's behalf"?

Were white people who campaigned against slavery being "offended on someone else's behalf"?

Was Oskar Schindler "offended on someone else's behalf"?

Was Nicholas Winton "offended on someone else's behalf"?

Were any non-Jews who fought against the Nazis "offended on someone else's behalf"?

If I object to my daughter being cat-called and leered at in the street am I "offended on someone else's behalf"?

My friend has a son who is gay. He was once beaten up in a club for his sexuality. I was angry at that. Am I "offended on someone else's behalf"?

If I campaign against animal cruelty am I "offended on someone else's behalf"?

If you donate to a charity which helps starving children, are you "offended on someone else's behalf"?

It seems that, according to the "offended on someone else's behalf" brigade, it's not right for anyone to empathise with or support someone who is suffering discrimination or violence. By this logic only Jews can protest at anti-semitism, only black people can fight racism and only gay people can campaign against homophobia. This is clearly a ridiculous position.

As for Whelan and Mackay, they are welcome to each other. I feel sorry for the ordinary Wigan fans who must be cringing at the thought of their club being associated with these kind of outdated and racist attitudes.


IMO the difference in all those scenarios is where malice is directly aimed at someone. Don't get me wrong, I'd be the first to jump into anyone of those situations to defend my friends and so forth.

Whelan saying chink in a generic context- where it's not specifically aimed at anyone person- and I think that is different. Had he said Ken Hom is a chink then that would be offensive.

Again, as above I've been told as a white guy I have no rhythm...are you going to accuse my black team mates and black coach as being racist?


So by this reasoning would it would be ok for me to make a general remark about a group of people which is prejudiced, such as "black people are thieves" or "Jews are stingy", as long as it's not aimed at a particular individual? I can't agree with that. It's clearly still racist.

As for your last point, a couple of things come to mind: one definition of racism is "prejudice + power". Historically white people have had power over black people and have used that power to create a society based on discrimination. Some people therefore say that black people, being in a position of little power, cannot be racist. I don't agree with that in entirety, but do agree that anti-black racism from whites carries more weight in a historic and societal context than the other way round.

I would also ask: were you offended by it? If so, maybe you should take it up with your coach. If it's just banter and you genuinely don't mind, then I'd advise you to ignore it and get on with your life. But it's to do with how you experience it rather than whether it fits into your definition of racist or not. Much like the police count crimes as "hate crimes" depending on how the victim experienced it.

 


"You can feel the stadium jumping. The stadium is actually physically moving up and down"
FA Cup MOTD 24/4/16

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Midlands Eagle Flag 21 Nov 14 3.59pm Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

Quote Pawson Palace at 21 Nov 2014 3.38pm

Whelan saying chink in a generic context- where it's not specifically aimed at anyone person- and I think that is different. Had he said Ken Hom is a chink then that would be offensive.


Whelan was saying that he didn't think that the word "chink" was offensive which means that his usage wasn't racist

I used to be a regular on a forum dealing with a lot of Japanese equipment and most people referred to the Japanese as Japs which is a word that they find offensive but as the word was used in all innocence as the users were unaware of it's significance it was also not racist

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Midlands Eagle Flag 21 Nov 14 4.03pm Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

Quote Seth at 21 Nov 2014 3.56pm

a couple of things come to mind: one definition of racism is "prejudice + power". Historically white people have had power over black people and have used that power to create a society based on discrimination. Some people therefore say that black people, being in a position of little power, cannot be racist.

I'm not sure than Zimbabweans would agree with you and interestingly the most powerful man in the world is black.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Seth Flag On a pale blue dot 21 Nov 14 4.07pm Send a Private Message to Seth Add Seth as a friend

Quote Ian J at 21 Nov 2014 3.59pm

Quote Pawson Palace at 21 Nov 2014 3.38pm

Whelan saying chink in a generic context- where it's not specifically aimed at anyone person- and I think that is different. Had he said Ken Hom is a chink then that would be offensive.


Whelan was saying that he didn't think that the word "chink" was offensive which means that his usage wasn't racist

I used to be a regular on a forum dealing with a lot of Japanese equipment and most people referred to the Japanese as Japs which is a word that they find offensive but as the word was used in all innocence as the users were unaware of it's significance it was also not racist

Unfortunately for Whelan, and the people on the forum you mention, it's not up to them whether a word is racist or not - it's up to the people the word refers to. Chinese people think "chink" is racist, just like Asians think "p*ki" is racist, Japanese people think "Jap" is racist and black people think "n****r" is racist. Therefore they are racist and ignorance of that fact is not a valid defence.

