This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 16 Aug 16 1.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by 7mins
Sometimes, I feel that the liberal left are as much a danger on here. They seem to hold whites/police to a higher standard than blacks. If Zimmerman kills a black guy he is a prick (rightly so), we all condemn. Every 14hours a black man is killed by a fellow black man in Chicago.... No condemnation, is it that we expect that of blacks... They can't be helped, so why bother condemning them, they're a bunch of savages, would we expect any better? Spot on even Jamie the liberal flag bearer has admitted on this very thread that "rhetoric" is an ungainly by product in debates such as this, where some are to wrapped up in a liberal view point, that they can't see the wood for the trees, probably the same bunch that imagined everyone who voted for brexit was a knuckle dragging racist. You Just can't win with people who do not, or will not see that the different races within the human race are not the same and that until those markedly different traits are excepted, by those who are effected by them, and the people themselves nothing will ever change.
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 16 Aug 16 4.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by 7mins
Sometimes, I feel that the liberal left are as much a danger on here. They seem to hold whites/police to a higher standard than blacks. If Zimmerman kills a black guy he is a prick (rightly so), we all condemn. Every 14hours a black man is killed by a fellow black man in Chicago.... No condemnation, is it that we expect that of blacks... They can't be helped, so why bother condemning them, they're a bunch of savages, would we expect any better? Well police should be held to a higher standard than the average citizen for fairly obvious reasons, and it would be absurd to hold police to the same standards as ordinary citizens. By default all professionals are held to a higher standard, that's the nature of being a professional, undergoing professional training etc. The issue with black on black violence isn't relevant, because the criminal justice and law enforcement system in place deal, often excessively, with this problem. But there is a massive problem in parts of the US with how the police operate, how they're managed, how their actions are reviewed and oversight. There is also a massive problem in the US with guns and the willing acceptance of the use of lethal force as an immediate resort or response. On white and black, and typically the poor. US Policing policies have increasingly created a 'us and them' situation in poor communities regarding the police, of which the BLM has become a focus (largely because the white poor don't have a civil rights movement in place to protect them) My issue with the whole mess in the US is that only some citizens are deemed responsible for their actions not all, and that with the police in the US, there is a problem that's escalated out of the failure to implement responsibility and clear, independent oversight that is responsible for people being killed unnecessarily and by unprofessional police behaviour.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 17 Aug 16 10.05am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Well police should be held to a higher standard than the average citizen for fairly obvious reasons, and it would be absurd to hold police to the same standards as ordinary citizens. By default all professionals are held to a higher standard, that's the nature of being a professional, undergoing professional training etc. When their ultimate line of defence is used against them i.e. Guns, then just how are they supposed to take the moral high ground when a firearm arm is used against them. They are human after all Jamie, and with all the training in the world only an idiot with a death wish wouldn't fire if being fired upon. Point being is someone is waving a gun at you, the kill or be killed question comes into play and regardless of my personal training I know what I would do. The issue with black on black violence isn't relevant, because the criminal justice and law enforcement system in place deal, often excessively, with this problem. It is relevant in as much white cop on black person shootings, falls into insignificance when compared to black on black gun crime and murder, so where's the movement/group to protest about that ? The racist word or oppression can't be applied so it gets no traction. But there is a massive problem in parts of the US with how the police operate, how they're managed, how their actions are reviewed and oversight. There is also a massive problem in the US with guns and the willing acceptance of the use of lethal force as an immediate resort or response. On white and black, and typically the poor. Jamie as I said earlier, if the entire population of a country is allowed by law to carry a gun, then is it any surprise the Police do to ? I do however agree that some of the more shall we say "remote" areas in the US where 50 percent of the town is called cleetus, and the other half Mary Jane, (and Where the film Deliverance is used as an instructional sex ed film) the policing is as basic as the people living there. I also agree that there should be a complete overhaul of the way policing is done in the US. US Policing policies have increasingly created a 'us and them' situation in poor communities regarding the police, of which the BLM has become a focus (largely because the white poor don't have a civil rights movement in place to protect them) They are police officers, they are not there to be children's entertainers and your best mate, they are there to uphold the law and protect people from those who would break it. IMO you always tend to find groups like the BLM are spawned out of hatred for ones own lot in life, and an incorrect assumption that you are owed what your neighbour has, well no, actually your not. Your entitled to what you work for, not what you steal. My issue with the whole mess in the US is that only some citizens are deemed responsible for their actions not all, and that with the police in the US, there is a problem that's escalated out of the failure to implement responsibility and clear, independent oversight that is responsible for people being killed unnecessarily and by unprofessional police behaviour. The issue is not with the officers. Again as I stated before if someone reaches for a gun in a country where Police officers are shot and killed everyday and you also have a gun, it's self preservation. Killings of any race by police officers in the US of any race will continue until the gun issue is solved. No gun = no shootings. Edited by dannyh (17 Aug 2016 10.06am)
