This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Coutts VS Nigel Farage
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
  georgenorman  29 Jul 23 9.39am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
That’s a coincidence, it’s about the same percentage of posts from Wisbech that appear on any given thread.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
HKOwen  Hong Kong 29 Jul 23 9.44am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by georgenorman
As is often the case with you, what you say is simply not true. You have made various, predictable attacks on Farage but have not shown that he was hypocritical in relation to the Coutts affair. Refer my comment on debate with ideologues in post above
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 29 Jul 23 9.48am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by HKOwen
Describing your posts as I see them is not to my thinking insulting, if you choose to be insulted then that is fine. Farage was de-banked because of Coutts/Natwest opinion of his views, because they chose not to like them does not make them wrong or right. Banks are not arbiters of right and wrong. Millions of UK citizens agree with Farage's views. Feel free to give me no attention at all. Rational debate is seldom possible with an ideologue with an odd perception of fact and fiction. Carry on
Edited by HKOwen (29 Jul 2023 9.24am) I just double-checked. There wasn't a single word about the subject of the thread. Not one! It was in response to a comment of mine but was entirely criticising me and not addressing the content of the comment in any way at all. It was 100% ad hominem, something you are very frequently guilty of. It seems you just cannot help yourself. Maybe you need to find some help elsewhere? For the umpteenth time in this thread, Farage was not debanked because Coutts has an opinion on his views. That they described those views in the internal document that was acquired and circulated by Farage doesn't change that fact. Farage has spun it that way, for his own reasons, but it isn't true. Describing him as they did was simply part of the process of constructing the rationale for why an association with him could lead to reputational damage. Perhaps that's too subtle a difference for some to understand, but it is the vital difference between what Farage suggests, and the truth. Millions of citizens may well agree with Farage. There are after all 60 million of us. Many more millions don't and for that, I give a hearty sigh of relief.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 29 Jul 23 9.51am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by georgenorman
As is often the case with you, what you say is simply not true. You have made various, predictable attacks on Farage but have not shown that he was hypocritical in relation to the Coutts affair. That you cannot see it is as predictable as the sun rising this morning.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Teddy Eagle  29 Jul 23 9.54am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I just double-checked. There wasn't a single word about the subject of the thread. Not one! It was in response to a comment of mine but was entirely criticising me and not addressing the content of the comment in any way at all. It was 100% ad hominem, something you are very frequently guilty of. It seems you just cannot help yourself. Maybe you need to find some help elsewhere? For the umpteenth time in this thread, Farage was not debanked because Coutts has an opinion on his views. That they described those views in the internal document that was acquired and circulated by Farage doesn't change that fact. Farage has spun it that way, for his own reasons, but it isn't true. Describing him as they did was simply part of the process of constructing the rationale for why an association with him could lead to reputational damage. Perhaps that's too subtle a difference for some to understand, but it is the vital difference between what Farage suggests, and the truth. Millions of citizens may well agree with Farage. There are after all 60 million of us. Many more millions don't and for that, I give a hearty sigh of relief. Once again, why won't Nat West suffer the same reputational damage by holding his account?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| georgenorman 29 Jul 23 10.07am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
You can spurt as much squid ink as you like, it doesn’t change the fact that you have not described how Farage was hypocritical in relation to the Coutts affair.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Spiderman Horsham 29 Jul 23 10.28am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
72.3 Any links please? What were the demographics of those asked? As with all polls there will be some who said yes but then vote no. Edited by Spiderman (29 Jul 2023 10.29am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| HKOwen Hong Kong 29 Jul 23 10.40am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I just double-checked. There wasn't a single word about the subject of the thread. Not one! It was in response to a comment of mine but was entirely criticising me and not addressing the content of the comment in any way at all. It was 100% ad hominem, something you are very frequently guilty of. It seems you just cannot help yourself. Maybe you need to find some help elsewhere? For the umpteenth time in this thread, Farage was not debanked because Coutts has an opinion on his views. That they described those views in the internal document that was acquired and circulated by Farage doesn't change that fact. Farage has spun it that way, for his own reasons, but it isn't true. Describing him as they did was simply part of the process of constructing the rationale for why an association with him could lead to reputational damage. Perhaps that's too subtle a difference for some to understand, but it is the vital difference between what Farage suggests, and the truth. Millions of citizens may well agree with Farage. There are after all 60 million of us. Many more millions don't and for that, I give a hearty sigh of relief. What does find some help mean? You seem to be implying I am mentally ill.
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| eaglesdare 29 Jul 23 11.04am |
|
|---|---|
|
At the end of the day Farage has highlighted a deeply concerning issue that left alone could have affected everyone of us. He has not just fought the good fight for people who agrees with him but everyone! Regardless of their political view including the likes of wisbech eagle. And we should all be backing Farage on this one. It won't be long before woke looney lefties have died down anyway! They have really overplayed thier hand of late.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Teddy Eagle 29 Jul 23 11.19am |
|
|---|---|
|
This is from Wiki. After submitting a subject access request in July, Farage published a 40-page internal document from the bank, which contained minutes from a meeting of the bank's Wealth Reputational Risk Committee on 17 November 2022, describing Farage as a "disingenuous grifter" who promoted "xenophobic, chauvinistic and racist views", and said his "views were at odds with our position as an inclusive organisation", with "risk factors including... controversial public statements which were felt to conflict with the bank’s purpose"
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| HKOwen Hong Kong 29 Jul 23 12.22pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
This is from Wiki. After submitting a subject access request in July, Farage published a 40-page internal document from the bank, which contained minutes from a meeting of the bank's Wealth Reputational Risk Committee on 17 November 2022, describing Farage as a "disingenuous grifter" who promoted "xenophobic, chauvinistic and racist views", and said his "views were at odds with our position as an inclusive organisation", with "risk factors including... controversial public statements which were felt to conflict with the bank’s purpose" Pesky facts
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 29 Jul 23 12.27pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I don’t think he is a xenophobic racist on a personal level. I think he courts xenophobic racists with his rhetoric and propaganda. So, wishing to stop illegal immigrants arriving and cutting immigration to an already densely populated island is racist and xenophobic? You really are the problem. As I previously stated, he represents the majority. Brexit has not failed as you know full well, much to your disappointment. It's no surprise that an ageing deluded globalist would not care about Britain. No doubt you are still hoping for a world government where the massively overpopulated planet is governed by a handful of unelected bureaucrats and where only right thinking are allowed to be proper people and the dissenters have to live in the wilderness with no access to finance. There is stupid and then there is Wisbech. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (29 Jul 2023 6.48pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.