Got what we deserved

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Got what we deserved

Page 4 of 10 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 22 Mar 14 7.08pm
Quote FinchleyEagle at 22 Mar 2014 6.17pm I don't think maxipalace is a real person. I think hes part of HOL in order to get more replies and therefore help with getting advertising. Every now and then a computer program spits out a random word generator loop. While this loop has been honed over 10 years and is pretty good at seeming to be a fan, its complete and utter lack of football knowledge and controversial posts give it away. Good one HOL, but we now have 'advertiser sport' that does the same job and is probably enough. You can delete the 'maxipalace' program now, its pretty dull and irrelevent. Cheers He definitely exists. I've met him. Seems a sound fella.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 22 Mar 14 7.08pm

Quote FinchleyEagle at 22 Mar 2014 6.17pm

I don't think maxipalace is a real person. I think hes part of HOL in order to get more replies and therefore help with getting advertising.

Every now and then a computer program spits out a random word generator loop. While this loop has been honed over 10 years and is pretty good at seeming to be a fan, its complete and utter lack of football knowledge and controversial posts give it away.

Good one HOL, but we now have 'advertiser sport' that does the same job and is probably enough.

You can delete the 'maxipalace' program now, its pretty dull and irrelevent.

Cheers

He definitely exists. I've met him. Seems a sound fella.

Alert a moderator to this post

The Sash Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 22 Mar 14 7.10pm
Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 22 Mar 2014 7.06pm Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 7.05pm Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 7.01pm Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 6.58pm Quote maxipalace at 22 Mar 2014 6.55pm Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 6.51pm Quote maxipalace at 22 Mar 2014 6.04pm Nowt Oh don't be silly No Murray or Ince in starting line up. Its all wrong Irrelevant - you said we got what we deserved - nowt - when patently we didn't get what we deserved which was a point at least Its just getting tedious..if you had the same moan about last week I would have agreed 100% but today we pushed them higher up the pitch, made sure we got bodies in the box and actually counter attacked rather than hoof the ball away and wait for the next attack. They had a couple of sights of goal as did we Sash 21 compared to 8. 73 per cent possession against us and you really think we deserved something Edited by wainesworld (22 Mar 2014 7.02pm) Did you watch the game ??? I presume you did ?? How much of the 73% possession was them going backwards or in their own half - the beauty of squeezing them higher up is that they played most of their football in the middle third or own half- how many times their 'killer' ball went out or to us This week for periods we actually kept the ball, we actually found our men and carved out decent chances that if we have a decent CF could have, scrub that, should have scored. And how many of their 21 shots were speculative 25 yard efforts? Stats never tell the whole story. Indeed - If some of Tiotes or Gouffrans had gone any higher the HF would have about 8 balls to bring back with them As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014
Alert a moderator to this post

The Sash

Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 22 Mar 14 7.10pm

Quote EverybodyDannsNow at 22 Mar 2014 7.06pm

Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 7.05pm

Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 7.01pm

Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 6.58pm

Quote maxipalace at 22 Mar 2014 6.55pm

Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 6.51pm

Quote maxipalace at 22 Mar 2014 6.04pm

Nowt

Oh don't be silly

No Murray or Ince in starting line up. Its all wrong

Irrelevant - you said we got what we deserved - nowt - when patently we didn't get what we deserved which was a point at least

Its just getting tedious..if you had the same moan about last week I would have agreed 100% but today we pushed them higher up the pitch, made sure we got bodies in the box and actually counter attacked rather than hoof the ball away and wait for the next attack.

They had a couple of sights of goal as did we

Sash 21 compared to 8. 73 per cent possession against us and you really think we deserved something

Edited by wainesworld (22 Mar 2014 7.02pm)

Did you watch the game ??? I presume you did ??

How much of the 73% possession was them going backwards or in their own half - the beauty of squeezing them higher up is that they played most of their football in the middle third or own half- how many times their 'killer' ball went out or to us

This week for periods we actually kept the ball, we actually found our men and carved out decent chances that if we have a decent CF could have, scrub that, should have scored.

And how many of their 21 shots were speculative 25 yard efforts?

Stats never tell the whole story.

