This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Hrolf The Ganger 31 Jul 15 7.35pm | |
---|---|
Thers seems to be a number of debates around this issue but in predictable form they seem often to be divided down political lines. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (31 Jul 2015 7.37pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
-TUX- Alphabettispaghetti 31 Jul 15 8.00pm | |
---|---|
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 31 Jul 2015 7.35pm
Thers seems to be a number of debates around this issue but in predictable form they seem often to be divided down political lines. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (31 Jul 2015 7.37pm)
Edited by -TUX- (31 Jul 2015 8.01pm) Edited by -TUX- (31 Jul 2015 8.04pm)
Time to move forward together. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 31 Jul 15 8.43pm | |
---|---|
I am not saying there are not issues to be dealt with as well as humanitarian crises.But,to knock two myths on the head: 1,The myth that they are all coming here because of benefits.Welfare benefits are overall better in France and Germany than here.If people are coming because we have the best benefits,how come in 2014,there were over 200,000 thousand applications for asylum in Germany and over 60,000 in France.We had not much over 30,000. 2. The "hoards" are at the door compared to other "rich" European countries with the UK being near singled out as shouldering a major "burden".See 1 above.Also,being an island,by definition entry here is much harder.So people congregate in certain spots like Calais (5,000 in all) .Because our borders (except with Republic of Ireland) are all sea ones and we are located in N Europe),our borders are very much more "secure" than most European countries to illegal entrants.In other countries far greater numbers cross the border illegally/try to because they have long land borders.Its just there's no need for all those trying to congregate in one main spot. Germany estimated 57,0000 illegal entrants in 2014. It seems the present "crisis" may be very much exacerbated because French employees/former employees of the company that owns the tunnel and which recently closed a ferry service so workers losing their jobs,have been carrying out actions deliberately to cause long queues at the tunnel etc,so creating the conditions for desperate people to try to get on slow moving/static trains/lorries.The causal effect of what is now seen as a migrant created crisis causing meetings of the Government's COBRA committee to be held for PR reasons not being necessarily the migrants. There is clearly a major issue about large numbers of people from outside Europe seeking to come to "rich" European countries and how best to deal with that.Some fleeing horrendous humanitarian crises in their own counties/wars and some pure economic migrants.But the idea (whipped up with a fury by the popular press) that the hoards are focused solely on the UK (and mainly because of benefits)is IMO pure tosh . On the radio this week,I heard a Kent County Council spokesperson speak about having had to find accommodation for about 120 people who had "arrived" from over the Channel,resulting (understandably) in pressures when budgets are being slashed.Compare that to Greece (where budgets have been slashed somewhat more)having to cater for many many thousands. For some reason,the popular press seem to focus very intensely on the "myths". Edited by legaleagle (31 Jul 2015 8.54pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tom-the-eagle Croydon 31 Jul 15 8.45pm | |
---|---|
I don't think it helps that most of the Calais migrants are male, black, smelly and unwashed and wearing stinky old clothes. I for one would genuinely feel more agreeable to their plight if they were mainly young, blond Swedish females wearing boots and shorts skirts. In fact I would even be perfectly happy to smuggle three or four across the border in the boot of my car and help with their housing and other ongoing needs.