 


"You can feel the stadium jumping. The stadium is actually physically moving up and down"
FA Cup MOTD 24/4/16

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Mapletree Flag Croydon 21 Nov 14 4.07pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Quote Ian J at 21 Nov 2014 3.52pm

Quote Pawson Palace at 21 Nov 2014 2.39pm

Quote Ian J at 21 Nov 2014 2.31pm

Quote Pawson Palace at 21 Nov 2014 2.20pm

I'm always amused by people who get offended on others behalf.

From my experience the Chinese are the most racist lot going, closely followed by the Japanese.

I used to have a Chinese secretary who lived in fear that her father would find out that she was seeing an English lad

The worst example of racism (if you use the term in it's broadest sense to include religion) that I have come across recently was in the summer when England were playing cricket against India and Moeen Ali (British born pakistani) came out to bat for us and all of the (British born) Indians in the crowd started booing.


I didn't think the Chinese were so against the whites and deemed the lesser of the "foreign devils" which is one of my favourite labels I've ever been called haha.

For me the worst was watching Valencia play Real Betis years back and Patrick Klivert came on on Valencia and the crowd made really bad monkey noises. Now I can "understand" abusing an opposition player but your own? Bet they would have been cheering if he scored the winner. As it happened Pablo Aimar got the goal in a s***e game lol.

Hand on heart, I've never heard one piece of racist chanting at football in the UK. I do believe we are one, if not the most tolerant countries in Europe.


Spanish football supporters aren't very bright then and don't know their own history as a huge percentage of the Spanish population are descended from the Moors that invaded the country a few centuries ago


I thought you were going to say are descended from monkeys, which in the grander scale of things of course is true.

Edited by Mapletree (21 Nov 2014 4.08pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Seth Flag On a pale blue dot 21 Nov 14 4.09pm Send a Private Message to Seth Add Seth as a friend

Quote Ian J at 21 Nov 2014 4.03pm

Quote Seth at 21 Nov 2014 3.56pm

a couple of things come to mind: one definition of racism is "prejudice + power". Historically white people have had power over black people and have used that power to create a society based on discrimination. Some people therefore say that black people, being in a position of little power, cannot be racist.

I'm not sure than Zimbabweans would agree with you and interestingly the most powerful man in the world is black.



There are anomalies and exceptions of course but over the course of recent history (ie the last few hundred years) whites have held far more power than blacks and this is reflected in the comparative wealth and power of, for example, European and African nations and institutions.

 


"You can feel the stadium jumping. The stadium is actually physically moving up and down"
FA Cup MOTD 24/4/16

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Mapletree Flag Croydon 21 Nov 14 4.10pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Quote Seth at 21 Nov 2014 4.07pm

Quote Ian J at 21 Nov 2014 3.59pm

Quote Pawson Palace at 21 Nov 2014 3.38pm

Whelan saying chink in a generic context- where it's not specifically aimed at anyone person- and I think that is different. Had he said Ken Hom is a chink then that would be offensive.


Whelan was saying that he didn't think that the word "chink" was offensive which means that his usage wasn't racist

I used to be a regular on a forum dealing with a lot of Japanese equipment and most people referred to the Japanese as Japs which is a word that they find offensive but as the word was used in all innocence as the users were unaware of it's significance it was also not racist

Unfortunately for Whelan, and the people on the forum you mention, it's not up to them whether a word is racist or not - it's up to the people the word refers to. Chinese people think "chink" is racist, just like Asians think "p*ki" is racist, Japanese people think "Jap" is racist and black people think "n****r" is racist. Therefore they are racist and ignorance of that fact is not a valid defence.


Can't disagree but I do notice that the papers have gone for rent-a-quote organisations to find people to assert that Whelan was being racist. I do feel uncomfortable how many organisations only exist due to racism and therefore have a vested interest in perpetuating endless discussions about it.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Pawson Palace Flag Croydon 21 Nov 14 4.12pm Send a Private Message to Pawson Palace Add Pawson Palace as a friend

Quote Seth at 21 Nov 2014 3.56pm

Quote Pawson Palace at 21 Nov 2014 3.38pm

Quote Seth at 21 Nov 2014 3.19pm

Quote Pawson Palace at 21 Nov 2014 2.20pm

I'm always amused by people who get offended on others behalf.


I've seen this sentiment a few times on here and want to pick up on it.

If a white person is with a black friend and the black friend gets called a "n****r" by someone and the white person doesn't like it, is he being "offended on someone else's behalf"?

Were white people who campaigned against slavery being "offended on someone else's behalf"?

Was Oskar Schindler "offended on someone else's behalf"?

