This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 18 Oct 22 1.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
You might say that, but my recollection is that people chose the Tories under Boris over the disgrace that is the Labour Party in a two horse race with one runner trying to ignore a democratic referendum result. Funny how you have forgotten so quickly. The same Labour Party incidentally had a massive spend up before they left office, causing the country to need austerity measures to reduce the debt. Labour under Corbyn was unelectable. Pretty much any Tory PM would have beaten him. No-one tried to ignore a "democratic referendum result"! That people sincerely believe that to be true is a very sad reflection on how little some people understand our democracy. Something ruthlessly exploited by the Brexiteers. Referendums have no part to play in our democracy. None whatsoever. Everything depends on the will of Parliament, which is sovereign. Parliament has the duty to determine what is in our best interests and to use it's collective conscience to do so. They were not bound by the referendum. They were bound by the vote triggering Article 50. They only voted for Article 50 out of fear, and not because they truly believed it to be in our best interests. Collectively they were more in favour of staying in, than in coming out. Parliament failed the people. Brexit and the way it happened is evidence of our decline.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 18 Oct 22 1.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Labour under Corbyn was unelectable. Pretty much any Tory PM would have beaten him. No-one tried to ignore a "democratic referendum result"! That people sincerely believe that to be true is a very sad reflection on how little some people understand our democracy. Something ruthlessly exploited by the Brexiteers. Referendums have no part to play in our democracy. None whatsoever. Everything depends on the will of Parliament, which is sovereign. Parliament has the duty to determine what is in our best interests and to use it's collective conscience to do so. They were not bound by the referendum. They were bound by the vote triggering Article 50. They only voted for Article 50 out of fear, and not because they truly believed it to be in our best interests. Collectively they were more in favour of staying in, than in coming out. Parliament failed the people. Brexit and the way it happened is evidence of our decline. Semantic codswallop. The public were given a choice with the promise that the outcome was binding. All other interpretations are Remainer bunk.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 18 Oct 22 11.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Semantic codswallop. The public were given a choice with the promise that the outcome was binding. All other interpretations are Remainer bunk. The truth is not semantics. I know what Cameron said but the truth is that his promise meant nothing. No PM can make a promise on that, or anything else of that kind. PM's don't control Parliament. Parliament controls the PM and can throw them out. All Cameron could do was promise to try to get it through. He could have promised to resign if he didn't. Those things are in his control. Parliament is not. Nor can parties promise to honour a referendum result if returned. They can promise to attempt to do so, but if circumstances change and Parliament decides that it is no longer the right decision, then their will is sovereign. That's just the way it is. All the fuss back in 2019 over those honourable MPs doing their best to convince Parliament to do their duty was very badly misplaced, and based on a complete misunderstanding of our democracy.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 18 Oct 22 11.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
The truth is not semantics. I know what Cameron said but the truth is that his promise meant nothing. No PM can make a promise on that, or anything else of that kind. PM's don't control Parliament. Parliament controls the PM and can throw them out. All Cameron could do was promise to try to get it through. He could have promised to resign if he didn't. Those things are in his control. Parliament is not. Nor can parties promise to honour a referendum result if returned. They can promise to attempt to do so, but if circumstances change and Parliament decides that it is no longer the right decision, then their will is sovereign. That's just the way it is. All the fuss back in 2019 over those honourable MPs doing their best to convince Parliament to do their duty was very badly misplaced, and based on a complete misunderstanding of our democracy. If these MPs don't understand our democracy then why should we rely on them to make all decisions for us?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Henry of Peckham Eton Mess 20 Oct 22 5.25pm | |
---|---|
Does anyone know if the lettuce is standing in the next leadership contest?
Denial is not just a river in Egypt |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Henry of Peckham Eton Mess 20 Oct 22 5.29pm | |
---|---|
Mind you ... do we really want another vegetable for Prime Minister?
Denial is not just a river in Egypt |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 20 Oct 22 9.19pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
If these MPs don't understand our democracy then why should we rely on them to make all decisions for us? It wasn't the MPs who voted against Johnson and lost the whip, who didn't understand democracy. It was those, like the Mail, who criticised them for doing so, and effectively ended their careers. Even in these pages they have been described as traitors, when actually they were heroes. Being expected to vote against your conscience should never be acceptable to an MP. Nor should the whip be withdrawn for anyone who does.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 20 Oct 22 9.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
It wasn't the MPs who voted against Johnson and lost the whip, who didn't understand democracy. It was those, like the Mail, who criticised them for doing so, and effectively ended their careers. Even in these pages they have been described as traitors, when actually they were heroes. Being expected to vote against your conscience should never be acceptable to an MP. Nor should the whip be withdrawn for anyone who does. Remarkable faith in those who presented Truss as an option. They thought she was one of the best two they could offer.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 20 Oct 22 9.53pm | |
---|---|
It seems the normal leisure occupation for the average europpean is to get in some snacks and beers and have a good laugh at the UK political situation. And in a few days it is more of the same really it's repeat of Truss I can't believe members could have a part in deciding again. Johnson back? Nothing in bonkers Britain would surprise me. The UKs political system isn't fit for purpose.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 20 Oct 22 10.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
It seems the normal leisure occupation for the average europpean is to get in some snacks and beers and have a good laugh at the UK political situation. And in a few days it is more of the same really it's repeat of Truss I can't believe members could have a part in deciding again. Johnson back? Nothing in bonkers Britain would surprise me. The UKs political system isn't fit for purpose.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 20 Oct 22 11.03pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Remarkable faith in those who presented Truss as an option. They thought she was one of the best two they could offer. That's answered in the other thread.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 20 Oct 22 11.24pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
That's answered in the other thread. No it isn't. A conspiracy theory was put forward.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.