Indeed - If some of Tiotes or Gouffrans had gone any higher the HF would have about 8 balls to bring back with them

As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014

Alert a moderator to this post

Icepick Tony Chester 22 Mar 14 7.12pm
Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 7.01pm Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 6.58pm Quote maxipalace at 22 Mar 2014 6.55pm Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 6.51pm Quote maxipalace at 22 Mar 2014 6.04pm Nowt Oh don't be silly No Murray or Ince in starting line up. Its all wrong Irrelevant - you said we got what we deserved - nowt - when patently we didn't get what we deserved which was a point at least Its just getting tedious..if you had the same moan about last week I would have agreed 100% but today we pushed them higher up the pitch, made sure we got bodies in the box and actually counter attacked rather than hoof the ball away and wait for the next attack. They had a couple of sights of goal as did we Sash 21 compared to 8. 73 per cent possession against us and you really think we deserved something Edited by wainesworld (22 Mar 2014 7.02pm) Stats, as have been discussed many times, are very misleading. We played Barnsley at home last season and had near on 30 shots and it ended 0-0. Why? 'cos most of our shots were at the keeper or high wide and not so hansom. Newcastle had as many clear-cut chances as us today, Jules didn't have to make any spectacular saves really and nor did Krul. We never dominate possession as that is not our gameplan. Reason is that we really really do not have enough quality in the side to even think about doing it, let alone attempt it. For them to only score after the final whistle should have gone says, we deserved something out of the game. "They got his own song 'He's just too good for you', it's quite unbelievable but when you see it and he's facing up someone - I actually feel sorry for them, 'Cos he actually is" - Ian Holloway
Alert a moderator to this post

Icepick Tony

Chester 22 Mar 14 7.12pm

Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 7.01pm

Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 6.58pm

Quote maxipalace at 22 Mar 2014 6.55pm

Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 6.51pm

Quote maxipalace at 22 Mar 2014 6.04pm

Nowt

Oh don't be silly

No Murray or Ince in starting line up. Its all wrong

Irrelevant - you said we got what we deserved - nowt - when patently we didn't get what we deserved which was a point at least

They had a couple of sights of goal as did we

Sash 21 compared to 8. 73 per cent possession against us and you really think we deserved something

Edited by wainesworld (22 Mar 2014 7.02pm)

Stats, as have been discussed many times, are very misleading. We played Barnsley at home last season and had near on 30 shots and it ended 0-0. Why? 'cos most of our shots were at the keeper or high wide and not so hansom. Newcastle had as many clear-cut chances as us today, Jules didn't have to make any spectacular saves really and nor did Krul. We never dominate possession as that is not our gameplan. Reason is that we really really do not have enough quality in the side to even think about doing it, let alone attempt it.

For them to only score after the final whistle should have gone says, we deserved something out of the game.

"They got his own song 'He's just too good for you', it's quite unbelievable but when you see it and he's facing up someone - I actually feel sorry for them, 'Cos he actually is" - Ian Holloway

Alert a moderator to this post

maxipalace in a box 22 Mar 14 7.19pm
Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 7.06pm Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 7.03pm Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 7.00pm Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 6.53pm Quote Icepick Tony at 22 Mar 2014 6.49pm Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 6.46pm How can he be wrong? they had 73 per cent possession with 20 odd shots on goal ffs take your rose tinted specs off we got off lightly again. We can not draw our way to safety we actually need to try and win some games. Jesus what game were you lot watching Sorry, what game were you watching? They had 8 shots on target and we both hit the bar and missed 1-on-1's. Sorry me bad they did actually have 21 shots at goal cause you don't shot anywhere else 8 on target compared to 8 shots 1 on target yer we deserved all three points didn't we clowns Edited by wainesworld (22 Mar 2014 6.54pm) You don't seem to have the emotional maturity for football, let alone Palace. I would suggest curling might be a better option for you So when facts are aimed against your statements you resort to slander nice one mate keep up the good work cant wait to read your reply to that Sorry but when such knee jerk, dribbling imbecility that flies so far in the face of what actually went on is displayed it can only be that you have the emotional capabilities to handle upset of an 8 year old girl - its about the only conclusion anyone can draw Oh and it would be libel NOT slander btw - just in case you want to take me to court Edited by The Sash (22 Mar 2014 7.09pm) [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

maxipalace

in a box 22 Mar 14 7.19pm

Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 7.06pm

Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 7.03pm

Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 7.00pm

Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 6.53pm

Quote Icepick Tony at 22 Mar 2014 6.49pm

Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 6.46pm

How can he be wrong? they had 73 per cent possession with 20 odd shots on goal ffs take your rose tinted specs off we got off lightly again. We can not draw our way to safety we actually need to try and win some games.

Jesus what game were you lot watching

Sorry, what game were you watching? They had 8 shots on target and we both hit the bar and missed 1-on-1's.

Sorry me bad they did actually have 21 shots at goal cause you don't shot anywhere else 8 on target compared to 8 shots 1 on target yer we deserved all three points didn't we clowns

Edited by wainesworld (22 Mar 2014 6.54pm)

You don't seem to have the emotional maturity for football, let alone Palace.

I would suggest curling might be a better option for you

So when facts are aimed against your statements you resort to slander nice one mate keep up the good work cant wait to read your reply to that

Sorry but when such knee jerk, dribbling imbecility that flies so far in the face of what actually went on is displayed it can only be that you have the emotional capabilities to handle upset of an 8 year old girl - its about the only conclusion anyone can draw

Oh and it would be libel NOT slander btw - just in case you want to take me to court

Edited by The Sash (22 Mar 2014 7.09pm)

[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

The Sash Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 22 Mar 14 7.22pm
Quote maxipalace at 22 Mar 2014 7.19pm Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 7.06pm Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 7.03pm Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 7.00pm Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 6.53pm Quote Icepick Tony at 22 Mar 2014 6.49pm Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 6.46pm How can he be wrong? they had 73 per cent possession with 20 odd shots on goal ffs take your rose tinted specs off we got off lightly again. We can not draw our way to safety we actually need to try and win some games. Jesus what game were you lot watching Sorry, what game were you watching? They had 8 shots on target and we both hit the bar and missed 1-on-1's. Sorry me bad they did actually have 21 shots at goal cause you don't shot anywhere else 8 on target compared to 8 shots 1 on target yer we deserved all three points didn't we clowns Edited by wainesworld (22 Mar 2014 6.54pm) You don't seem to have the emotional maturity for football, let alone Palace. I would suggest curling might be a better option for you So when facts are aimed against your statements you resort to slander nice one mate keep up the good work cant wait to read your reply to that Sorry but when such knee jerk, dribbling imbecility that flies so far in the face of what actually went on is displayed it can only be that you have the emotional capabilities to handle upset of an 8 year old girl - its about the only conclusion anyone can draw Oh and it would be libel NOT slander btw - just in case you want to take me to court Edited by The Sash (22 Mar 2014 7.09pm) [Link] ...and ????? I saw the game - I don't need Sky's statistics - but if you do want to go all 'Sky' - Merson, who watched the game apparently said we were excellent - I wouldn't go that far but we played well and deserved a point Edited by The Sash (22 Mar 2014 7.25pm) As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014
Alert a moderator to this post

The Sash

Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 22 Mar 14 7.22pm

Quote maxipalace at 22 Mar 2014 7.19pm

Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 7.06pm

Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 7.03pm

Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 7.00pm

Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 6.53pm

Quote Icepick Tony at 22 Mar 2014 6.49pm

Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 6.46pm

Jesus what game were you lot watching

Sorry, what game were you watching? They had 8 shots on target and we both hit the bar and missed 1-on-1's.

Sorry me bad they did actually have 21 shots at goal cause you don't shot anywhere else 8 on target compared to 8 shots 1 on target yer we deserved all three points didn't we clowns

Edited by wainesworld (22 Mar 2014 6.54pm)

You don't seem to have the emotional maturity for football, let alone Palace.