Was Nicholas Winton "offended on someone else's behalf"?

Were any non-Jews who fought against the Nazis "offended on someone else's behalf"?

If I object to my daughter being cat-called and leered at in the street am I "offended on someone else's behalf"?

My friend has a son who is gay. He was once beaten up in a club for his sexuality. I was angry at that. Am I "offended on someone else's behalf"?

If I campaign against animal cruelty am I "offended on someone else's behalf"?

If you donate to a charity which helps starving children, are you "offended on someone else's behalf"?

It seems that, according to the "offended on someone else's behalf" brigade, it's not right for anyone to empathise with or support someone who is suffering discrimination or violence. By this logic only Jews can protest at anti-semitism, only black people can fight racism and only gay people can campaign against homophobia. This is clearly a ridiculous position.

As for Whelan and Mackay, they are welcome to each other. I feel sorry for the ordinary Wigan fans who must be cringing at the thought of their club being associated with these kind of outdated and racist attitudes.


IMO the difference in all those scenarios is where malice is directly aimed at someone. Don't get me wrong, I'd be the first to jump into anyone of those situations to defend my friends and so forth.

Whelan saying chink in a generic context- where it's not specifically aimed at anyone person- and I think that is different. Had he said Ken Hom is a chink then that would be offensive.

Again, as above I've been told as a white guy I have no rhythm...are you going to accuse my black team mates and black coach as being racist?


So by this reasoning would it would be ok for me to make a general remark about a group of people which is prejudiced, such as "black people are thieves" or "Jews are stingy", as long as it's not aimed at a particular individual? I can't agree with that. It's clearly still racist.

As for your last point, a couple of things come to mind: one definition of racism is "prejudice + power". Historically white people have had power over black people and have used that power to create a society based on discrimination. Some people therefore say that black people, being in a position of little power, cannot be racist. I don't agree with that in entirety, but do agree that anti-black racism from whites carries more weight in a historic and societal context than the other way round.

I would also ask: were you offended by it? If so, maybe you should take it up with your coach. If it's just banter and you genuinely don't mind, then I'd advise you to ignore it and get on with your life. But it's to do with how you experience it rather than whether it fits into your definition of racist or not. Much like the police count crimes as "hate crimes" depending on how the victim experienced it.


He wasn't using chink at anyone, he said the word chink in a broader context in conversation. Are we going to remove any word that someone finds offensive from our vocabulary? Where will it stop?

As for the Jew comment, he said they love money, English people love money, we all love money. How is that bad? He hasn't singled anyone out!

Well by what you're saying- you should go and report them for being racist because you should find that offensive on my behalf. That is no different to what Whelan has said, so if you find him racist you find them racist there is no distinction.

As for saying minorities can't be racist that's beyond ironic. Being racist is mistreating people on basis of their colour or creed. So to then say anyone who isn't white can't be racist is treating white people differently which is surely racist in itself as everyone is not being treated the same.

 


Pride of South London
Upper Holmesdale Block P

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 21 Nov 14 4.14pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Quote Mapletree at 21 Nov 2014 4.10pm

Quote Seth at 21 Nov 2014 4.07pm

Quote Ian J at 21 Nov 2014 3.59pm

Quote Pawson Palace at 21 Nov 2014 3.38pm

Whelan saying chink in a generic context- where it's not specifically aimed at anyone person- and I think that is different. Had he said Ken Hom is a chink then that would be offensive.


Whelan was saying that he didn't think that the word "chink" was offensive which means that his usage wasn't racist

I used to be a regular on a forum dealing with a lot of Japanese equipment and most people referred to the Japanese as Japs which is a word that they find offensive but as the word was used in all innocence as the users were unaware of it's significance it was also not racist

Unfortunately for Whelan, and the people on the forum you mention, it's not up to them whether a word is racist or not - it's up to the people the word refers to. Chinese people think "chink" is racist, just like Asians think "p*ki" is racist, Japanese people think "Jap" is racist and black people think "n****r" is racist. Therefore they are racist and ignorance of that fact is not a valid defence.


Can't disagree but I do notice that the papers have gone for rent-a-quote organisations to find people to assert that Whelan was being racist. I do feel uncomfortable how many organisations only exist due to racism and therefore have a vested interest in perpetuating endless discussions about it.


So we are told what is offensive by those who are supposedly offended. Can anyone see the problem with this ?
It is a purely self serving vehicle. It allows anyone to behave how they like and then claim racism or prejudice if anyone objects. A more absurd state of affairs I can't imagine.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 4 of 15 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Dave Whelan