Topic

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 392 of 2586 < 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 >

Topic Locked

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 20 Oct 16 2.59pm
Originally posted by carlonoil I don't think they publicise their hidden agenda. I don't agree with any of their policies. I partly agree with their EU policy, but in addition to opposing a "monopoly capitalist United States of Europe", I would also oppose a communist United States of Europe, or any other type of United States of Europe for that matter. You don't agree with planning for future energy needs. But bizarre but your prerogative. You don't agree with the majority of those polled about renationalisaton of essential services. Fair enough.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 20 Oct 16 2.59pm

Originally posted by carlonoil

I don't think they publicise their hidden agenda.

I don't agree with any of their policies. I partly agree with their EU policy, but in addition to opposing a "monopoly capitalist United States of Europe", I would also oppose a communist United States of Europe, or any other type of United States of Europe for that matter.

You don't agree with planning for future energy needs. But bizarre but your prerogative. You don't agree with the majority of those polled about renationalisaton of essential services. Fair enough.

Alert a moderator to this post

carlonoil Naples 20 Oct 16 3.22pm
Originally posted by nickgusset You don't agree with planning for future energy needs. But bizarre but your prerogative. You don't agree with the majority of those polled about renationalisaton of essential services. Fair enough. I don't agree that state control of power industries is a sensible way of planning for future energy needs. Are there any of the Communist Party of Britain's policies that you disagree with?
Alert a moderator to this post

carlonoil

Naples 20 Oct 16 3.22pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

You don't agree with planning for future energy needs. But bizarre but your prerogative. You don't agree with the majority of those polled about renationalisaton of essential services. Fair enough.

I don't agree that state control of power industries is a sensible way of planning for future energy needs.

Are there any of the Communist Party of Britain's policies that you disagree with?

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 20 Oct 16 4.01pm
Originally posted by carlonoil I don't agree that state control of power industries is a sensible way of planning for future energy needs. Are there any of the Communist Party of Britain's policies that you disagree with? We'll have to disagree on putting public services into public ownership. I broadly agree with what's in the manifesto. it's in line with what many those of a left outlook think. Doesn't make them (or me) all communists though. As I've said, Labour is a member led democratic socialist party, it is not 'run by communists' as you are alluding to. It feels like we are going back to the 70's. Next you'll be saying all labour supporters love Putin! Rather than just pointing and shouting lefty/ communist etc, why don't you put some arguments to back you up. Why don't you believe a state run company won't be able to see us forward? State run companies are doing well around the world, we've even got French state companies running part of our infrastructure(it's funny how many of those that are anti eu and europe don't moan about that). At least it'll be british profits for British companies. Edited by nickgusset (20 Oct 2016 4.07pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 20 Oct 16 4.01pm

Originally posted by carlonoil

I don't agree that state control of power industries is a sensible way of planning for future energy needs.

Are there any of the Communist Party of Britain's policies that you disagree with?

We'll have to disagree on putting public services into public ownership.
I broadly agree with what's in the manifesto. it's in line with what many those of a left outlook think. Doesn't make them (or me) all communists though.

As I've said, Labour is a member led democratic socialist party, it is not 'run by communists' as you are alluding to.
It feels like we are going back to the 70's. Next you'll be saying all labour supporters love Putin!

Rather than just pointing and shouting lefty/ communist etc, why don't you put some arguments to back you up.
Why don't you believe a state run company won't be able to see us forward? State run companies are doing well around the world, we've even got French state companies running part of our infrastructure(it's funny how many of those that are anti eu and europe don't moan about that).

At least it'll be british profits for British companies.

Edited by nickgusset (20 Oct 2016 4.07pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 20 Oct 16 4.37pm
More Labour working class hatred: [Link] "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 20 Oct 16 4.37pm

More Labour working class hatred:

[Link]

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

carlonoil Naples 20 Oct 16 4.43pm
Originally posted by nickgusset We'll have to disagree on putting public services into public ownership. I broadly agree with what's in the manifesto. it's in line with what many those of a left outlook think. Doesn't make them (or me) all communists though. As I've said, Labour is a member led democratic socialist party, it is not 'run by communists' as you are alluding to. It feels like we are going back to the 70's. Next you'll be saying all labour supporters love Putin! Rather than just pointing and shouting lefty/ communist etc, why don't you put some arguments to back you up. Why don't you believe a state run company won't be able to see us forward? State run companies are doing well around the world, we've even got French state companies running part of our infrastructure(it's funny how many of those that are anti eu and europe don't moan about that). At least it'll be british profits for British companies. Edited by nickgusset (20 Oct 2016 4.07pm) Well it seems logical that if someone agrees with all the policies of the Communist Party of Britain, then they are probably a communist and it is not unreasonable to describe them as such. Edited by carlonoil (20 Oct 2016 4.44pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

carlonoil

Naples 20 Oct 16 4.43pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

At least it'll be british profits for British companies.

Edited by nickgusset (20 Oct 2016 4.07pm)

Well it seems logical that if someone agrees with all the policies of the Communist Party of Britain, then they are probably a communist and it is not unreasonable to describe them as such.

Edited by carlonoil (20 Oct 2016 4.44pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 20 Oct 16 4.49pm
Originally posted by carlonoil Well it seems logical that if someone agrees with all the policies of the Communist Party of Britain, then they are probably a communist and it is not unreasonable to describe them as such. Edited by carlonoil (20 Oct 2016 4.44pm) Oh dear it's a fair Cop guv. You've got me banged to rights and no mistake. I needed a laugh today. Thanks for providing it.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 20 Oct 16 4.49pm

Originally posted by carlonoil

Well it seems logical that if someone agrees with all the policies of the Communist Party of Britain, then they are probably a communist and it is not unreasonable to describe them as such.