I would suggest curling might be a better option for you

So when facts are aimed against your statements you resort to slander nice one mate keep up the good work cant wait to read your reply to that

Oh and it would be libel NOT slander btw - just in case you want to take me to court

Edited by The Sash (22 Mar 2014 7.09pm)

[Link]

...and ????? I saw the game - I don't need Sky's statistics - but if you do want to go all 'Sky' - Merson, who watched the game apparently said we were excellent - I wouldn't go that far but we played well and deserved a point

Edited by The Sash (22 Mar 2014 7.25pm)

As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014

Alert a moderator to this post

Slimey Toad Karsiyaka, North Cyprus 22 Mar 14 7.25pm
Quote maxipalace at 22 Mar 2014 7.19pm Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 7.06pm Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 7.03pm Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 7.00pm Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 6.53pm Quote Icepick Tony at 22 Mar 2014 6.49pm Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 6.46pm How can he be wrong? they had 73 per cent possession with 20 odd shots on goal ffs take your rose tinted specs off we got off lightly again. We can not draw our way to safety we actually need to try and win some games. Jesus what game were you lot watching Sorry, what game were you watching? They had 8 shots on target and we both hit the bar and missed 1-on-1's. Sorry me bad they did actually have 21 shots at goal cause you don't shot anywhere else 8 on target compared to 8 shots 1 on target yer we deserved all three points didn't we clowns Edited by wainesworld (22 Mar 2014 6.54pm) You don't seem to have the emotional maturity for football, let alone Palace. I would suggest curling might be a better option for you So when facts are aimed against your statements you resort to slander nice one mate keep up the good work cant wait to read your reply to that Sorry but when such knee jerk, dribbling imbecility that flies so far in the face of what actually went on is displayed it can only be that you have the emotional capabilities to handle upset of an 8 year old girl - its about the only conclusion anyone can draw Oh and it would be libel NOT slander btw - just in case you want to take me to court Edited by The Sash (22 Mar 2014 7.09pm) [Link] Why do managers come out with this bollox that 'we were the team that wanted to win it'. Even when we don't look like we're trying to win, we still want to.
Alert a moderator to this post

Slimey Toad

Karsiyaka, North Cyprus 22 Mar 14 7.25pm

Quote maxipalace at 22 Mar 2014 7.19pm

Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 7.06pm

Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 7.03pm

Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 7.00pm

Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 6.53pm

Quote Icepick Tony at 22 Mar 2014 6.49pm

Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 6.46pm

Jesus what game were you lot watching

Sorry, what game were you watching? They had 8 shots on target and we both hit the bar and missed 1-on-1's.

Sorry me bad they did actually have 21 shots at goal cause you don't shot anywhere else 8 on target compared to 8 shots 1 on target yer we deserved all three points didn't we clowns

Edited by wainesworld (22 Mar 2014 6.54pm)

You don't seem to have the emotional maturity for football, let alone Palace.

I would suggest curling might be a better option for you

So when facts are aimed against your statements you resort to slander nice one mate keep up the good work cant wait to read your reply to that

Oh and it would be libel NOT slander btw - just in case you want to take me to court

Edited by The Sash (22 Mar 2014 7.09pm)

[Link]

Why do managers come out with this bollox that 'we were the team that wanted to win it'. Even when we don't look like we're trying to win, we still want to.

Alert a moderator to this post

Lyons550 Shirley 22 Mar 14 7.26pm
Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 6.46pm How can he be wrong? they had 73 per cent possession with 20 odd shots on goal ffs take your rose tinted specs off we got off lightly again. We can not draw our way to safety we actually need to try and win some games. Jesus what game were you lot watching Lol..that made me laugh!!! The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World
Alert a moderator to this post

Lyons550

Shirley 22 Mar 14 7.26pm

Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 6.46pm

How can he be wrong? they had 73 per cent possession with 20 odd shots on goal ffs take your rose tinted specs off we got off lightly again. We can not draw our way to safety we actually need to try and win some games.

Jesus what game were you lot watching

Lol..that made me laugh!!!

The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World

Alert a moderator to this post

reginald_maudling 22 Mar 14 7.27pm
BBC website... "Newcastle had failed to score in eight of their 11 previous Premier League games and had scored just once in their last five fixtures at St James' Park " playing for the nil-nil wasn't necessary or wise
Alert a moderator to this post

reginald_maudling

22 Mar 14 7.27pm

Send a Private Message to reginald_maudling

BBC website...

