Their attitude towards minorities seems to be highly inconsistent.

They also seem confused.....they think that if you differ in maybe one or two opinions that this makes you a different political animal, well that's hyperbolic and inaccurate.

I probably agree with 90 percent of grass roots conservatism. In fact we would probably agree much more than their leadership which is probably only around about 60 percent.

Edited by Stirlingsays (27 Oct 2021 7.23am)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

and still you make comments alluding to your supposed superiority, your opinion is just that, your opinion...doesnt make you better than ayone else, except in your mind..

better than you, thats for sure, I dont make apologies for paedos and rapists!!

Edited by the silurian (27 Oct 2021 8.27am)

Edited by the silurian (27 Oct 2021 8.27am)

I thought you were taking a break.

When have I ever apologised for "paedos and rapists"! Other than your fevered imagination and that of other misrepresenters here.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

If you believe mainstream opinion in the UK is tending towards the far right, then I disagree. It is in the centre, and fluctuates between centre right and centre left.

Election results are not a barometer of this, as many short-term things can influence them.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

I try not to "hate" anyone. It's only attitudes and actions that I find unacceptable. Those that hold them, and do them, need either help or correction. Not hatred.

I am not the least biased to Yaxley-Lennon. I think what he does, and continues to do, appalling and totally counterproductive to his stated aims.

No-one decent wants to see children abused by anyone, and that includes me. We all want to see the perpetrators stopped and to face justice, so when we see a vigilante who claims he is helping but those, whose actual responsibility it is, say otherwise then questions are rightly raised. Questions whose answers to me suggest that Y-L has a totally different agenda to his stated one, which his bank balance tends to support. That is the reason I described the children as his "tools", because he isn't really interested in their welfare. He is interested in self-promotion, rallying his admirers and revving up his Islamophobia campaign.

Y-L is either very clever, which seems unlikely given his propensity to use his fists when provoked, or needs help. What he isn't, is correct. Right, he certainly is.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

So why do the electorate continually reject the type of politics that you promote.

Edited by georgenorman (27 Oct 2021 2.06pm)