Is Islam, the new Nazi ?

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Is Islam, the new Nazi ?

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 34 of 41 < 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 >

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 10 Jul 14 10.26pm
Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.22pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.19pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.16pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.05pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.02pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 9.48pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 9.21pm Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm ^^^^^^ "The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood." He's got that one correct. Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm) Interesting that despite an article full of criticism about UAF, including the bigotry espoused by many of its members, you choose to stick your head in the sand and ignore this, instead making a jibe at vile nazis who cannot be taken seriously. You are a strange one. On the one hand claiming that a vote of UKIP is a vote for a legion of bigots taking over high political office in ten years time, whilst selectively ignoring the blatant bigotry practiced by a sizeable proportion of the members of a group you support. Sizeable proportion- can you define what you mean by this-over 50%? 10%? Read the article, there are plenty more on the net, and make your own mind up Trotsky. Whatever I say will be incorrect in your mind. Plus, another lefty not acknowledging the bigotry present in UAF. Why could that be? I'm not denying their are some dodgy people affiliated with UAF. It was a simple question Matt, one I'm sure that you can answer. How many do you define as a sizable proportion? As I said, make your mind up. I know what I think. However, that will be wrong in your mind and I am sick of your diversionary bulls*** when you don't like the questions being asked, which you are doing by asking this. Also, I think you need to read on economics and understand a bit more about that subject. Nighty night Trotsky. Answer the very very simple question. What do you define as a sizeable proportion? Read about economics. So you can't define what a sizable proportion is, even though you claim to know what you mean, you can't let everyone else know. My guess is that there are a few bad eggs in the UAF and that you are exagerating how many there actually are.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 10 Jul 14 10.26pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.19pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.16pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.05pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.02pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 9.48pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 9.21pm

Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm

^^^^^^

"The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood."

He's got that one correct.

Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm)

Interesting that despite an article full of criticism about UAF, including the bigotry espoused by many of its members, you choose to stick your head in the sand and ignore this, instead making a jibe at vile nazis who cannot be taken seriously.

You are a strange one. On the one hand claiming that a vote of UKIP is a vote for a legion of bigots taking over high political office in ten years time, whilst selectively ignoring the blatant bigotry practiced by a sizeable proportion of the members of a group you support.

Sizeable proportion- can you define what you mean by this-over 50%? 10%?

Read the article, there are plenty more on the net, and make your own mind up Trotsky. Whatever I say will be incorrect in your mind.

Plus, another lefty not acknowledging the bigotry present in UAF. Why could that be?

I'm not denying their are some dodgy people affiliated with UAF. It was a simple question Matt, one I'm sure that you can answer. How many do you define as a sizable proportion?

As I said, make your mind up. I know what I think. However, that will be wrong in your mind and I am sick of your diversionary bulls*** when you don't like the questions being asked, which you are doing by asking this.

Also, I think you need to read on economics and understand a bit more about that subject. Nighty night Trotsky.

Answer the very very simple question. What do you define as a sizeable proportion?

Read about economics.

So you can't define what a sizable proportion is, even though you claim to know what you mean, you can't let everyone else know.
My guess is that there are a few bad eggs in the UAF and that you are exagerating how many there actually are.