"Newcastle had failed to score in eight of their 11 previous Premier League games and had scored just once in their last five fixtures at St James' Park "

playing for the nil-nil wasn't necessary or wise

Alert a moderator to this post

EverybodyDannsNow SE19 22 Mar 14 7.28pm
Quote reginald_maudling at 22 Mar 2014 7.27pm BBC website... "Newcastle had failed to score in eight of their 11 previous Premier League games and had scored just once in their last five fixtures at St James' Park " playing for the nil-nil wasn't necessary or wise Which is why we didn't do it.
Alert a moderator to this post

EverybodyDannsNow

SE19 22 Mar 14 7.28pm

Send a Private Message to EverybodyDannsNow

Quote reginald_maudling at 22 Mar 2014 7.27pm

BBC website...

"Newcastle had failed to score in eight of their 11 previous Premier League games and had scored just once in their last five fixtures at St James' Park "

playing for the nil-nil wasn't necessary or wise

Which is why we didn't do it.

Alert a moderator to this post

The Sash Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 22 Mar 14 7.28pm
Quote Slimey Toad at 22 Mar 2014 7.25pm Quote maxipalace at 22 Mar 2014 7.19pm Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 7.06pm Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 7.03pm Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 7.00pm Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 6.53pm Quote Icepick Tony at 22 Mar 2014 6.49pm Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 6.46pm How can he be wrong? they had 73 per cent possession with 20 odd shots on goal ffs take your rose tinted specs off we got off lightly again. We can not draw our way to safety we actually need to try and win some games. Jesus what game were you lot watching Sorry, what game were you watching? They had 8 shots on target and we both hit the bar and missed 1-on-1's. Sorry me bad they did actually have 21 shots at goal cause you don't shot anywhere else 8 on target compared to 8 shots 1 on target yer we deserved all three points didn't we clowns Edited by wainesworld (22 Mar 2014 6.54pm) You don't seem to have the emotional maturity for football, let alone Palace. I would suggest curling might be a better option for you So when facts are aimed against your statements you resort to slander nice one mate keep up the good work cant wait to read your reply to that Sorry but when such knee jerk, dribbling imbecility that flies so far in the face of what actually went on is displayed it can only be that you have the emotional capabilities to handle upset of an 8 year old girl - its about the only conclusion anyone can draw Oh and it would be libel NOT slander btw - just in case you want to take me to court Edited by The Sash (22 Mar 2014 7.09pm) [Link] Why do managers come out with this bollox that 'we were the team that wanted to win it'. Even when we don't look like we're trying to win, we still want to. Indeed - I bet Pulis was over the moon when Bolassies shot hit the bar and Krul saved from KG or Jeromes header went wide or Puncheon shalshed wide or Jerome tried to shoot instead of playing in KG or Bolassie - If one of those good opportunities had gone in it would have ruined his game plan of not wanting to win it - then where would be ??? As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014
Alert a moderator to this post

The Sash

Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 22 Mar 14 7.28pm

Quote Slimey Toad at 22 Mar 2014 7.25pm

Quote maxipalace at 22 Mar 2014 7.19pm

Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 7.06pm

Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 7.03pm

Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 7.00pm

Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 6.53pm

Quote Icepick Tony at 22 Mar 2014 6.49pm

Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 6.46pm

Jesus what game were you lot watching

Sorry, what game were you watching? They had 8 shots on target and we both hit the bar and missed 1-on-1's.

Sorry me bad they did actually have 21 shots at goal cause you don't shot anywhere else 8 on target compared to 8 shots 1 on target yer we deserved all three points didn't we clowns

Edited by wainesworld (22 Mar 2014 6.54pm)

You don't seem to have the emotional maturity for football, let alone Palace.

I would suggest curling might be a better option for you

So when facts are aimed against your statements you resort to slander nice one mate keep up the good work cant wait to read your reply to that

Oh and it would be libel NOT slander btw - just in case you want to take me to court

Edited by The Sash (22 Mar 2014 7.09pm)

[Link]

Why do managers come out with this bollox that 'we were the team that wanted to win it'. Even when we don't look like we're trying to win, we still want to.

