You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)
November 24 2024 3.55pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

BBC (again)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 344 of 435 < 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 >

  

silvertop Flag Portishead 15 Oct 23 4.12pm Send a Private Message to silvertop Add silvertop as a friend

Originally posted by georgenorman

You don't have to experience something to have a view on its morality. I've never murdered anyone but I think murder is immoral.

Point dodged. People are alleging bbc bias by wrongly claiming certain issues are not being reported on a medium they neither watch nor listen to.

They are also wrong to single out the bbc in that what they abhor (eg not calling Hamas terrorists) applies accross the broadcast media.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
silvertop Flag Portishead 15 Oct 23 4.13pm Send a Private Message to silvertop Add silvertop as a friend

Originally posted by HKOwen

I couldn't see anything on BBC website about Louvre.If I missed it fair enough if someone can send a link.

I heard it on R4 news on the hour.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 15 Oct 23 4.32pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by silvertop

Point dodged. People are alleging bbc bias by wrongly claiming certain issues are not being reported on a medium they neither watch nor listen to.

They are also wrong to single out the bbc in that what they abhor (eg not calling Hamas terrorists) applies accross the broadcast media.

I would respect the BBC's position more if they actually were politically neutral.....or at least genuinely tried to be.

However, their website for example does show its colours in what it chooses to highlight, how long and often and in what it won't represent.

It's essentially whatever the liberal establishment think filtered through some rules that they try to bend....like only representing the opposing opinion sparingly and at the end of a story.

The BBC had the chance to try to ensure that who it employed reflected the political composition of the country when it internally debated this over twenty years ago.....Tellingly it rejected the chance....It's far happier instead to over represent ethnic and other minority groups in its output rather than reflect the reality that not everyone agrees with their neo and social liberalism.

That was the chance to ensure the long term survival of the BBC....I've said it before and I'll say it now. That decision has been its death bell as the institution it was.

For example, I'm a social conservative and what exists for me there? Why would any social conservative be happy funding the BBC?

Edited by Stirlingsays (15 Oct 2023 4.37pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
silvertop Flag Portishead 15 Oct 23 8.57pm Send a Private Message to silvertop Add silvertop as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

I would respect the BBC's position more if they actually were politically neutral.....or at least genuinely tried to be.

However, their website for example does show its colours in what it chooses to highlight, how long and often and in what it won't represent.

It's essentially whatever the liberal establishment think filtered through some rules that they try to bend....like only representing the opposing opinion sparingly and at the end of a story.

The BBC had the chance to try to ensure that who it employed reflected the political composition of the country when it internally debated this over twenty years ago.....Tellingly it rejected the chance....It's far happier instead to over represent ethnic and other minority groups in its output rather than reflect the reality that not everyone agrees with their neo and social liberalism.

That was the chance to ensure the long term survival of the BBC....I've said it before and I'll say it now. That decision has been its death bell as the institution it was.

For example, I'm a social conservative and what exists for me there? Why would any social conservative be happy funding the BBC?

Edited by Stirlingsays (15 Oct 2023 4.37pm)

By seeking to steer a middle ground they will upset everyone.

However your reference to ethnic inclusively draws a point I must have now said 3 times on this thread alone. It has been a statutory requirement since the Tories subjected them (and ch4) to the provisions of the Equality Act. It must really annoy 75% + of those still watching which, of course, suits the very party who enacted it and who are ideologically opposed to the channel.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards georgenorman Flag 15 Oct 23 10.04pm Send a Private Message to georgenorman Add georgenorman as a friend

Originally posted by silvertop

By seeking to steer a middle ground they will upset everyone.

However your reference to ethnic inclusively draws a point I must have now said 3 times on this thread alone. It has been a statutory requirement since the Tories subjected them (and ch4) to the provisions of the Equality Act. It must really annoy 75% + of those still watching which, of course, suits the very party who enacted it and who are ideologically opposed to the channel.

They clearly steer anything but a 'middle ground'.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 15 Oct 23 11.55pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by silvertop

By seeking to steer a middle ground they will upset everyone.

You very obviously regard neo and social liberalism as a 'middle ground'. I have to inform you that I very much do not. I regard it as a conduit to disaster.

Originally posted by silvertop

However your reference to ethnic inclusively draws a point I must have now said 3 times on this thread alone. It has been a statutory requirement since the Tories subjected them (and ch4) to the provisions of the Equality Act. It must really annoy 75% + of those still watching which, of course, suits the very party who enacted it and who are ideologically opposed to the channel.

Indeed.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards georgenorman Flag 16 Oct 23 6.39am Send a Private Message to georgenorman Add georgenorman as a friend

Originally posted by silvertop

Point dodged. People are alleging bbc bias by wrongly claiming certain issues are not being reported on a medium they neither watch nor listen to.

They are also wrong to single out the bbc in that what they abhor (eg not calling Hamas terrorists) applies accross the broadcast media.

I wasn't dodging anything, I was merely responding to your Mary Whitehouse remark.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
silvertop Flag Portishead 16 Oct 23 11.09am Send a Private Message to silvertop Add silvertop as a friend

Originally posted by georgenorman

They clearly steer anything but a 'middle ground'.

