This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Invalid user 2019 16 Jul 19 2.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by sitdownstandup
Whetever people get their information from its difficult to believe its going to be completely unbiased. Writers and readers have their own prejudices and readers generally tend to read writers who support their own views and beliefs. Im sure you realise that anyway. You're right. Everyone has a different paymaster, even these Youtube personalities. There is always a target audience and it isn't usually 'freethinkers'. Bills to pay. A brand to build. Stuff you suddenly realise you shouldn't say or emphasise because it might offend your core audience. And so on.. Everything with mass of even growing appeal, ends up being something of a by numbers caricature of what it professes to actually be.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 16 Jul 19 2.15pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by sitdownstandup
Whetever people get their information from its difficult to believe its going to be completely unbiased. Writers and readers have their own prejudices and readers generally tend to read writers who support their own views and beliefs. Im sure you realise that anyway.
That is unless they are religious.....then all that stuff is sort of decided for them depending upon how literal they wish to take it. But for those who aren't religious missing objective truth as a guiding light means each individual needs to deal with positioning themselves on morality questions....Finding where they exist on a spectrum for life's difficult questions. Well, those of us who care to consider moral questions that is..... as we know a fair number of people just swan through life without thinking about much at all. Anyway the morality positions we take and what we consider important will have a direct affect and bias how we interpret information. I don't think there is a way around that.....there are 'facts' or 'statistics' and then there is interpretations of facts to fit an individual's worldview. So really it's a battle of worldviews and what is realistic.
Edited by Stirlingsays (16 Jul 2019 2.30pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 16 Jul 19 2.19pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dollardays
No, but if I ran out of bog roll I'd gladly take a copy
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 16 Jul 19 6.59pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by johnno42000
Yes he was a republican but he wasn't the only one to own slaves. This person has tracked down some republicans who owned slaves [Tweet Link]
It is daft to think there were no republicans who owned slaves just as much as saying that every democrat owned slaves. Did they still own them after election to the Republican party and where did I say all dems had slaves. Yet all these people still vote Democrat.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
johnno42000 17 Jul 19 12.38am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
Did they still own them after election to the Republican party and where did I say all dems had slaves. Yet all these people still vote Democrat. I didn't say you did. What I said was that saying no republicans had slaves is as daft as saying all democrats owned slaves. Both are untrue.
'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more' |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Invalid user 2019 17 Jul 19 1.14am | |
---|---|
I think it shows how badly Trump's comments came across that we need to journey through the annals of time to move the topic on. Trump would've never told a white American congresswoman holding the exact same views with ancestors from elsewhere to "go back to" their country. The comments were clearly racist. Intentionally so. A calculated gamble and no doubt part of his 2020 re-election strategy. Whereas the democrats reel off the myriad of races they hope will vote for them in numbers, Trump's strategy has always been to make non white Americans appear 'foreign' when needed. See birtherism.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 17 Jul 19 5.38am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by johnno42000
I didn't say you did. What I said was that saying no republicans had slaves is as daft as saying all democrats owned slaves. Both are untrue. I stand corrected (for now) but going forwards that one thing doesnt change what I wrote about Democrats.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 17 Jul 19 5.41am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dollardays
I think it shows how badly Trump's comments came across that we need to journey through the annals of time to move the topic on. Trump would've never told a white American congresswoman holding the exact same views with ancestors from elsewhere to "go back to" their country. The comments were clearly racist. Intentionally so. A calculated gamble and no doubt part of his 2020 re-election strategy. Whereas the democrats reel off the myriad of races they hope will vote for them in numbers, Trump's strategy has always been to make non white Americans appear 'foreign' when needed. See birtherism.
I think he would if she pissed over the flag; which is an analogy of what these women did.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 17 Jul 19 8.08am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
I think he would if she pissed over the flag; which is an analogy of what these women did. You think he’d tell a white woman to go back where they’re from? Of course he f***ing wouldn’t. Who do you think knows more about facing adversity and working hard to change it; a white male born into millions or a female born into a working class immigrant family?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 17 Jul 19 8.21am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
You think he’d tell a white woman to go back where they’re from? Of course he f***ing wouldn’t. Who do you think knows more about facing adversity and working hard to change it; a white male born into millions or a female born into a working class immigrant family? White people do come from other countries other than the UK and the us.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 17 Jul 19 8.22am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
You think he’d tell a white woman to go back where they’re from? Of course he f***ing wouldn’t. Who do you think knows more about facing adversity and working hard to change it; a white male born into millions or a female born into a working class immigrant family? White guilt trip then.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 17 Jul 19 8.34am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by W12
I do appreciate you taking the time to answer and this seems honest but it really is exactly how i would expect you would answer. It's mainstream media and people that entirely support that narrative. All of those politicians and celebrities you mentioned propose the same globalist and EU centric, eco friendly "if everyone would just be nice we can solve everyone", feminism friendly, self flagellating worldview which you are trapped in. To top it all you are also relying on the hyperbole and disinformation from Twitter. Do yourself a favour and start with Tim Pool (Youtube and podcasts) for honest and non-partisan commentary and the actual journalism that we are missing. He's a centrist by any reasonable measure and further left than myself but you may learn something that will open your eyes. Even if you don't agree I suspect you might learn to realize that journalism from the mainstream is now almost dead once you are again exposed to the real thing. At least I can say I tried. I was similar to you only a couple of years ago by the way. You asked where I got my information and who I trusted. I don't really trust any broadcast media which doesn't have any editorial control and just allows an individual to pontificate without being challenged. There's plenty available. You have found one you like but if I went that route I would have to use many. I do use web forums of every stripe. I am a member, for instance, of several Trump groups who either support him or loath him. I have been banned from several too for daring to criticise him. These forums give plenty of insight into the way others think and why but they also allow those views to be challenged and dissected. I belong to groups that want to remain in the EU and some that wish to leave come what may. So I don't agree that my use of the MSM means my information gathering is flawed at all. In fact I believe the attacks from the right both here and in the USA by Trump with his "enemy of the people" comments about the MSM to be really dangerous. Seeking to undermine our confidence in the MSM and threatening the freedom of the press are first steps towards state thought control and dictatorship. That to me is the biggest danger here. It appears it might have already worked with you. So I balance your encouragement to watch alternative sources with my own to reject this undermining of the free press, where there are lawyers and editors fact checking before publication. You can straighten the spin with your own intelligence, so long as you know what is reported hasn't just been invented.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.