They have no connection to the context.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Oh, right. That's that then.

This was posted recently, and subsequently denied as relevant when I pointed out it was nonsense:-

“Well, it's about where your genetics come from.....they have to come from that region and that can be proven or disproven by a simple biological sample.

The religion you stamp on them is for that individual....or imprinted on them anyway”

Having some time this evening I asked ChatGPT for its opinion. Guess what? It could have been written by me!

“The concept of race is a social construct, not a biological one. While there are genetic differences among human populations, the genetic variation within any so-called racial group is much larger than the variation between different racial groups. In other words, there is more genetic diversity within racial groups than between them.

It's important to recognize that the idea of race has been used historically to justify discrimination and inequality. Modern scientific understanding emphasizes the shared genetic heritage of all human beings and the importance of addressing social and economic disparities based on accurate and meaningful criteria rather than outdated and flawed notions of race.”

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Which has access to a lot more information than anyone on this site.

That my own opinions resemble its analysis I find reassuring and pretty conclusive.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

I have a degree in computing and went on to teach it....it's really quite sad to see this.

He actually seems to thinks that an AI program programmed by progressives is some sort of independent answer. The answer here comes straight from the progressive handbook.

When AI programs were first introduced they were putting out all sorts of based opinions which caused problems and complaints from the left and progressives....so they were reprogramed to stick to particular lanes with the issues involved sociopolitical issues like these.

That's precisely what you see here.

Just more misinformation from a source that's quite frankly endless.

Edited by Stirlingsays (22 Oct 2023 12.02am)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

As anyone with a degree in computing will know an AI chat bot will look at all information sources. It won’t have a political bias. It will weigh the evidence and produce a balanced reply. If science has found new peer reviewed answers they get heavier weighting.

The idea that “progressives” are somehow responsible for out dated opinions not receiving heavy weighting just demonstrates once again that some people posting here have a poor grasp of reality. They seem to think that progress is a political construct.

Anyone who introduces Hitler into an argument is said to have lost it. I asked ChatGPT if Hitler was a good man. The reply was:-

“No, Adolf Hitler was not a good man. He was a dictator who led Nazi Germany and was responsible for the Holocaust, the systematic genocide of approximately six million Jews and millions of others, including Romani people, LGBTQ+ individuals, disabled individuals, and political dissidents. Hitler's aggressive foreign policies and militaristic actions also led to World War II, resulting in the deaths of tens of millions of people. His ideologies and actions have been universally condemned for their cruelty, racism, and disregard for human rights. Hitler's legacy is one of hate, intolerance, and immense human suffering.”

Nothing from Mein Kampf there.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.