I have sat in a room full of genuine lefty types who spat in disgust at the OBVIOUS right wing bias of BBC news reporting.

By your use of the word "clearly" are you, therefore, echoing their thoughts and believe there should be a shift to the left to bring it in line with more centrist views?

I jest, of course, but you get the point. If the BBC are upsetting you and that unwashed lefty mob, they are arguably doing something right.

I just wish they could drop all the inclusivity cr@p. It is social engineering by crow bar.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 16 Oct 23 11.24am Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by silvertop

I have sat in a room full of genuine lefty types who spat in disgust at the OBVIOUS right wing bias of BBC news reporting.

By your use of the word "clearly" are you, therefore, echoing their thoughts and believe there should be a shift to the left to bring it in line with more centrist views?

I jest, of course, but you get the point. If the BBC are upsetting you and that unwashed lefty mob, they are arguably doing something right.

I just wish they could drop all the inclusivity cr@p. It is social engineering by crow bar.

The Left hate the establishment full stop. They wish to destroy everything and replace it with chaos.
Considering the BBC to be Right Wing simply illustrates their extremism.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (16 Oct 2023 11.24am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Nicholas91 Flag The Democratic Republic of Kent 16 Oct 23 12.56pm Send a Private Message to Nicholas91 Add Nicholas91 as a friend

IMHO, the BBC is treading a fine line in actually reporting that which constitutes 'news' these days. It has to cater to the majority both politically and socially.

If we were under a government, or living within a 'far-right' period we might see more reporting on ethnic minority crime, the perils of mass immigration and critiques of left wing narcissism driven by failure in life nonsense, as a very poor example. As it is however, I did go on the website the other day where it seemed to be a collage of 'trans this', 'hate/thought crime that' and daily update on just about anything non-white or heterosexual.

I think in any instance, if you are inclined to either end of the spectrum, you are swayed to complain about anything that doesn't suit your particular mindset or outlook. Inevitably, the BBC will fail to cater to both sides or all and naturally fall afoul and to a greater degree the further to one side anybody is.

It is slightly more to the left as I see it, as the world is these days, but won't cater to the real extremes of the left or those to the right with any enthusiasm - they're doing their best in an increasingly polarised culture, I'd humbly suggest. It fails spectacularly in it's continued employment of Garth Crooks and lack of Palace coverage however. I may be slightly bias there, I'll concede that.

 


Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Behind Enemy Lines Flag Sussex 16 Oct 23 2.41pm Send a Private Message to Behind Enemy Lines Add Behind Enemy Lines as a friend

Originally posted by Nicholas91

IMHO, the BBC is treading a fine line in actually reporting that which constitutes 'news' these days. It has to cater to the majority both politically and socially.

If we were under a government, or living within a 'far-right' period we might see more reporting on ethnic minority crime, the perils of mass immigration and critiques of left wing narcissism driven by failure in life nonsense, as a very poor example. As it is however, I did go on the website the other day where it seemed to be a collage of 'trans this', 'hate/thought crime that' and daily update on just about anything non-white or heterosexual.

I think in any instance, if you are inclined to either end of the spectrum, you are swayed to complain about anything that doesn't suit your particular mindset or outlook. Inevitably, the BBC will fail to cater to both sides or all and naturally fall afoul and to a greater degree the further to one side anybody is.

It is slightly more to the left as I see it, as the world is these days, but won't cater to the real extremes of the left or those to the right with any enthusiasm - they're doing their best in an increasingly polarised culture, I'd humbly suggest. It fails spectacularly in it's continued employment of Garth Crooks and lack of Palace coverage however. I may be slightly bias there, I'll concede that.

If the public think that the BBC doesn’t represent a fair reflection of what is happening in society then an alternative will evolve; GB News being an example.

 


hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Nicholas91 Flag The Democratic Republic of Kent 16 Oct 23 3.47pm Send a Private Message to Nicholas91 Add Nicholas91 as a friend

Originally posted by Behind Enemy Lines

If the public think that the BBC doesn’t represent a fair reflection of what is happening in society then an alternative will evolve; GB News being an example.

Or I'd argue, if the public demands to see their increasingly extreme and polarised views on society represented, the demand for outlets providing this will rise.

It sometimes feels as though you either identify as a manifestation of your own narcissism, hate the nuclear family and wish to see all traditional cultural and elsewise structures crumble these days to justify your own failure, or you're an equally angry right wing reincarnation of a certain Austrian from history.

Some people are just left in the middle however, considering the above a circus which makes no sense and despising the polar ends of this spectrum equally. The majority of these people are found in every day circumstances with the aforementioned predominantly found online. Then you get the real weirdos, who support clubs like Palace and spend time that should be dedicated to work on one of it's supporters forums during the day

In any instance, the BBC does a decent job serving people within the middle of the chaos and will increasingly come under attack from those pushing further to the ends of the political spectrum, as an almost natural and logical course. It of course always will employ individuals too, and individuals are not without any bias whatsoever, so may stray from time to time but I would suggest within a reasonable spectrum.

I use it and shall continue to do until such time I think it has pushed beyond a certain limit. It's far from that for now as I see it, even if some things/articles/commentaries irk me occasionally.

 


Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 344 of 435 < 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)