Nowcast has Tories gaining 23 and Labour losing 13 seats

for what it is worth

[Link]

I agree......Neither of them are good speakers or campaigners.

Corbyn represents real 'progressive/regressive' politics so he does motivate his base but as an actual speaker he's a dirge.

May just doesn't cut it either.....Still should have debated though....Not a good look.

Not though it makes any difference.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Strange thing is they both debate each other every week in the PMQs. She should of been in the debate to focus more on SNP, and keep Labour at bay.

imo SNP are at their weakest, as they try to appeal with a broader policy rather than the one policy they already lost.

Can you show me anything demonstrates this? All I've seen is statements to the effect that their priority is the interests of the EU-27, they want a good and positive relationship going forward and before any negotiations on a deal can commence there first needs to be agreement on the divorce bill, irish border and rights on EU nationals. The 100bn figure hasn't actually been endorsed by the EU-27.

I agree that it is in the interests of all to be sensible and try and reach a mutually beneficial solution. Shame that May, Davis, Boris etc are doing their best to start us off on the wrong foot and making threats.

Given the general expectation I think Corbyn has had quite a good campaign and has spoken quite well. He's no Barrack Obama, but he's no Theresa May either.

I agree. Much better campaign than May. Though he may of been overshadowed if there was a more Centrist candidate.

She shouldn't use the PMQs as an excuse. I was using that as to why she didn't debate on TV if she does it frequently. Doesn't really make sense.

Edited by Hansy (07 Jun 2017 3.42pm)