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 10 Jul 14 10.35pm
Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.26pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.22pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.19pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.16pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.05pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.02pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 9.48pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 9.21pm Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm ^^^^^^ "The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood." He's got that one correct. Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm) Interesting that despite an article full of criticism about UAF, including the bigotry espoused by many of its members, you choose to stick your head in the sand and ignore this, instead making a jibe at vile nazis who cannot be taken seriously. You are a strange one. On the one hand claiming that a vote of UKIP is a vote for a legion of bigots taking over high political office in ten years time, whilst selectively ignoring the blatant bigotry practiced by a sizeable proportion of the members of a group you support. Sizeable proportion- can you define what you mean by this-over 50%? 10%? Read the article, there are plenty more on the net, and make your own mind up Trotsky. Whatever I say will be incorrect in your mind. Plus, another lefty not acknowledging the bigotry present in UAF. Why could that be? I'm not denying their are some dodgy people affiliated with UAF. It was a simple question Matt, one I'm sure that you can answer. How many do you define as a sizable proportion? As I said, make your mind up. I know what I think. However, that will be wrong in your mind and I am sick of your diversionary bulls*** when you don't like the questions being asked, which you are doing by asking this. Also, I think you need to read on economics and understand a bit more about that subject. Nighty night Trotsky. Answer the very very simple question. What do you define as a sizeable proportion? Read about economics. So you can't define what a sizable proportion is, even though you claim to know what you mean, you can't let everyone else know. My guess is that there are a few bad eggs in the UAF and that you are exagerating how many there actually are. You can think what you want. Don't make it right though. "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 10 Jul 14 10.35pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.26pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.19pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.16pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.05pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.02pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 9.48pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 9.21pm

Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm

^^^^^^

"The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood."

He's got that one correct.

Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm)

Sizeable proportion- can you define what you mean by this-over 50%? 10%?

Read the article, there are plenty more on the net, and make your own mind up Trotsky. Whatever I say will be incorrect in your mind.

Plus, another lefty not acknowledging the bigotry present in UAF. Why could that be?

I'm not denying their are some dodgy people affiliated with UAF. It was a simple question Matt, one I'm sure that you can answer. How many do you define as a sizable proportion?

Also, I think you need to read on economics and understand a bit more about that subject. Nighty night Trotsky.

Answer the very very simple question. What do you define as a sizeable proportion?

Read about economics.

You can think what you want. Don't make it right though.

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 10 Jul 14 10.40pm
Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.35pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.26pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.22pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.19pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.16pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.05pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.02pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 9.48pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 9.21pm Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm ^^^^^^ "The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood." He's got that one correct. Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm) Interesting that despite an article full of criticism about UAF, including the bigotry espoused by many of its members, you choose to stick your head in the sand and ignore this, instead making a jibe at vile nazis who cannot be taken seriously. You are a strange one. On the one hand claiming that a vote of UKIP is a vote for a legion of bigots taking over high political office in ten years time, whilst selectively ignoring the blatant bigotry practiced by a sizeable proportion of the members of a group you support. Sizeable proportion- can you define what you mean by this-over 50%? 10%? Read the article, there are plenty more on the net, and make your own mind up Trotsky. Whatever I say will be incorrect in your mind. Plus, another lefty not acknowledging the bigotry present in UAF. Why could that be? I'm not denying their are some dodgy people affiliated with UAF. It was a simple question Matt, one I'm sure that you can answer. How many do you define as a sizable proportion? As I said, make your mind up. I know what I think. However, that will be wrong in your mind and I am sick of your diversionary bulls*** when you don't like the questions being asked, which you are doing by asking this. Also, I think you need to read on economics and understand a bit more about that subject. Nighty night Trotsky. Answer the very very simple question. What do you define as a sizeable proportion? Read about economics. So you can't define what a sizable proportion is, even though you claim to know what you mean, you can't let everyone else know. My guess is that there are a few bad eggs in the UAF and that you are exagerating how many there actually are. You can think what you want. Don't make it right .though. there you go then. You can't answer a simple question. Goodnight.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 10 Jul 14 10.40pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.35pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.26pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.19pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.16pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.05pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.02pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 9.48pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 9.21pm

Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm

^^^^^^

"The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood."

He's got that one correct.

Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm)

Sizeable proportion- can you define what you mean by this-over 50%? 10%?

Read the article, there are plenty more on the net, and make your own mind up Trotsky. Whatever I say will be incorrect in your mind.

Plus, another lefty not acknowledging the bigotry present in UAF. Why could that be?

I'm not denying their are some dodgy people affiliated with UAF. It was a simple question Matt, one I'm sure that you can answer. How many do you define as a sizable proportion?

Also, I think you need to read on economics and understand a bit more about that subject. Nighty night Trotsky.

Answer the very very simple question. What do you define as a sizeable proportion?

Read about economics.

You can think what you want. Don't make it right .though.

there you go then. You can't answer a simple question. Goodnight.

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 10 Jul 14 10.44pm
Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.40pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.35pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.26pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.22pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.19pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.16pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.05pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.02pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 9.48pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 9.21pm Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm ^^^^^^ "The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood." He's got that one correct. Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm) Interesting that despite an article full of criticism about UAF, including the bigotry espoused by many of its members, you choose to stick your head in the sand and ignore this, instead making a jibe at vile nazis who cannot be taken seriously. You are a strange one. On the one hand claiming that a vote of UKIP is a vote for a legion of bigots taking over high political office in ten years time, whilst selectively ignoring the blatant bigotry practiced by a sizeable proportion of the members of a group you support. Sizeable proportion- can you define what you mean by this-over 50%? 10%? Read the article, there are plenty more on the net, and make your own mind up Trotsky. Whatever I say will be incorrect in your mind. Plus, another lefty not acknowledging the bigotry present in UAF. Why could that be? I'm not denying their are some dodgy people affiliated with UAF. It was a simple question Matt, one I'm sure that you can answer. How many do you define as a sizable proportion? As I said, make your mind up. I know what I think. However, that will be wrong in your mind and I am sick of your diversionary bulls*** when you don't like the questions being asked, which you are doing by asking this. Also, I think you need to read on economics and understand a bit more about that subject. Nighty night Trotsky. Answer the very very simple question. What do you define as a sizeable proportion? Read about economics. So you can't define what a sizable proportion is, even though you claim to know what you mean, you can't let everyone else know. My guess is that there are a few bad eggs in the UAF and that you are exagerating how many there actually are. You can think what you want. Don't make it right .though. there you go then. You can't answer a simple question. Goodnight. No. I refused to play your diversionary games. "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 10 Jul 14 10.44pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.40pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.35pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.26pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.19pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.16pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.05pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.02pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 9.48pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 9.21pm

Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm

^^^^^^

"The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood."

He's got that one correct.

Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm)

Sizeable proportion- can you define what you mean by this-over 50%? 10%?

Read the article, there are plenty more on the net, and make your own mind up Trotsky. Whatever I say will be incorrect in your mind.

Plus, another lefty not acknowledging the bigotry present in UAF. Why could that be?

I'm not denying their are some dodgy people affiliated with UAF. It was a simple question Matt, one I'm sure that you can answer. How many do you define as a sizable proportion?

Also, I think you need to read on economics and understand a bit more about that subject. Nighty night Trotsky.

Answer the very very simple question. What do you define as a sizeable proportion?

Read about economics.

You can think what you want. Don't make it right .though.

there you go then. You can't answer a simple question. Goodnight.

No. I refused to play your diversionary games.

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 10 Jul 14 10.50pm
Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.44pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.40pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.35pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.26pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.22pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.19pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.16pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.05pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.02pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 9.48pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 9.21pm Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm ^^^^^^ "The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood." He's got that one correct. Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm) Interesting that despite an article full of criticism about UAF, including the bigotry espoused by many of its members, you choose to stick your head in the sand and ignore this, instead making a jibe at vile nazis who cannot be taken seriously. You are a strange one. On the one hand claiming that a vote of UKIP is a vote for a legion of bigots taking over high political office in ten years time, whilst selectively ignoring the blatant bigotry practiced by a sizeable proportion of the members of a group you support. Sizeable proportion- can you define what you mean by this-over 50%? 10%? Read the article, there are plenty more on the net, and make your own mind up Trotsky. Whatever I say will be incorrect in your mind. Plus, another lefty not acknowledging the bigotry present in UAF. Why could that be? I'm not denying their are some dodgy people affiliated with UAF. It was a simple question Matt, one I'm sure that you can answer. How many do you define as a sizable proportion? As I said, make your mind up. I know what I think. However, that will be wrong in your mind and I am sick of your diversionary bulls*** when you don't like the questions being asked, which you are doing by asking this. Also, I think you need to read on economics and understand a bit more about that subject. Nighty night Trotsky. Answer the very very simple question. What do you define as a sizeable proportion? Read about economics. So you can't define what a sizable proportion is, even though you claim to know what you mean, you can't let everyone else know. My guess is that there are a few bad eggs in the UAF and that you are exagerating how many there actually are. You can think what you want. Don't make it right .though. there you go then. You can't answer a simple question. Goodnight. No. I refused to play your diversionary games. What diversionary games? I've said that there are some idiots in the UAF-I'm actually agreeing with you. I am merely interested in what your definition of a sizeable proportion is, in percentage terms, that is all. Nothing diversionary about that.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 10 Jul 14 10.50pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.44pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.40pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.35pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.26pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.19pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.16pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.05pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.02pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 9.48pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 9.21pm

Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm

^^^^^^

"The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood."

He's got that one correct.

Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm)

Sizeable proportion- can you define what you mean by this-over 50%? 10%?

Read the article, there are plenty more on the net, and make your own mind up Trotsky. Whatever I say will be incorrect in your mind.

Plus, another lefty not acknowledging the bigotry present in UAF. Why could that be?

I'm not denying their are some dodgy people affiliated with UAF. It was a simple question Matt, one I'm sure that you can answer. How many do you define as a sizable proportion?

Also, I think you need to read on economics and understand a bit more about that subject. Nighty night Trotsky.

Answer the very very simple question. What do you define as a sizeable proportion?

Read about economics.

You can think what you want. Don't make it right .though.

there you go then. You can't answer a simple question. Goodnight.

No. I refused to play your diversionary games.

What diversionary games? I've said that there are some idiots in the UAF-I'm actually agreeing with you.
I am merely interested in what your definition of a sizeable proportion is, in percentage terms, that is all. Nothing diversionary about that.

Alert a moderator to this post

bright&wright 10 Jul 14 11.06pm
Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.50pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.44pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.40pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.35pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.26pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.22pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.19pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.16pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.05pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.02pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 9.48pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 9.21pm Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm ^^^^^^ "The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood." He's got that one correct. Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm) Interesting that despite an article full of criticism about UAF, including the bigotry espoused by many of its members, you choose to stick your head in the sand and ignore this, instead making a jibe at vile nazis who cannot be taken seriously. You are a strange one. On the one hand claiming that a vote of UKIP is a vote for a legion of bigots taking over high political office in ten years time, whilst selectively ignoring the blatant bigotry practiced by a sizeable proportion of the members of a group you support. Sizeable proportion- can you define what you mean by this-over 50%? 10%? Read the article, there are plenty more on the net, and make your own mind up Trotsky. Whatever I say will be incorrect in your mind. Plus, another lefty not acknowledging the bigotry present in UAF. Why could that be? I'm not denying their are some dodgy people affiliated with UAF. It was a simple question Matt, one I'm sure that you can answer. How many do you define as a sizable proportion? As I said, make your mind up. I know what I think. However, that will be wrong in your mind and I am sick of your diversionary bulls*** when you don't like the questions being asked, which you are doing by asking this. Also, I think you need to read on economics and understand a bit more about that subject. Nighty night Trotsky. Answer the very very simple question. What do you define as a sizeable proportion? Read about economics. So you can't define what a sizable proportion is, even though you claim to know what you mean, you can't let everyone else know. My guess is that there are a few bad eggs in the UAF and that you are exagerating how many there actually are. You can think what you want. Don't make it right .though. there you go then. You can't answer a simple question. Goodnight. No. I refused to play your diversionary games. What diversionary games? I've said that there are some idiots in the UAF-I'm actually agreeing with you. I am merely interested in what your definition of a sizeable proportion is, in percentage terms, that is all. Nothing diversionary about that. 54 more than the EDL. Is that enough for you? 'We are going to make a little bit of history here’ Mr. J. Ertl.
Alert a moderator to this post

bright&wright

10 Jul 14 11.06pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.50pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.44pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.40pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.35pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.26pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.19pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.16pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.05pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.02pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 9.48pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 9.21pm

Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm

^^^^^^

"The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood."

He's got that one correct.

Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm)

Sizeable proportion- can you define what you mean by this-over 50%? 10%?

Read the article, there are plenty more on the net, and make your own mind up Trotsky. Whatever I say will be incorrect in your mind.

Plus, another lefty not acknowledging the bigotry present in UAF. Why could that be?

I'm not denying their are some dodgy people affiliated with UAF. It was a simple question Matt, one I'm sure that you can answer. How many do you define as a sizable proportion?

Also, I think you need to read on economics and understand a bit more about that subject. Nighty night Trotsky.

Answer the very very simple question. What do you define as a sizeable proportion?

Read about economics.

You can think what you want. Don't make it right .though.

there you go then. You can't answer a simple question. Goodnight.

No. I refused to play your diversionary games.

54 more than the EDL. Is that enough for you?

'We are going to make a little bit of history here’ Mr. J. Ertl.

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 10 Jul 14 11.13pm
Quote bright&wright at 10 Jul 2014 11.06pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.50pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.44pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.40pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.35pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.26pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.22pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.19pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.16pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.05pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.02pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 9.48pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 9.21pm Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm ^^^^^^ "The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood." He's got that one correct. Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm) Interesting that despite an article full of criticism about UAF, including the bigotry espoused by many of its members, you choose to stick your head in the sand and ignore this, instead making a jibe at vile nazis who cannot be taken seriously. You are a strange one. On the one hand claiming that a vote of UKIP is a vote for a legion of bigots taking over high political office in ten years time, whilst selectively ignoring the blatant bigotry practiced by a sizeable proportion of the members of a group you support. Sizeable proportion- can you define what you mean by this-over 50%? 10%? Read the article, there are plenty more on the net, and make your own mind up Trotsky. Whatever I say will be incorrect in your mind. Plus, another lefty not acknowledging the bigotry present in UAF. Why could that be? I'm not denying their are some dodgy people affiliated with UAF. It was a simple question Matt, one I'm sure that you can answer. How many do you define as a sizable proportion? As I said, make your mind up. I know what I think. However, that will be wrong in your mind and I am sick of your diversionary bulls*** when you don't like the questions being asked, which you are doing by asking this. Also, I think you need to read on economics and understand a bit more about that subject. Nighty night Trotsky. Answer the very very simple question. What do you define as a sizeable proportion? Read about economics. So you can't define what a sizable proportion is, even though you claim to know what you mean, you can't let everyone else know. My guess is that there are a few bad eggs in the UAF and that you are exagerating how many there actually are. You can think what you want. Don't make it right .though. there you go then. You can't answer a simple question. Goodnight. No. I refused to play your diversionary games. What diversionary games? I've said that there are some idiots in the UAF-I'm actually agreeing with you. I am merely interested in what your definition of a sizeable proportion is, in percentage terms, that is all. Nothing diversionary about that. 54 more than the EDL. Is that enough for you? so 154% then
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 10 Jul 14 11.13pm

Quote bright&wright at 10 Jul 2014 11.06pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.50pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.44pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.40pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.35pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.26pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.19pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.16pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.05pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.02pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 9.48pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 9.21pm

Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm

^^^^^^

"The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood."

He's got that one correct.

Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm)

Sizeable proportion- can you define what you mean by this-over 50%? 10%?

Read the article, there are plenty more on the net, and make your own mind up Trotsky. Whatever I say will be incorrect in your mind.

Plus, another lefty not acknowledging the bigotry present in UAF. Why could that be?

I'm not denying their are some dodgy people affiliated with UAF. It was a simple question Matt, one I'm sure that you can answer. How many do you define as a sizable proportion?

Also, I think you need to read on economics and understand a bit more about that subject. Nighty night Trotsky.

Answer the very very simple question. What do you define as a sizeable proportion?

Read about economics.

You can think what you want. Don't make it right .though.

there you go then. You can't answer a simple question. Goodnight.

No. I refused to play your diversionary games.

54 more than the EDL. Is that enough for you?

so 154% then

Alert a moderator to this post

ghosteagle 11 Jul 14 12.27pm
Quote bright&wright at 10 Jul 2014 11.06pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.50pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.44pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.40pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.35pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.26pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.22pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.19pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.16pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.05pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.02pm Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 9.48pm Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 9.21pm Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm ^^^^^^ "The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood." He's got that one correct. Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm) Interesting that despite an article full of criticism about UAF, including the bigotry espoused by many of its members, you choose to stick your head in the sand and ignore this, instead making a jibe at vile nazis who cannot be taken seriously. You are a strange one. On the one hand claiming that a vote of UKIP is a vote for a legion of bigots taking over high political office in ten years time, whilst selectively ignoring the blatant bigotry practiced by a sizeable proportion of the members of a group you support. Sizeable proportion- can you define what you mean by this-over 50%? 10%? Read the article, there are plenty more on the net, and make your own mind up Trotsky. Whatever I say will be incorrect in your mind. Plus, another lefty not acknowledging the bigotry present in UAF. Why could that be? I'm not denying their are some dodgy people affiliated with UAF. It was a simple question Matt, one I'm sure that you can answer. How many do you define as a sizable proportion? As I said, make your mind up. I know what I think. However, that will be wrong in your mind and I am sick of your diversionary bulls*** when you don't like the questions being asked, which you are doing by asking this. Also, I think you need to read on economics and understand a bit more about that subject. Nighty night Trotsky. Answer the very very simple question. What do you define as a sizeable proportion? Read about economics. So you can't define what a sizable proportion is, even though you claim to know what you mean, you can't let everyone else know. My guess is that there are a few bad eggs in the UAF and that you are exagerating how many there actually are. You can think what you want. Don't make it right .though. there you go then. You can't answer a simple question. Goodnight. No. I refused to play your diversionary games. What diversionary games? I've said that there are some idiots in the UAF-I'm actually agreeing with you. I am merely interested in what your definition of a sizeable proportion is, in percentage terms, that is all. Nothing diversionary about that. 54 more than the EDL. Is that enough for you? I was under the impression that the EDL and the UAF were both 100% full of idiots.
Alert a moderator to this post

ghosteagle

11 Jul 14 12.27pm

Quote bright&wright at 10 Jul 2014 11.06pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.50pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.44pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.40pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.35pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.26pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.19pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.16pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 10.05pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 10.02pm

Quote nickgusset at 10 Jul 2014 9.48pm

Quote matt_himself at 10 Jul 2014 9.21pm

Quote Kermit8 at 10 Jul 2014 9.06pm

^^^^^^

"The racist Right thrives on two things: publicity and the politics of victimhood."

He's got that one correct.

Edited by Kermit8 (10 Jul 2014 9.07pm)

Sizeable proportion- can you define what you mean by this-over 50%? 10%?

Read the article, there are plenty more on the net, and make your own mind up Trotsky. Whatever I say will be incorrect in your mind.

Plus, another lefty not acknowledging the bigotry present in UAF. Why could that be?

I'm not denying their are some dodgy people affiliated with UAF. It was a simple question Matt, one I'm sure that you can answer. How many do you define as a sizable proportion?

Also, I think you need to read on economics and understand a bit more about that subject. Nighty night Trotsky.

Answer the very very simple question. What do you define as a sizeable proportion?

Read about economics.

You can think what you want. Don't make it right .though.

there you go then. You can't answer a simple question. Goodnight.

No. I refused to play your diversionary games.

54 more than the EDL. Is that enough for you?

I was under the impression that the EDL and the UAF were both 100% full of idiots.