Edited by carlonoil (20 Oct 2016 4.44pm)

Oh dear it's a fair Cop guv. You've got me banged to rights and no mistake.

I needed a laugh today. Thanks for providing it.

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 20 Oct 16 4.59pm
Originally posted by matt_himself More Labour working class hatred: [Link] From the article... And in Chakrabarti’s world, to be working class means lacking ‘vision and views’. It means you’re narrow-minded and ignorant. Really, that's just s**e, baseless opinion, using the sort of emotive language to make froth. The referendum... Unless the final settlement proves to be acceptable’, it read, ‘then the option of retaining EU membership should be retained’.* The option of staying should be retained if brexit looks like it's going to be s***. Sounds reasonable. Why didn't the article complain about those from other parties who have doubts about brexit? Face it Lily. The article is a badly written, failed hatchet job that confuses the reader into believing the opinion written is fact. Any Guido today? I like reading the comments. They remind me of you.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 20 Oct 16 4.59pm

Originally posted by matt_himself

More Labour working class hatred:

[Link]

From the article...

And in Chakrabarti’s world, to be working class means lacking ‘vision and views’. It means you’re narrow-minded and ignorant.
Really, that's just s***e, baseless opinion, using the sort of emotive language to make froth.

The referendum...

Unless the final settlement proves to be acceptable’, it read, ‘then the option of retaining EU membership should be retained’.

The option of staying should be retained if brexit looks like it's going to be s***. Sounds reasonable. Why didn't the article complain about those from other parties who have doubts about brexit?

Face it Lily. The article is a badly written, failed hatchet job that confuses the reader into believing the opinion written is fact.

Any Guido today? I like reading the comments. They remind me of you.

Alert a moderator to this post

Mr_Gristle In the land of Whelk Eaters 20 Oct 16 6.59pm
Originally posted by carlonoil I don't think they publicise their hidden agenda. I don't agree with any of their policies. I partly agree with their EU policy, but in addition to opposing a "monopoly capitalist United States of Europe", I would also oppose a communist United States of Europe, or any other type of United States of Europe for that matter. Thanks for responding in good faith. I too would oppose any sort of fully united Europe and I'm a liberatian socialist. Scary ? However, if you think a stated policy list hides a "hidden agenda" that's not publicised, surely the logical progression is that any and all political entities have their own hidden agendas......? Edited by Mr_Gristle (20 Oct 2016 7.00pm) Well I think Simon's head is large; always involved in espionage. (Name that tune)
Alert a moderator to this post

Mr_Gristle

In the land of Whelk Eaters 20 Oct 16 6.59pm

Originally posted by carlonoil

I don't think they publicise their hidden agenda.

Thanks for responding in good faith. I too would oppose any sort of fully united Europe and I'm a liberatian socialist. Scary ?

However, if you think a stated policy list hides a "hidden agenda" that's not publicised, surely the logical progression is that any and all political entities have their own hidden agendas......?

Edited by Mr_Gristle (20 Oct 2016 7.00pm)

Well I think Simon's head is large; always involved in espionage. (Name that tune)

Alert a moderator to this post

carlonoil Naples 20 Oct 16 9.53pm
Originally posted by Mr_Gristle Thanks for responding in good faith. I too would oppose any sort of fully united Europe and I'm a liberatian socialist. Scary ? However, if you think a stated policy list hides a "hidden agenda" that's not publicised, surely the logical progression is that any and all political entities have their own hidden agendas......? Edited by Mr_Gristle (20 Oct 2016 7.00pm) I certainly agree with that.
Alert a moderator to this post

carlonoil

Naples 20 Oct 16 9.53pm

Originally posted by Mr_Gristle

Thanks for responding in good faith. I too would oppose any sort of fully united Europe and I'm a liberatian socialist. Scary ?

However, if you think a stated policy list hides a "hidden agenda" that's not publicised, surely the logical progression is that any and all political entities have their own hidden agendas......?

Edited by Mr_Gristle (20 Oct 2016 7.00pm)

I certainly agree with that.

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 21 Oct 16 7.15am
Originally posted by carlonoil I certainly agree with that. Then why just pick on the Communist Party when mentioning it.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 21 Oct 16 7.15am

Originally posted by carlonoil

I certainly agree with that.

Then why just pick on the Communist Party when mentioning it.

Alert a moderator to this post

carlonoil Naples 21 Oct 16 7.42am
Originally posted by nickgusset Then why just pick on the Communist Party when mentioning it. Because Mr.Gristle and I were discussing the policies of the Communist Party of Britain.
Alert a moderator to this post

carlonoil

Naples 21 Oct 16 7.42am

Originally posted by nickgusset

Then why just pick on the Communist Party when mentioning it.

Because Mr.Gristle and I were discussing the policies of the Communist Party of Britain.

Alert a moderator to this post

Hoof Hearted 21 Oct 16 11.08am
Can't help thinking that someone has lent Gusset the "Assertiveness For Dummies" book. He's definitely trying to be more assertive..... not sure it's working though?
Alert a moderator to this post

Hoof Hearted 21 Oct 16 11.08am

Can't help thinking that someone has lent Gusset the "Assertiveness For Dummies" book.

He's definitely trying to be more assertive..... not sure it's working though?

Alert a moderator to this post

Topic Locked

Page 392 of 2586 < 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors