This, the fee plus loan fees we have got from him means we will probably turn a small profit from him. Amazing when you think of how he played in a palace shirt....thank you Trab!

The poster was making a joke..

at least we might get a small net net profit

Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

didn't way pay around 8-9m for him in the first place? So we haven't made much of a return on him (in terms of performances and profit). Some of those headlines make it sound like we made loads of money but in real terms is a small margin. Think we've been very kind to the Turks as well however we were at the mercy of a poor contract vs their great one.

is the correct response. Trabzonspor have made this possible and a 50/50 split seems fair to me. It's more than we were expecting when we shipped him off to Turkey.

Regardless of all those that think otherwise. No one could have felt Sorloth , had any chance of the success he had last year.
I still can not accept that a player the Turks have never payed for can be worth half of any transfer that happens midway through a loan.
But if that is how this has panned out, if we get our initial outlay plus a bit then that money can be reinvested. The Turks, make a substantial profit on having never payed for the player. In the way of a transfer fee.
Because of the length of the loan, and the option to buy a percentage could always have been right for the Turks, but fifty ,fifty seems we get short change to me.