"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
leggedstruggle Croydon 31 Jul 15 8.51pm | |
---|---|
Quote legaleagle at 31 Jul 2015 8.43pm
I am not saying there are not issues to be dealt with as well as humanitarian crises.But,to knock two myths on the head: 1,The myth that they are all coming here because of benefits.Welfare benefits are overall better in France and Germany than here.If people are coming because we have the best benefits,how come in 2014,there were over 200,000 thousand applications for asylum in Germany and over 60,000 in France.We had not much over 30,000. 2. The "hoards" are at the door compared to other "rich" European countries with the UK being near singled out as shouldering a major "burden".See 1 above.Also,being an island,by definition entry here is much harder.So people congregate in certain spots liked Calais (5,000 in all) .In other countries far greater numbers cross the border illegally/try to because they have long land borders.Its just there's no need for all those trying to congregate in one main spot. Germany estimated 57,0000 illegal entrants in 2014. It seems the present "crisis" may be very much exacerbated because French employees/former employees of the company that owns the tunnel and which recently closed a ferry service so workers losing their jobs,have been carrying out actions deliberately to cause long queues at the tunnel etc,so creating the conditions for desperate people to try to get on slow moving/static trains/lorries.The causal effect of what is now seen as a migrant created crisis causing meetings of the Government's COBRA committee to be held for PR reasons not being necessarily the migrants. There is clearly a major issue about large numbers of people from outside Europe seeking to come to "rich" European countries and how best to deal with that.Some fleeing horrendous humanitarian crises in their own counties/wars and some pure economic migrants.But the idea (whipped up with a fury by the popular press) that the hoards are focused solely on the UK (and mainly because of benefits)is IMO pure tosh . For some reason,the popular press seem to focus very intensely on the "myths". Edited by legaleagle (31 Jul 2015 8.44pm) How many are you going to put up at Legaleagle Towers? Usual left wing drivel playing down any crisis for politically correct reasons - same with Islamic terrorism, Muslim child abuse gangs, black gun, knife and drug crimes etc. But of course isolated incidents of racism and homophobia are the end of the world. By the way, what is the substance, as you see it, of the 'major issue about large numbers of people from outside Europe seeking to come to "rich" European countries'? Edited by leggedstruggle (31 Jul 2015 9.02pm)
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
fed up eagle Between Horley, Surrey and Preston... 31 Jul 15 8.51pm | |
---|---|
Quote Tom-the-eagle at 31 Jul 2015 8.45pm
I don't think it helps that most of the Calais migrants are male, black, smelly and unwashed and wearing stinky old clothes. I for one would genuinely feel more agreeable to their plight if they were mainly young, blond Swedish females wearing boots and shorts skirts. In fact I would even be perfectly happy to smuggle three or four across the border in the boot of my car and help with their housing and other ongoing needs.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 31 Jul 15 9.09pm | |
---|---|
Quote leggedstruggle at 31 Jul 2015 8.51pm
Quote legaleagle at 31 Jul 2015 8.43pm
I am not saying there are not issues to be dealt with as well as humanitarian crises.But,to knock two myths on the head: 1,The myth that they are all coming here because of benefits.Welfare benefits are overall better in France and Germany than here.If people are coming because we have the best benefits,how come in 2014,there were over 200,000 thousand applications for asylum in Germany and over 60,000 in France.We had not much over 30,000. 2. The "hoards" are at the door compared to other "rich" European countries with the UK being near singled out as shouldering a major "burden".See 1 above.Also,being an island,by definition entry here is much harder.So people congregate in certain spots liked Calais (5,000 in all) .In other countries far greater numbers cross the border illegally/try to because they have long land borders.Its just there's no need for all those trying to congregate in one main spot. Germany estimated 57,0000 illegal entrants in 2014. It seems the present "crisis" may be very much exacerbated because French employees/former employees of the company that owns the tunnel and which recently closed a ferry service so workers losing their jobs,have been carrying out actions deliberately to cause long queues at the tunnel etc,so creating the conditions for desperate people to try to get on slow moving/static trains/lorries.The causal effect of what is now seen as a migrant created crisis causing meetings of the Government's COBRA committee to be held for PR reasons not being necessarily the migrants. There is clearly a major issue about large numbers of people from outside Europe seeking to come to "rich" European countries and how best to deal with that.Some fleeing horrendous humanitarian crises in their own counties/wars and some pure economic migrants.But the idea (whipped up with a fury by the popular press) that the hoards are focused solely on the UK (and mainly because of benefits)is IMO pure tosh . For some reason,the popular press seem to focus very intensely on the "myths". Edited by legaleagle (31 Jul 2015 8.44pm) How many are you going to put up at Legaleagle Towers? Usual left wing drivel playing down any crisis for politically correct reasons - same with Islamic terrorism, Muslim child abuse gangs, black gun, knife and drug crimes etc. But of course isolated incidents of racism and homophobia are the end of the world. By the way, what is the substance as you see it of the 'major issue about large numbers of people from outside Europe seeking to come to "rich" European countries'?
First para repeat of yesterday's post by you.Re-read my answer.I have put up people in the past with nowhere to go, having fled war and persecution abroad.Bet you haven't,unless they have been fleeing living near anyone of a different race,religion or ethnicity to you. Rest of your post illustrates your simply quite breathtaking ignorances and prejudices and failure to offer anything remotely meaningful to the debate in question far better than I could have.You remind me of a poster called Derben. Didn't he get red-carded? I'm a grandchild of four refugees/economic migrants.You come across (metaphorically) as if you were a grandchild of four people who lived in a cave with a world view limited to the cave and who have successfully passed on their outlook to you unchanged from cavemen days. Can we offer you passage through the Channel tunnel in the other direction in a one for one exchange?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
-TUX- Alphabettispaghetti 31 Jul 15 9.09pm | |
---|---|
Quote leggedstruggle at 31 Jul 2015 8.51pm
Quote legaleagle at 31 Jul 2015 8.43pm
I am not saying there are not issues to be dealt with as well as humanitarian crises.But,to knock two myths on the head: 1,The myth that they are all coming here because of benefits.Welfare benefits are overall better in France and Germany than here.If people are coming because we have the best benefits,how come in 2014,there were over 200,000 thousand applications for asylum in Germany and over 60,000 in France.We had not much over 30,000. 2. The "hoards" are at the door compared to other "rich" European countries with the UK being near singled out as shouldering a major "burden".See 1 above.Also,being an island,by definition entry here is much harder.So people congregate in certain spots liked Calais (5,000 in all) .In other countries far greater numbers cross the border illegally/try to because they have long land borders.Its just there's no need for all those trying to congregate in one main spot. Germany estimated 57,0000 illegal entrants in 2014. It seems the present "crisis" may be very much exacerbated because French employees/former employees of the company that owns the tunnel and which recently closed a ferry service so workers losing their jobs,have been carrying out actions deliberately to cause long queues at the tunnel etc,so creating the conditions for desperate people to try to get on slow moving/static trains/lorries.The causal effect of what is now seen as a migrant created crisis causing meetings of the Government's COBRA committee to be held for PR reasons not being necessarily the migrants. There is clearly a major issue about large numbers of people from outside Europe seeking to come to "rich" European countries and how best to deal with that.Some fleeing horrendous humanitarian crises in their own counties/wars and some pure economic migrants.But the idea (whipped up with a fury by the popular press) that the hoards are focused solely on the UK (and mainly because of benefits)is IMO pure tosh . For some reason,the popular press seem to focus very intensely on the "myths". Edited by legaleagle (31 Jul 2015 8.44pm) How many are you going to put up at Legaleagle Towers? Usual left wing drivel playing down any crisis for politically correct reasons - same with Islamic terrorism, Muslim child abuse gangs, black gun, knife and drug crimes etc. But of course isolated incidents of racism and homophobia are the end of the world. By the way, what is the substance, as you see it, of the 'major issue about large numbers of people from outside Europe seeking to come to "rich" European countries'? Todays news is full of right wing ''drivel'' and nothing will change. Just an observation. Edited by leggedstruggle (31 Jul 2015 9.02pm)
Time to move forward together. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
-TUX- Alphabettispaghetti 31 Jul 15 9.22pm | |
---|---|
Quote legaleagle at 31 Jul 2015 9.09pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 31 Jul 2015 8.51pm
Quote legaleagle at 31 Jul 2015 8.43pm
I am not saying there are not issues to be dealt with as well as humanitarian crises.But,to knock two myths on the head: 1,The myth that they are all coming here because of benefits.Welfare benefits are overall better in France and Germany than here.If people are coming because we have the best benefits,how come in 2014,there were over 200,000 thousand applications for asylum in Germany and over 60,000 in France.We had not much over 30,000. 2. The "hoards" are at the door compared to other "rich" European countries with the UK being near singled out as shouldering a major "burden".See 1 above.Also,being an island,by definition entry here is much harder.So people congregate in certain spots liked Calais (5,000 in all) .In other countries far greater numbers cross the border illegally/try to because they have long land borders.Its just there's no need for all those trying to congregate in one main spot. Germany estimated 57,0000 illegal entrants in 2014. It seems the present "crisis" may be very much exacerbated because French employees/former employees of the company that owns the tunnel and which recently closed a ferry service so workers losing their jobs,have been carrying out actions deliberately to cause long queues at the tunnel etc,so creating the conditions for desperate people to try to get on slow moving/static trains/lorries.The causal effect of what is now seen as a migrant created crisis causing meetings of the Government's COBRA committee to be held for PR reasons not being necessarily the migrants. There is clearly a major issue about large numbers of people from outside Europe seeking to come to "rich" European countries and how best to deal with that.Some fleeing horrendous humanitarian crises in their own counties/wars and some pure economic migrants.But the idea (whipped up with a fury by the popular press) that the hoards are focused solely on the UK (and mainly because of benefits)is IMO pure tosh . For some reason,the popular press seem to focus very intensely on the "myths". Edited by legaleagle (31 Jul 2015 8.44pm) How many are you going to put up at Legaleagle Towers? Usual left wing drivel playing down any crisis for politically correct reasons - same with Islamic terrorism, Muslim child abuse gangs, black gun, knife and drug crimes etc. But of course isolated incidents of racism and homophobia are the end of the world. By the way, what is the substance as you see it of the 'major issue about large numbers of people from outside Europe seeking to come to "rich" European countries'?
First para repeat of yesterday's post by you.Re-read my answer.I have put up people in the past with nowhere to go, having fled war and persecution abroad.Bet you haven't,unless they have been fleeing living near anyone of a different race,religion or ethnicity to you. Rest of your post illustrates your simply quite breathtaking ignorances and prejudices and failure to offer anything remotely meaningful to the debate in question far better than I could have.You remind me of a poster called Derben. Didn't he get red-carded? I'm a grandchild of four refugees/economic migrants.You come across (metaphorically) as if you were a grandchild of four people who lived in a cave with a world view limited to the cave and who have successfully passed on their outlook to you unchanged from cavemen days. Can we offer you passage through the Channel tunnel in the other direction in a one for one exchange?
Time to move forward together. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
leggedstruggle Croydon 31 Jul 15 9.39pm | |
---|---|
Quote legaleagle at 31 Jul 2015 9.09pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 31 Jul 2015 8.51pm
Quote legaleagle at 31 Jul 2015 8.43pm
I am not saying there are not issues to be dealt with as well as humanitarian crises.But,to knock two myths on the head: 1,The myth that they are all coming here because of benefits.Welfare benefits are overall better in France and Germany than here.If people are coming because we have the best benefits,how come in 2014,there were over 200,000 thousand applications for asylum in Germany and over 60,000 in France.We had not much over 30,000. 2. The "hoards" are at the door compared to other "rich" European countries with the UK being near singled out as shouldering a major "burden".See 1 above.Also,being an island,by definition entry here is much harder.So people congregate in certain spots liked Calais (5,000 in all) .In other countries far greater numbers cross the border illegally/try to because they have long land borders.Its just there's no need for all those trying to congregate in one main spot. Germany estimated 57,0000 illegal entrants in 2014. It seems the present "crisis" may be very much exacerbated because French employees/former employees of the company that owns the tunnel and which recently closed a ferry service so workers losing their jobs,have been carrying out actions deliberately to cause long queues at the tunnel etc,so creating the conditions for desperate people to try to get on slow moving/static trains/lorries.The causal effect of what is now seen as a migrant created crisis causing meetings of the Government's COBRA committee to be held for PR reasons not being necessarily the migrants. There is clearly a major issue about large numbers of people from outside Europe seeking to come to "rich" European countries and how best to deal with that.Some fleeing horrendous humanitarian crises in their own counties/wars and some pure economic migrants.But the idea (whipped up with a fury by the popular press) that the hoards are focused solely on the UK (and mainly because of benefits)is IMO pure tosh . For some reason,the popular press seem to focus very intensely on the "myths". Edited by legaleagle (31 Jul 2015 8.44pm) How many are you going to put up at Legaleagle Towers? Usual left wing drivel playing down any crisis for politically correct reasons - same with Islamic terrorism, Muslim child abuse gangs, black gun, knife and drug crimes etc. But of course isolated incidents of racism and homophobia are the end of the world. By the way, what is the substance as you see it of the 'major issue about large numbers of people from outside Europe seeking to come to "rich" European countries'?
First para repeat of yesterday's post by you.Re-read my answer.I have put up people in the past with nowhere to go, having fled war and persecution abroad.Bet you haven't,unless they have been fleeing living near anyone of a different race,religion or ethnicity to you. Rest of your post illustrates your simply quite breathtaking ignorances and prejudices and failure to offer anything remotely meaningful to the debate in question far better than I could have.You remind me of a poster called Derben. Didn't he get red-carded? I'm a grandchild of four refugees/economic migrants.You come across (metaphorically) as if you were a grandchild of four people who lived in a cave with a world view limited to the cave and who have successfully passed on their outlook to you unchanged from cavemen days. Can we offer you passage through the Channel tunnel in the other direction in a one for one exchange?
What relevance does the origins of your grandparents have? Your post illustrates well the second strand of New Left tactics - as well as playing down significant problems for politically correct reasons, you then resort to patronising abuse of people who express views you do not agree with. I note, of course, that you have not described the nature of the 'major issue about large numbers of people from outside Europe seeking to come to "rich" European countries'?
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
-TUX- Alphabettispaghetti 31 Jul 15 9.56pm | |
---|---|
Quote leggedstruggle at 31 Jul 2015 9.39pm
Quote legaleagle at 31 Jul 2015 9.09pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 31 Jul 2015 8.51pm
Quote legaleagle at 31 Jul 2015 8.43pm
I am not saying there are not issues to be dealt with as well as humanitarian crises.But,to knock two myths on the head: 1,The myth that they are all coming here because of benefits.Welfare benefits are overall better in France and Germany than here.If people are coming because we have the best benefits,how come in 2014,there were over 200,000 thousand applications for asylum in Germany and over 60,000 in France.We had not much over 30,000. 2. The "hoards" are at the door compared to other "rich" European countries with the UK being near singled out as shouldering a major "burden".See 1 above.Also,being an island,by definition entry here is much harder.So people congregate in certain spots liked Calais (5,000 in all) .In other countries far greater numbers cross the border illegally/try to because they have long land borders.Its just there's no need for all those trying to congregate in one main spot. Germany estimated 57,0000 illegal entrants in 2014. It seems the present "crisis" may be very much exacerbated because French employees/former employees of the company that owns the tunnel and which recently closed a ferry service so workers losing their jobs,have been carrying out actions deliberately to cause long queues at the tunnel etc,so creating the conditions for desperate people to try to get on slow moving/static trains/lorries.The causal effect of what is now seen as a migrant created crisis causing meetings of the Government's COBRA committee to be held for PR reasons not being necessarily the migrants. There is clearly a major issue about large numbers of people from outside Europe seeking to come to "rich" European countries and how best to deal with that.Some fleeing horrendous humanitarian crises in their own counties/wars and some pure economic migrants.But the idea (whipped up with a fury by the popular press) that the hoards are focused solely on the UK (and mainly because of benefits)is IMO pure tosh . For some reason,the popular press seem to focus very intensely on the "myths". Edited by legaleagle (31 Jul 2015 8.44pm) How many are you going to put up at Legaleagle Towers? Usual left wing drivel playing down any crisis for politically correct reasons - same with Islamic terrorism, Muslim child abuse gangs, black gun, knife and drug crimes etc. But of course isolated incidents of racism and homophobia are the end of the world. By the way, what is the substance as you see it of the 'major issue about large numbers of people from outside Europe seeking to come to "rich" European countries'?