Indeed - I bet Pulis was over the moon when Bolassies shot hit the bar and Krul saved from KG or Jeromes header went wide or Puncheon shalshed wide or Jerome tried to shoot instead of playing in KG or Bolassie - If one of those good opportunities had gone in it would have ruined his game plan of not wanting to win it - then where would be ???

As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014

Alert a moderator to this post

maxipalace in a box 22 Mar 14 7.30pm
Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 7.22pm Quote maxipalace at 22 Mar 2014 7.19pm Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 7.06pm Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 7.03pm Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 7.00pm Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 6.53pm Quote Icepick Tony at 22 Mar 2014 6.49pm Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 6.46pm How can he be wrong? they had 73 per cent possession with 20 odd shots on goal ffs take your rose tinted specs off we got off lightly again. We can not draw our way to safety we actually need to try and win some games. Jesus what game were you lot watching Sorry, what game were you watching? They had 8 shots on target and we both hit the bar and missed 1-on-1's. Sorry me bad they did actually have 21 shots at goal cause you don't shot anywhere else 8 on target compared to 8 shots 1 on target yer we deserved all three points didn't we clowns Edited by wainesworld (22 Mar 2014 6.54pm) You don't seem to have the emotional maturity for football, let alone Palace. I would suggest curling might be a better option for you So when facts are aimed against your statements you resort to slander nice one mate keep up the good work cant wait to read your reply to that Sorry but when such knee jerk, dribbling imbecility that flies so far in the face of what actually went on is displayed it can only be that you have the emotional capabilities to handle upset of an 8 year old girl - its about the only conclusion anyone can draw Oh and it would be libel NOT slander btw - just in case you want to take me to court Edited by The Sash (22 Mar 2014 7.09pm) [Link] ...and ????? I saw the game - I don't need Sky's statistics - but if you do want to go all 'Sky' - Merson, who watched the game apparently said we were excellent - I wouldn't go that far but we played well and deserved a point Edited by The Sash (22 Mar 2014 7.25pm) They said they deserved to win.
Alert a moderator to this post

maxipalace

in a box 22 Mar 14 7.30pm

Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 7.22pm

Quote maxipalace at 22 Mar 2014 7.19pm

Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 7.06pm

Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 7.03pm

Quote The Sash at 22 Mar 2014 7.00pm

Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 6.53pm

Quote Icepick Tony at 22 Mar 2014 6.49pm

Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 6.46pm

Jesus what game were you lot watching

Sorry, what game were you watching? They had 8 shots on target and we both hit the bar and missed 1-on-1's.

Sorry me bad they did actually have 21 shots at goal cause you don't shot anywhere else 8 on target compared to 8 shots 1 on target yer we deserved all three points didn't we clowns

Edited by wainesworld (22 Mar 2014 6.54pm)

You don't seem to have the emotional maturity for football, let alone Palace.

I would suggest curling might be a better option for you

So when facts are aimed against your statements you resort to slander nice one mate keep up the good work cant wait to read your reply to that

Oh and it would be libel NOT slander btw - just in case you want to take me to court

Edited by The Sash (22 Mar 2014 7.09pm)

[Link]

Edited by The Sash (22 Mar 2014 7.25pm)

They said they deserved to win.

Alert a moderator to this post

The Sash Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 22 Mar 14 7.30pm
Quote Lyons550 at 22 Mar 2014 7.26pm Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 6.46pm How can he be wrong? they had 73 per cent possession with 20 odd shots on goal ffs take your rose tinted specs off we got off lightly again. We can not draw our way to safety we actually need to try and win some games. Jesus what game were you watching Lol..that made me laugh!!! I think Jesus was watching Hull v West Brom - big Baggies fan the son of god Edited by The Sash (22 Mar 2014 7.30pm) As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014
Alert a moderator to this post

The Sash

Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 22 Mar 14 7.30pm

Quote Lyons550 at 22 Mar 2014 7.26pm

Quote wainesworld at 22 Mar 2014 6.46pm

Jesus what game were you watching

Lol..that made me laugh!!!

I think Jesus was watching Hull v West Brom - big Baggies fan the son of god

Edited by The Sash (22 Mar 2014 7.30pm)

As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 4 of 10 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Got what we deserved

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors