What are you going on about?

Of course, sitting around doing nothing but sing hopeful songs won't work.

And of course we need to detect and punish criminals. No-one argues any differentlyThe argument is about how you treat the overwhelming majority of law abiding, decent people who just happen to believe in, or have a cultural link to, islam.

Some here wish to lump everybody together and put Islam in the dock. Which I argue is counter-productive and would make matters much worse.

Our country's general strategy is a gradual integration via education, which seems the most sensible and achievable long-term solution. For which I see no viable alternative.

Going hard after the criminals is something I fully support. But not after the innocent.

It won't.

There is not the remotest chance of any Muslim nation having the capacity to invade us. They have neither the firepower or logistics to do it. It's a non-starter.

What we have to fear most is nuclear terrorism. That's a real threat.

Once again this isn't the point. No one wants to demonise innocent people. The issue is that cultural sensibilities don't matter when the law has been broken. Robinson made some allegations which were correct but they were dismissed and many more girls suffered as a result.

So no more pulling down the statues of historic characters. Fine. Forgive and forget is the watchword.

What needs to understood is that there is a certain type of person who would rather attack people that they perceive to be on the Right of politics rather than ever recognize the many problems that immigration has brought to our door, or accept that sometimes the safety of British citizens comes before tolerance'.
They don't accept that they were wrong in the past or the present, or that their attitudes will negatively impact our future.

In effect, they tolerate the intolerant and undesirable, while decrying anyone who doesn't. They put ideology above all things.

That's not the issue though is it? Of course, cultural issues don't matter when the law is broken. I have never argued otherwise and reinforce that now. The law applies to all.

Yaxley-Lennon did not simply "make some accusations". If he truly wanted to help, and had evidence that would have assisted the authorities, there are ways to have done so quietly and effectively.

Y-L has another agenda. He is an attention-seeking rabble rouser who likes to wind up a certain segment of society, then claim he needs funds to continue his "Work". He has done very well out of this and, so far as I am aware, has not donated a penny to any of the abused children he claims to care about. He is a fraud.