First para repeat of yesterday's post by you.Re-read my answer.I have put up people in the past with nowhere to go, having fled war and persecution abroad.Bet you haven't,unless they have been fleeing living near anyone of a different race,religion or ethnicity to you. Rest of your post illustrates your simply quite breathtaking ignorances and prejudices and failure to offer anything remotely meaningful to the debate in question far better than I could have.You remind me of a poster called Derben. Didn't he get red-carded? I'm a grandchild of four refugees/economic migrants.You come across (metaphorically) as if you were a grandchild of four people who lived in a cave with a world view limited to the cave and who have successfully passed on their outlook to you unchanged from cavemen days. Can we offer you passage through the Channel tunnel in the other direction in a one for one exchange?
What relevance does the origins of your grandparents have? Your post illustrates well the second strand of New Left tactics - as well as playing down significant problems for politically correct reasons, you then resort to patronising abuse of people who express views you do not agree with. I note, of course, that you have not described the nature of the 'major issue about large numbers of people from outside Europe seeking to come to "rich" European countries'?
Time to move forward together. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 31 Jul 15 10.15pm | |
---|---|
Quote leggedstruggle at 31 Jul 2015 9.39pm
What relevance does the origins of your grandparents have? Your post illustrates well the second strand of New Left tactics - as well as playing down significant problems for politically correct reasons, you then resort to patronising abuse of people who express views you do not agree with. I note, of course, that you have not described the nature of the 'major issue about large numbers of people from outside Europe seeking to come to "rich" European countries'?
Constant blind prejudice and inane points from a poster of whatever political hue such as Derben; no thanks.I place you in that category.Just my opinion.You are entitled to yours.Will try to restrain myself from now on from engaging with your posts;many give me the creeps.Just my opinion. The origins of my own grand parents might be felt to some to have some relevance to knowledge about (1)sharing a home with refugees/economic migrants so knowing such people for what they are actually like as "human beings"and (2) the ignorance of those with such a high degree of inbuilt prejudice towards refugees/economic migrants per se (remember,for example, the recent generic reference by a poster to "cockroaches"?)and (3) the motives/reasons of so many such people for coming here and the very positive contribution they have made overall to the enrichment of our society and (4) dealing with your imputation that "right thinking people" wouldn't actually want anyone who was a refugee/economic migrant living in their home if they had a choice, or that "lefties/liberals" talk the talk but of course are as prejudiced deep down as "right thinking people" like yourself when it comes to sharing their own 4 walls with a refugee or an economic migrant. All not entirely irrelevant to some of your very own posts. As for major issues re people wishing to come to "rich" countries in Europe, surprised you seem on the face of it to have no idea so you ask me. Here's some IMO (not necessarily in order of importance,but just examples). 1. Humanitarian, political and economic ones;Utter breakdown of some societies,ie Libya,Afghanistan. Doesn't just happen "over there".Look at the death of Yugoslavia in the heart of Europe not too long ago,and where the consequences (including migration and asylum)linger to this day.Was there 2 weeks ago.Seeing people still dealing with having had their homes burnt down by their neighbours because of their ethnicity/religion and forced to flee at the point of a gun with no possessions to somewhere with near zero decent job prospects brings it home a bit more than reading the papers or watching TV 2.Humanitarian issues re people drowning at sea,taking to the high seas with young kids in rickety boats etc 3.Economic migrant issues as old as the hills but now in a newer context due to globalisation.Not so different in a lot of ways to people coming to the South from Scotland and the NE in the 1930's in large numbersd and from Ireland in the 19th century,though there were no "illegality" or "nation state" issues,which raises an additional "issue".We've had our own fair share of outward "economic migrants" over the decades and centuries to lands of perceived "better opportunity" 4.Profiteering of people smugglers 5.The balance between compassion,humanitarian assistance,international obligations and immigration controls. 6.The age old battle against scaremongering,propaganda and ingrained prejudices in seeking an informed and proportionate debate,which does not mean only views I agree with. 7.Issues about applying for asylum in first "safe" country entered 8.Issues about spreading any burden equitably throughout the EU. 8.Seeing the "issues" in a global context 9.Issues about whether there are also agendas being stoked here, for not the best of reasons,which may not be immediately obvious Edited by legaleagle (31 Jul 2015 11.01pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.