This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Mapletree Croydon 12 Mar 19 2.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by becky
Oi! We don't all go senile the minute we turn 60 you know You retired at 60? If only Us of the younger generation (between 60 and 65) could only dream of such a thing The trouble is your incessant campaigning for cheaper cat food and lower insurance on Honda Jazzs. People who aren't yet working also aren't senile though. I think the point was more about the daily contribution to the wealth of the nation.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
becky over the moon 12 Mar 19 2.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
You retired at 60? If only Us of the younger generation (between 60 and 65) could only dream of such a thing The trouble is your incessant campaigning for cheaper cat food and lower insurance on Honda Jazzs. People who aren't yet working also aren't senile though. I think the point was more about the daily contribution to the wealth of the nation. Actually, I retired at 61 having started work at 15 and worked continuously between. Drive a Smart and can't stand cats - dog person,me. Those not yet working may not be senile, but neither have they gained a lifetimes worth of knowledge and experience of all department of life. I still make a daily contribution to the wealth of the nation through my taxes! So there! *sound of loud raspberry being blown*
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Stirlingsays 12 Mar 19 2.52pm | |
---|---|
Look....lets all just stop voting.....it only encourages them. Lets write out policies and put them alongside the lottery numbers and roll that once a year and just carry out what we get. No doubt it'll all go to s***e but will we notice a difference?.....and at least it'll make the gamblers happy. Edited by Stirlingsays (12 Mar 2019 2.53pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 12 Mar 19 2.53pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by becky
Actually, I retired at 61 having started work at 15 and worked continuously between. Drive a Smart and can't stand cats - dog person,me. Those not yet working may not be senile, but neither have they gained a lifetimes worth of knowledge and experience of all department of life. I still make a daily contribution to the wealth of the nation through my taxes! So there! *sound of loud raspberry being blown* Well, on the basis the idea was you can't vote until you have paid off your student loan, I am not fully convinced on your third sentence.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 12 Mar 19 2.55pm | |
---|---|
Becky gets an automatic pass.....being a Palace supporter. In fact, the Palace voters all get a free car......just like on that US chat show. Edited by Stirlingsays (12 Mar 2019 2.57pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jimenez SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 13 Apr 19 10.25pm | |
---|---|
Pro USA & Israel |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 13 Apr 19 10.30pm | |
---|---|
It really shows you how cucked this nation is that we get involved in arguments about whether we welcome back the married brides of those swore to murder westerners.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 14 Apr 19 7.44am | |
---|---|
I'm not surprised I didn't buy into the narrative that having arrived in ISIS territory all she did was play housewife to her husband. ISIS use everybody that's part of the deal rather like Sadam Hussain made all his key people murder his opponents so they all had blood on their hands. Of course this goes against the narrative that the PR person has been pushing with the papers on behalf of her family. I expect that we will see a tearful confession over the next few days that she was forced to do this even though she didn't want to. Director: "Alright Shamima love once more and let's really see those tears this time darling." Edited by Badger11 (14 Apr 2019 7.44am)
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 16 Apr 19 9.01am | |
---|---|
So no surprise that this woman has got legal aid and Jezza is supporting her. Meanwhile on LBC the father of one of the six redcaps murdered in Iraq phoned in to complain that he and the other families have been fighting for justice for their sons and have been denied legal aid so they fight on alone. Same old same old the good are denied but there's plenty of money for the scum.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 16 Apr 19 5.37pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
So no surprise that this woman has got legal aid and Jezza is supporting her. Meanwhile on LBC the father of one of the six redcaps murdered in Iraq phoned in to complain that he and the other families have been fighting for justice for their sons and have been denied legal aid so they fight on alone. Same old same old the good are denied but there's plenty of money for the scum. I appreciate that I am out of step with many of my fellow Travellers on the right over this, and it is a disgrace about the lack of legal aid for the parents of those poor military police men, but how we deal with our 'scum', is what defines us as a civilisation. This girl was 15 when she ran away. A child by our legal definition. If she was a day over 18, then I would be screaming and hollering with the rest of you without a single hesitation. But she was not. Now her age does not excuse her actions in the slightest. But it should define how we, as a nation, view her. She should be allowed back into British legal jurisdiction (perhaps a military base until such time she is deemed no longer a threat). Then returned to the UK and given a second chance, no matter how much it sticks in our collective gullets. Otherwise it makes us no better than the jihadi filth she ran away to join up with. We have to hold ourselves to higher standards than those we opposed. And effectively punishing children for mistakes they made when they were 15 is one of them, no matter how loathesome the circumstances are. Because otherwise what is the point? What is the point of trying to resist all that is going on if we cannot bring ourselves to offer a life-line to people who f***ed up before they were old enough to buy a drink in a pub? Or vote?
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 16 Apr 19 6.27pm | |
---|---|
In most circumstances I agree with this, however, when people stick their fingers up to the country and make it their enemy, only to want to return when their battle and army they joined with the aim to destroy us then I cannot bring myself to show the world how civilised we are by also making ourselves like complete suckers and fools these types see us as, and have and will take advantage at any opportunity given half the chance. A worse message is to say it’s alright and okay, we’re always here to forgive and forget. I’m more concerned about us being a national pushover and laughed at in private by people taking the p1ss than worrying about how a fewxmight think we’re uncivilised for a few moments in time before there’s new headlines.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 16 Apr 19 6.29pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
I appreciate that I am out of step with many of my fellow Travellers on the right over this, and it is a disgrace about the lack of legal aid for the parents of those poor military police men, but how we deal with our 'scum', is what defines us as a civilisation. This girl was 15 when she ran away. A child by our legal definition. If she was a day over 18, then I would be screaming and hollering with the rest of you without a single hesitation. But she was not. Now her age does not excuse her actions in the slightest. But it should define how we, as a nation, view her. She should be allowed back into British legal jurisdiction (perhaps a military base until such time she is deemed no longer a threat). Then returned to the UK and given a second chance, no matter how much it sticks in our collective gullets. Otherwise it makes us no better than the jihadi filth she ran away to join up with. We have to hold ourselves to higher standards than those we opposed. And effectively punishing children for mistakes they made when they were 15 is one of them, no matter how loathesome the circumstances are. Because otherwise what is the point? What is the point of trying to resist all that is going on if we cannot bring ourselves to offer a life-line to people who f***ed up before they were old enough to buy a drink in a pub? Or vote? Really considered post M.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.