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 17 Aug 16 12.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dannyh
When their ultimate line of defence is used against them i.e. Guns, then just how are they supposed to take the moral high ground when a firearm arm is used against them. They are human after all Jamie, and with all the training in the world only an idiot with a death wish wouldn't fire if being fired upon. Point being is someone is waving a gun at you, the kill or be killed question comes into play and regardless of my personal training I know what I would do Context is everything. Police officers put in a shoot or be shot situation, aren't the issue. Its police officers who are responding with force disproportionate to the situation they're in. Being fired on, of course they have to respond to the situation they find themselves in. Police officers have to be as accountable for the use of force, because the state permits the use of force to them. Without establishing independently that the use of force was justified, the system just breaks down. But that's different that shooting people who are restrained, or in a car who've informed you they have a carry permit and a gun. Also situations where you shoot a 12 year old kid with a toy gun, within seconds of getting out the car, rather than controlling the situation are the problem. Then of course there is the case of people who are not armed, being shot by police officers. Which is different to a British police response to a suspected firearm, which is to control the scene, and try to avoid engaging in a shoot out. The police are more accountable because its their job. If I'm s**t at my job, make stupid mistakes and so on, I get sacked. But that's not the case, by a long shot. The police close ranks, and politicians and DA's dependent on police union support in elections, tend to protect officers, rather than establish a reasonable truth of events. When you join the police, like any profession, you're putting yourself into a situation where you are expected to react as an expert. For a police officer, that means expecting to be put into dangerous situations, and to control them. It cannot and shouldn't be that you get carte blanche to the use of force. Originally posted by dannyh
It is relevant in as much white cop on black person shootings, falls into insignificance when compared to black on black gun crime and murder, so where's the movement/group to protest about that ? The racist word or oppression can't be applied so it gets no traction. Black on Black Gun Crime is enforced by the police, and those people who killed those police men, were all arrested and charged - They don't need protest groups - job was done, they're dead or going to prison. How would a protest be valid... Protest typically reflects social injustice, not support for existing status quo, and there is definitely social injustice when it comes to the US criminal justice system and the poor. You have a situation where people are pleading guilty because the entire system is stacked against the poor. Originally posted by dannyh
Jamie as I said earlier, if the entire population of a country is allowed by law to carry a gun, then is it any surprise the Police do to ? I do however agree that some of the more shall we say "remote" areas in the US where 50 percent of the town is called cleetus, and the other half Mary Jane, (and Where the film Deliverance is used as an instructional sex ed film) the policing is as basic as the people living there. I also agree that there should be a complete overhaul of the way policing is done in the US. Very few people in the US are legally allowed to carry a gun, and all of them require a specific permit. Policing and training has to be conducted to higher standards when you're talking about licensing agents of the state and law enforcement to utilise lethal force against citizens. The US funding of the police in most of these areas is poor, the selection processes based around need not capacity, and you have officers with little more than accadamy training, put into deal with situations where a British Police Officer would likely have had two years training, two to five years experience and specialist training to deal with. Originally posted by dannyh
They are police officers, they are not there to be children's entertainers and your best mate, they are there to uphold the law and protect people from those who would break it. IMO you always tend to find groups like the BLM are spawned out of hatred for ones own lot in life, and an incorrect assumption that you are owed what your neighbour has, well no, actually your not. Your entitled to what you work for, not what you steal. I think BLM reflects a general issue in the US, but its only BLM that's heard, because the Black Civil Rights Movement in the US is a powerful lobby group and that's how US politics works. Shout the loudest, spend the most representation. Plenty of examples of similar situations in which whites have been killed, by police, but no one cares because the white poor do not have a voice. Obviously the police have a job to do. But they also have a wider requirement, they're also responsible for the protection of suspects and their rights. Its a tighter line to walk than most people, but when you sign up to become a police officer that's the job. Not to protect and serve those you like, but everyone. Even the people breaking the law. Originally posted by dannyh
The issue is not with the officers. Again as I stated before if someone reaches for a gun in a country where Police officers are shot and killed everyday and you also have a gun, it's self preservation. Killings of any race by police officers in the US of any race will continue until the gun issue is solved. No gun = no shootings. Yeah, but what about those shot and killed who are unarmed, suspicion of being armed is usually enough, and that's a very vague area. I agree, if someone is going to pull a gun, or you know they are armed and look likely to pull a gun, you may have to shoot someone. No one doubts that. But this isn't about those cases, and it shouldn't be, its about those cases where 'shootings are justified and accepted' where the use of force in any reasonable sense isn't defendable - even when a gun is present. And there seems to have been a lot of these in the US, not just of black people, but the homeless, mentall ill and the poor (irrespective of race), because the US upholds a defence of 'aggressively targeting the poor with zero tolerance policing'
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
7mins In the bush 17 Aug 16 1.49pm | |
---|---|
If social injustice feeds protest, would you support a White Lives Matter style protest directed at black people who commit far too much crime against them?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 17 Aug 16 1.51pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by 7mins
If social injustice feeds protest, would you support a White Lives Matter style protest directed at black people who commit far too much crime against them? I might if I lived in South Africa or Zimbabwe. But generally I'm too lazy.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 17 Aug 16 2.10pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by 7mins
If social injustice feeds protest, would you support a White Lives Matter style protest directed at black people who commit far too much crime against them? No, because its selectively racist and the police are notably very effective at pursuing crime committed by black people (given the rates of incarceration and zero tolerance programs aimed at black crime). I don't see what you'd be protesting - There is no social injustice to white people in how US law enforcement pursue crime committed by black people. I don't support BLM either, I support the idea that the police must be accountable in a clear and just manner for their action, irrespective of the race, social class, gender or sexuality. However, I do realise that BLM highlight a very valid issue with the use of excessive force, lethal force and how they target the poor (of all racial hues) and how the justice system fails the poor in the US time and again, which showing preference to offenders of middle and upper class groups. Its not a race thing, its a class thing.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 17 Aug 16 2.11pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
I might if I lived in South Africa or Zimbabwe. But generally I'm too lazy. That's because as far as the state of SA and Zimbabwe go, White Lives Don't Matter (although in fairness neither do most black lives either...).
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
7mins In the bush 17 Aug 16 3.13pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
No, because its selectively racist and the police are notably very effective at pursuing crime committed by black people (given the rates of incarceration and zero tolerance programs aimed at black crime). I don't see what you'd be protesting - There is no social injustice to white people in how US law enforcement pursue crime committed by black people. I don't support BLM either, I support the idea that the police must be accountable in a clear and just manner for their action, irrespective of the race, social class, gender or sexuality. However, I do realise that BLM highlight a very valid issue with the use of excessive force, lethal force and how they target the poor (of all racial hues) and how the justice system fails the poor in the US time and again, which showing preference to offenders of middle and upper class groups. Its not a race thing, its a class thing. I've never heard BLM matter complain about the poor being targeted. I have heard them accuse police of "systematically mudering" black people, even when black people fired at police first. Edited by 7mins (17 Aug 2016 3.14pm) Edited by 7mins (17 Aug 2016 3.15pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 17 Aug 16 3.17pm | |
---|---|
Rich people's crimes seem to be more embezzlement or fraud, tax evasion those kind of things - sometimes for massive amounts of money. Perhaps BLM would be happier if we shot people for these kind of things and even things up a bit.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
7mins In the bush 17 Aug 16 3.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
No, because its selectively racist and the police are notably very effective at pursuing crime committed by black people (given the rates of incarceration and zero tolerance programs aimed at black crime). I don't see what you'd be protesting - There is no social injustice to white people in how US law enforcement pursue crime committed by black people. I don't support BLM either, I support the idea that the police must be accountable in a clear and just manner for their action, irrespective of the race, social class, gender or sexuality. However, I do realise that BLM highlight a very valid issue with the use of excessive force, lethal force and how they target the poor (of all racial hues) and how the justice system fails the poor in the US time and again, which showing preference to offenders of middle and upper class groups. Its not a race thing, its a class thing. Are you suggesting the police investigate "black crime" more throughly than any other crime.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
7mins In the bush 17 Aug 16 3.27pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Rich people's crimes seem to be more embezzlement or fraud, tax evasion those kind of things - sometimes for massive amounts of money. Perhaps BLM would be happier if we shot people for these kind of things and even things up a bit. I listened to a (black) police officer justify why black people are stopped and searched more than any other races.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.