You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Bias against Trump
November 27 2024 1.50am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Bias against Trump

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 383 of 573 < 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 >

  

Invalid user 2019 Flag 24 Nov 19 12.25pm

Originally posted by Badger11

Ruth Bader Ginsburg back in Hospital

[Link]

Every time this woman sneezes the Democrats panic. She is the darling of the left for her legal judgements but she may ruin her legacy by not standing down from the Supreme Court.

Apparently when Obama was President it was suggested to her that as she had a history of ill heath now would be a good time to retire so he could appoint a younger like minded judge. She cannot be sacked and so far has stubbornly refused to go.

The Democrats greatest fear is that something will happen to her whilst Trump is President, he has already appointed 2 Supreme Court judges which is quite a lot for a 1 term president.

If he gets a 3rd she may go from hero to zero with her followers.

Edited by Badger11 (24 Nov 2019 7.50am)

She's testament to how long you can keep ticking over if you have the very best healthcare available. She's had more cancers than a star sign convention.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 24 Nov 19 1.49pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Jimenez

He's finished, he's toast....

Maybe Corn Pop will emerge to save him....or join the race.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 24 Nov 19 1.53pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

Ruth Bader Ginsburg back in Hospital

[Link]

Every time this woman sneezes the Democrats panic. She is the darling of the left for her legal judgements but she may ruin her legacy by not standing down from the Supreme Court.

Apparently when Obama was President it was suggested to her that as she had a history of ill heath now would be a good time to retire so he could appoint a younger like minded judge. She cannot be sacked and so far has stubbornly refused to go.

The Democrats greatest fear is that something will happen to her whilst Trump is President, he has already appointed 2 Supreme Court judges which is quite a lot for a 1 term president.

If he gets a 3rd she may go from hero to zero with her followers.

Edited by Badger11 (24 Nov 2019 7.50am)

I won't wish for her passing.

What I will say though is that if she does go while Trump gets to make the decision it could be the end of affirmative action and maybe even a change to Roe v Wade.

The court would be 6-3 in favour of conservatives.

Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Nov 2019 1.54pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Deleted11 24 Nov 19 3.48pm

Originally posted by Badger11

Ruth Bader Ginsburg back in Hospital

[Link]

Every time this woman sneezes the Democrats panic. She is the darling of the left for her legal judgements but she may ruin her legacy by not standing down from the Supreme Court.

Apparently when Obama was President it was suggested to her that as she had a history of ill heath now would be a good time to retire so he could appoint a younger like minded judge. She cannot be sacked and so far has stubbornly refused to go.

The Democrats greatest fear is that something will happen to her whilst Trump is President, he has already appointed 2 Supreme Court judges which is quite a lot for a 1 term president.

If he gets a 3rd she may go from hero to zero with her followers.

Edited by Badger11 (24 Nov 2019 7.50am)

Yes, she's still going, hoping a democrat gets in before the eventuality. It's quite hilarious and disturbing that so much focus is put on abortion rights with regards to SC nominations. Almost like they can't really get anything else done so just focus on non relevant stuff.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 24 Nov 19 4.46pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Jway89

Yes, she's still going, hoping a democrat gets in before the eventuality. It's quite hilarious and disturbing that so much focus is put on abortion rights with regards to SC nominations. Almost like they can't really get anything else done so just focus on non relevant stuff.

Non relevant?

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Deleted11 24 Nov 19 5.47pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Non relevant?

Imo.Women should be able to do what they want, so for me it's a non issue.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Invalid user 2019 Flag 24 Nov 19 9.35pm

Originally posted by Jway89

Imo.Women should be able to do what they want, so for me it's a non issue.

I agree that a lopsided Supreme Court might not be the best, as is the case with a lopsided anything really. On this issue though, while it's important that abortion remains an option, exactly when it takes place has to factor in. As in, in a fundamental sense another life is involved and to pass that off as a kind of neutral choice that has no impact on others doesn't really do the situation justice.

Everything taken into account, I'd be inclined to leave Roe vs Wade as is (as a minimum 12 week legal right), rather than lurch this way or that with it, on account that any change brings its own problems and will lead to a reaction in the opposite direction.


Edited by dollardays (24 Nov 2019 9.37pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 25 Nov 19 1.40am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Jway89

Imo.Women should be able to do what they want, so for me it's a non issue.

Well, we disagree on that one.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 25 Nov 19 3.26am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

The US is slowly spiraling to civil discord.

The behaviour of the Democrats since Trump was elected has been to reject his presidency. This stance has consequences down the line that will also be visited upon them. The left and right almost seem to be speaking different languages now.

This didn't start with Trump. I first noticed it with Bush Jnr....but to be fair his second term ended with him being disliked by both parties.

Obama's tenure saw the real opposition and rejection with the tea party. They hated Obama rather than opposed him. That type of opposition....call it activist has grown stronger and stronger.

I didn't think the Democrats would become that party but all it took was Trump and they made the tea party look like amateurs. They took Trump's tactic of making things personal and ran with it themselves.

Whoever wins in 2020 any talk about 'healing' or 'bringing people together' has zero chance of actually working.

The anger on both sides is tangible.

Edited by Stirlingsays (25 Nov 2019 3.28am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Deleted11 25 Nov 19 12.23pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays


Well, we disagree on that one.

Ok. disagree completely or are you more in the Badger camp of having a limit?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Deleted11 25 Nov 19 12.27pm

Sorry, not Badger. Dollardays

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 25 Nov 19 12.30pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Jway89

Ok. disagree completely or are you more in the Badger camp of having a limit?

It's an horrendous topic for me to think about....but it's an important one.

A baby has a heartbeat at around six weeks.....I find it hard to justify after that.

There are plenty of considerations....rape, deformity, unwanted pregnancies and unsuitable parents....so on and so forth. I accept that in certain situations it's complicated.

However, when I hear the topic slanted so one way I feel I need to speak up for the life of the unborn child....who is frequently ignored like it's some purely 'feminist' issue. The unborn child isn't biological waste and our system and laws often seem to treat them like that....We were all that unborn child once.

I definitely don't see this issue the same way after we had our boys.....I never really had to think about it before but once I saw that scan, the world changed.

Edited by Stirlingsays (25 Nov 2019 12.33pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 383 of 573 < 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Bias against Trump