I am sure some do. However do not under estimate how many are incredibly unhappy. Unhappy with the attacks, unhappy with Shami Chakrabarti and how she was "rewarded" and unhappy with Corbyn's lack of leadership on the issue

Before the EU Referendum, the Remain camp told us that the economy would collapse, the pound would fall 20% against the dollar, the FTSE would nosedive and companies flee from Britain. None of this has of course happened, apart from a much less steep fall in the value of the pound. Instead the FTSE has reached record highs, the economy has grown and companies are investing in Britain.
However, if Corbyn's Labour are elected all of the dire predictions would come to pass - in spades. Yet many of the very people who tried to scare us with the doom-mongering are telling us to vote Labour.

We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

There are a few reports about library service reductions in which councillors talk about the need for austerity, as if austerity were some new-fangled wheeze that just occurred to them: "Tell you what, Reg, Linda, why don't we all tighten our belts and safeguard the service?" Oh, never heard that one before and of course, far from safeguarding any of the services given a quick austerity fix, those services have been pauperised then privatised. Austerity was always a delusion, a fundamental shift of wealth, control and influence from public service to private acquisition, from poor to rich.
Austerity crucified Greece, plunging it into a shattering economic crisis reminiscent of the 1930s. George Osborne missed every deficit target while administering it and added half a trillion pounds to the national debt. As the International Monetary Fund noted, they had "massively understated the damage that spending cuts inflict on a weak economy” and found that all economic research backing austerity “has been discredited.” Nonetheless lamentable George Osborne declared austerity permanent and his successor Philip Hammond continues to argue its effectiveness against all the arguments to the contrary. May is a permanent austerian too, in as much as she has any ideology except her own career and the electoral fortunes of the Tory Party as the key body defending British capital. UK wages are growing more slowly than in any European nation except Greece with very high numbers of short term, part time and 'self-employed' jobs explaining the Tories boast about high employment.
Austerity was always a con. It is now a demonstrably bankrupt one.

Never heard such nonsense about the TV debate for some time.

It has been reported that Mrs May will appear in a 'Question Time' format rather than a head-to-head debate where the format favours opposition parties.

TV debates in the past have turned elections into a 'X Factor' type talent show. Why should Mrs May demean her 'High office' by agreeing to equal billing with political 'Lightweights', some might deem misfits, who are united only in their hostility to Brexit and the Conservative Party ?

Anyway I've got a busy day out campaigning etc so no more from me today on this thread.

By all accounts ITV will empty chair her. (may not Willo)

They will be wrong to if they do. Trying to bully her, or anyone in to appearing is wrong.

Empty chairing smacks of political bias too.