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 18 Mar 15 11.14pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 16 Jun 2014 9.42pm Did you see many Islamic people complaining about the schools in Birmingham? I'm sure there are some but their are pretty quiet to me. There's a lot more than meets the eye to the Trojan horse affair - enough to warrant its own thread. All sides are in some respect culpable. [Link] MPs have criticised Ofsted and the government over a "worrying lack of coordination" between five overlapping official inquiries into the so-called Trojan Horse affair. It was alleged last year extremists had tried to take over several schools in Birmingham to advance radical interpretations of Islam. A series of official investigations found the claims to be groundless. Edited by nickgusset (18 Mar 2015 11.16pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 18 Mar 15 11.14pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 16 Jun 2014 9.42pm

Did you see many Islamic people complaining about the schools in Birmingham? I'm sure there are some but their are pretty quiet to me.

There's a lot more than meets the eye to the Trojan horse affair - enough to warrant its own thread. All sides are in some respect culpable.

[Link]

MPs have criticised Ofsted and the government over a "worrying lack of coordination" between five overlapping official inquiries into the so-called Trojan Horse affair.

It was alleged last year extremists had tried to take over several schools in Birmingham to advance radical interpretations of Islam.

A series of official investigations found the claims to be groundless.

Edited by nickgusset (18 Mar 2015 11.16pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

Seth On a pale blue dot 19 Mar 15 1.51am
Quote nickgusset at 18 Mar 2015 11.14pm [Link] MPs have criticised Ofsted and the government over a "worrying lack of coordination" between five overlapping official inquiries into the so-called Trojan Horse affair. It was alleged last year extremists had tried to take over several schools in Birmingham to advance radical interpretations of Islam. A series of official investigations found the claims to be groundless. So the whole "Trojan horse" thing was just a load of bollocks? Amazing. I wonder whose agenda was served by those sensationalist headlines? Edited by Seth (19 Mar 2015 1.51am) "You can feel the stadium jumping. The stadium is actually physically moving up and down" FA Cup MOTD 24/4/16
Alert a moderator to this post

Seth

On a pale blue dot 19 Mar 15 1.51am

Quote nickgusset at 18 Mar 2015 11.14pm

[Link]

MPs have criticised Ofsted and the government over a "worrying lack of coordination" between five overlapping official inquiries into the so-called Trojan Horse affair.

It was alleged last year extremists had tried to take over several schools in Birmingham to advance radical interpretations of Islam.

A series of official investigations found the claims to be groundless.

So the whole "Trojan horse" thing was just a load of bollocks? Amazing. I wonder whose agenda was served by those sensationalist headlines?

Edited by Seth (19 Mar 2015 1.51am)

"You can feel the stadium jumping. The stadium is actually physically moving up and down"
FA Cup MOTD 24/4/16

Alert a moderator to this post

johnfirewall 19 Mar 15 8.50am
A lot of crimes were investigated in the 70s but thanks to Thatcher you say, these were let slide. Then there was Rotherham where the authorities were scared to point out the pattern of offenders being from a particular group. I'm making no conection to these type of offences and religion but what I'm saying is for similar reasons as in my 2 examples it may have been a convenient result of the investigations. Although my evaluation would be that if there were that many separate investigations the schools probably had time to throw the offending books out.
Alert a moderator to this post

johnfirewall

19 Mar 15 8.50am

A lot of crimes were investigated in the 70s but thanks to Thatcher you say, these were let slide.

Then there was Rotherham where the authorities were scared to point out the pattern of offenders being from a particular group.

I'm making no conection to these type of offences and religion but what I'm saying is for similar reasons as in my 2 examples it may have been a convenient result of the investigations.

Although my evaluation would be that if there were that many separate investigations the schools probably had time to throw the offending books out.

Alert a moderator to this post

ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 19 Mar 15 11.03am
If there were no radical thoughts or people in the world would it be a better place - some kind of Utopia, or a blander place - some kind of Hounslow? Red and Blue Army!
Alert a moderator to this post

ASCPFC

Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 19 Mar 15 11.03am

If there were no radical thoughts or people in the world would it be a better place - some kind of Utopia, or a blander place - some kind of Hounslow?

Red and Blue Army!

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 34 of 41 < 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Is Islam, the new Nazi ?

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors