This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
BlueJay UK 16 May 20 7.51pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
Macaque monkey trial offers hope [Link] Early days but potentially promising Preliminary results from this vaccine in humans should be available sometime in June. Rhesus macaque monkeys share about 93% of the same DNA as humans, so they're a logical step prior to testing in humans. Edited by BlueJay (16 May 2020 11.34pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 16 May 20 7.57pm | |
---|---|
They've intentionally quoted an incomplete version of what he said he make their point though - "The chance of anyone watching this dying of coronavirus is actually low" - is of course entirely wrong "On an individual level, the chance of anyone watching this dying of coronavirus is actually low" - is of course correct
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 16 May 20 9.26pm | |
---|---|
If you really believe that us taking the precautions that we have is a "hysterical overreaction by psychopathic lockdown statists" then I really pity you! It isn't. It's a very wise buying of time during which we learn, assess and prepare. If blundering headlong into a dark space is your idea of the way to confront this crisis then, whilst Mr Trump might agree with you, I don't and nor, I suspect, do many others in the UK.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jimenez SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 16 May 20 9.51pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
If you really believe that us taking the precautions that we have is a "hysterical overreaction by psychopathic lockdown statists" then I really pity you! It isn't. It's a very wise buying of time during which we learn, assess and prepare. If blundering headlong into a dark space is your idea of the way to confront this crisis then, whilst Mr Trump might agree with you, I don't and nor, I suspect, do many others in the UK. Pull your head out of your ass. I didn't suggest that, so please do not lump me in with the Trumpsters.
Pro USA & Israel |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 16 May 20 10.25pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jimenez
Pull your head out of your ass. I didn't suggest that, so please do not lump me in with the Trumpsters. The fact that the overall percentage who will die is not going to be that high is largely down to the fact that we have contained the spread and managed the risk. If we had just let it run it's course I think the consequences would have been very different. I might be wrong, but the fact that we did what we did suggests that those taking the decisions decided that the risk was too high. So that the death rate has been managed, so far at least, is not an argument for suggesting the lockdown was a mistake. Which is what these people are suggesting. I am not as close to what has happened in NY as you but looked at from here it seems that the local politicians have done a responsible job whilst being given little help and encouragement from the President, who seems entirely consumed by making sure this crisis doesn't impact his reelection prospects and hang everything else. Everywhere has suffered from a lack of preparedness and the availability of PPE and ventilators. You can only do the best you can with what you have and mistakes will be made and lessons learned. By the wise anyway. You won't find anything from me attacking the government over the care home situation for exactly the same applies here. We can all look back in time to analyse and learn lessons. Right now is not the time for political point-scoring. It's a time for coordinated action.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 16 May 20 10.45pm | |
---|---|
An interesting article questioning the next moves.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jimenez SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 16 May 20 10.53pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
The fact that the overall percentage who will die is not going to be that high is largely down to the fact that we have contained the spread and managed the risk. If we had just let it run it's course I think the consequences would have been very different. I might be wrong, but the fact that we did what we did suggests that those taking the decisions decided that the risk was too high. So that the death rate has been managed, so far at least, is not an argument for suggesting the lockdown was a mistake. Which is what these people are suggesting. I am not as close to what has happened in NY as you but looked at from here it seems that the local politicians have done a responsible job whilst being given little help and encouragement from the President, who seems entirely consumed by making sure this crisis doesn't impact his reelection prospects and hang everything else. Everywhere has suffered from a lack of preparedness and the availability of PPE and ventilators. You can only do the best you can with what you have and mistakes will be made and lessons learned. By the wise anyway. You won't find anything from me attacking the government over the care home situation for exactly the same applies here. We can all look back in time to analyse and learn lessons. Right now is not the time for political point-scoring. It's a time for coordinated action. EXACTLY you are not close to know what's going on, but still managed to have a dig at Trump in virtually the same sentence.
Pro USA & Israel |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 16 May 20 10.54pm | |
---|---|
A good friend of mine is a counsellor at a grammar school and has a private practice at home. He also happens to look after his elderly Mother. He was telling me that he may have to give up both jobs, on account that he's likely to be unable to avoid covid-19 at work or due to people coming into the home, as this would endanger his Mother. There are likely countless people in positions like this and it speaks to the need to have a far more targetted approach to protecting the elderly without putting the entire world indefinitely on hold in the process. - Better processes for keeping covid-19 out of care homes - Frequent testing, not sending patients into homes from hospital until they test negative. - A message that expresses the peril that businesses face if they cannot restart in some capacity, but also encourages sensible measures to avoid large outbreaks - Measures to encourage elderly within the community to pair up and seek shelter together where possible so that they have social bubbles but are protected while better treatments are found or this works it's way through communities. I can understand why the government issued a catch-all Stay at Home at the time to get people to adhere to it, but going forward it's important to focus on the facts and probabilities in a way that reflects reality and takes the finger off the pause button.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 16 May 20 11.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
A good friend of mine is a counsellor at a grammar school and has a private practice at home. He also happens to look after his elderly Mother. He was telling me that he may have to give up both jobs, on account that he's likely to be unable to avoid covid-19 at work or due to people coming into the home, as this would endanger his Mother. There are likely countless people in positions like this and it speaks to the need to have a far more targetted approach to protecting the elderly without putting the entire world indefinitely on hold in the process. - Better processes for keeping covid-19 out of care homes - Frequent testing, not sending patients into homes from hospital until they test negative. - A message that expresses the peril that businesses face if they cannot restart in some capacity, but also encourages sensible measures to avoid large outbreaks - Measures to encourage elderly within the community to pair up and seek shelter together where possible so that they have social bubbles but are protected while better treatments are found or this works it's way through communities. I can understand why the government issued a catch-all Stay at Home at the time to get people to adhere to it, but going forward it's important to focus on the facts and probabilities in a way that reflects reality and takes the finger off the pause button.
People entering care homes from hospitals are automatically quarantined for 14 days.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 17 May 20 12.13am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jimenez
EXACTLY you are not close to know what's going on, but still managed to have a dig at Trump in virtually the same sentence. You show your bias in the comments on Sadiq Khan. De Blasio has come over rather well in the presentations I have seen. Passionate, caring and committed. That he gave estimates that subsequently proved incorrect is a common phenomenon of this crisis. He would have not made them up but acted on the best advice available to him. Hindsight being what it is can make the really foolish seem wise, and the very clever seem foolish. We haven't needed the Nightingale Hospitals. Yet! But we have them now, ready for a second wave and so the NHS can resume some of it's currently paused work. I guess your Javits centre falls into the same category. Yes, I dig at Trump because his performance during this crisis is a disgrace and it needs to be called out. Yes, he agreed to send the hospital ship, but made sure he was photographed as it left the dock so everyone would know. If he had refused to send it he would have been hung out to dry! Edited by Wisbech Eagle (17 May 2020 12.15am)
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 17 May 20 12.56am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
People entering care homes from hospitals are automatically quarantined for 14 days. There have been numerous cases of old people put back into care homes resulting in wider outbreaks. In some cases tests have subsequently come back positive after you've been sent back. In others they have been sent to homes without current outbreaks, subsequently causing one. I think I recall you saying you work in this environment. I'm certainly not making a personal criticism, instead saying that the measures put in place or suggested were not adequate. This is evident by fact that Covid-19 is present in 35% + of care homes. There's more covid-19 in these environments than almost anywhere, because realistically social distancing isn't present. Quarantining is worthwhile, but it clearly hasn't been particularly successful and asymptomatic staff likely bring it into the environment too. There is no getting away from the fact that old people in these environments are sitting ducks, and the perfect storm for getting wiped out. If anyone has an elderly relative in a home, they should be aware of the considerable dangers and do their best for their loved ones based on that. In cases when they're well enough not to be there and there's other options, I would not blame them for choosing them. I understand that in some homes in France they have a rota type system where staff remain in the building for an extended period of time. That would cut the risks. I can't see it happening here though, so increased testing is probably as good as it gets. Edited by BlueJay (17 May 2020 12.57am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 17 May 20 1.02am | |
---|---|
They started quarantining elderly going into care homes a few weeks ago so not since the beginning of this virus. That’s where your complaint is. No doubt there is still some repairs to the procedures to follow. Edited by Rudi Hedman (17 May 2020 1.02am)
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.