BBC (again)

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

BBC (again)

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 334 of 435 < 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 >

Teddy Eagle 04 Oct 23 10.13pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle From a right wing tabloid making the same unsubstantiated assertions about Biden and the motivation for the Trump indictments that all the right in the USA do? The only thing interesting in that is that they acknowledge Trump could be a crook. I have always said that if evidence of corruption involving Joe Biden emerges then he should face exactly the same treatment as Trump. Right now it has not. The point is that they could both be crooks which is a poor prospect for American voters. A narcissistic liar or a doddering cardboard cutout are not great choices without their being criminals as well. Still awaiting your list of approved news outlets.
Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle

04 Oct 23 10.13pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

From a right wing tabloid making the same unsubstantiated assertions about Biden and the motivation for the Trump indictments that all the right in the USA do?

The only thing interesting in that is that they acknowledge Trump could be a crook.

I have always said that if evidence of corruption involving Joe Biden emerges then he should face exactly the same treatment as Trump. Right now it has not.

The point is that they could both be crooks which is a poor prospect for American voters. A narcissistic liar or a doddering cardboard cutout are not great choices without their being criminals as well.
Still awaiting your list of approved news outlets.

Alert a moderator to this post

NE14T 04 Oct 23 10.19pm
Jeepers Wisbech this is getting painful. My main point which relates to the subject matter of this thread is simple. ALL the unsubstantiated allegations against Trump are covered day in day out by the BBC accompanied by the worst pics of him they can find. None or very few of the unsubstantiated allegations against Biden are covered by the BBC and if they are, they are scant and buried somewhere on page 14. It doesn’t take a clever guy to realise their is no balance or fairness with the BBC editorial team. The problem is their hatred of Trump (who admittedly is a tool) is affecting their ability to report on an even bigger crook Biden. That ain’t right. Let’s leave it there. The beatings will stop when morale improves.
Alert a moderator to this post

NE14T

04 Oct 23 10.19pm

Jeepers Wisbech this is getting painful.

My main point which relates to the subject matter of this thread is simple.

ALL the unsubstantiated allegations against Trump are covered day in day out by the BBC accompanied by the worst pics of him they can find.

None or very few of the unsubstantiated allegations against Biden are covered by the BBC and if they are, they are scant and buried somewhere on page 14.

It doesn’t take a clever guy to realise their is no balance or fairness with the BBC editorial team.

The problem is their hatred of Trump (who admittedly is a tool) is affecting their ability to report on an even bigger crook Biden. That ain’t right.

Let’s leave it there.

The beatings will stop when morale improves.

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 04 Oct 23 10.45pm
Originally posted by NE14T Jeepers Wisbech this is getting painful. My main point which relates to the subject matter of this thread is simple. ALL the unsubstantiated allegations against Trump are covered day in day out by the BBC accompanied by the worst pics of him they can find. None or very few of the unsubstantiated allegations against Biden are covered by the BBC and if they are, they are scant and buried somewhere on page 14. It doesn’t take a clever guy to realise their is no balance or fairness with the BBC editorial team. The problem is their hatred of Trump (who admittedly is a tool) is affecting their ability to report on an even bigger crook Biden. That ain’t right. Let’s leave it there. Trump has been indicted. Several times. Biden has not. Not once. Unless and until either is found guilty neither can be called a crook. Trump is much closer though than Biden. Even if every assertion being levelled at Biden and Trump proved to be true, which seems extremely unlikely, there is no doubt at all whose criminality would receive the greatest punishment. It’s not Biden. The BBC are giving entirely appropriate coverage. Indictments of a former President running again is serious news. Political smearing and innuendo is tittle tattle suitable for the tabloids but not the BBC. Should it be elevated to indictment then you would see a change. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 04 Oct 23 10.45pm

Originally posted by NE14T

Jeepers Wisbech this is getting painful.

My main point which relates to the subject matter of this thread is simple.

ALL the unsubstantiated allegations against Trump are covered day in day out by the BBC accompanied by the worst pics of him they can find.

None or very few of the unsubstantiated allegations against Biden are covered by the BBC and if they are, they are scant and buried somewhere on page 14.

It doesn’t take a clever guy to realise their is no balance or fairness with the BBC editorial team.

The problem is their hatred of Trump (who admittedly is a tool) is affecting their ability to report on an even bigger crook Biden. That ain’t right.

Let’s leave it there.

Trump has been indicted. Several times. Biden has not. Not once.

Unless and until either is found guilty neither can be called a crook. Trump is much closer though than Biden.

Even if every assertion being levelled at Biden and Trump proved to be true, which seems extremely unlikely, there is no doubt at all whose criminality would receive the greatest punishment. It’s not Biden.

The BBC are giving entirely appropriate coverage. Indictments of a former President running again is serious news. Political smearing and innuendo is tittle tattle suitable for the tabloids but not the BBC. Should it be elevated to indictment then you would see a change.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 04 Oct 23 10.53pm
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle The point is that they could both be crooks which is a poor prospect for American voters. A narcissistic liar or a doddering cardboard cutout are not great choices without their being criminals as well. Still awaiting your list of approved news outlets. That though isn’t the point is it? The point is that the piece you referenced just makes the same old assertions. Anyone could be a crook. No one is until convicted. No one has yet. Trump is though much closer than Biden. You are as entitled to your opinion as anyone else as to their respective characters. I am not especially enamoured by Biden either but compared to Trump he is a Saint. In my opinion. I don’t approve news outlets. I read them. Some with greater trust than others. Some with significant scepticism. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 04 Oct 23 10.53pm

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

That though isn’t the point is it?

The point is that the piece you referenced just makes the same old assertions.

Anyone could be a crook. No one is until convicted. No one has yet. Trump is though much closer than Biden.

You are as entitled to your opinion as anyone else as to their respective characters. I am not especially enamoured by Biden either but compared to Trump he is a Saint. In my opinion.

I don’t approve news outlets. I read them. Some with greater trust than others. Some with significant scepticism.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle 04 Oct 23 11.12pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle That though isn’t the point is it? The point is that the piece you referenced just makes the same old assertions. Anyone could be a crook. No one is until convicted. No one has yet. Trump is though much closer than Biden. You are as entitled to your opinion as anyone else as to their respective characters. I am not especially enamoured by Biden either but compared to Trump he is a Saint. In my opinion. I don’t approve news outlets. I read them. Some with greater trust than others. Some with significant scepticism. And dismiss them out of hand regardless of the content. If the only qualification to be leader of the free world is not being Donald Trump there are millions of candidates who could do a better job whilst forming cogent sentences, not falling over or having crackhead influence selling sons.
Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle

04 Oct 23 11.12pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

That though isn’t the point is it?

The point is that the piece you referenced just makes the same old assertions.

Anyone could be a crook. No one is until convicted. No one has yet. Trump is though much closer than Biden.

You are as entitled to your opinion as anyone else as to their respective characters. I am not especially enamoured by Biden either but compared to Trump he is a Saint. In my opinion.

I don’t approve news outlets. I read them. Some with greater trust than others. Some with significant scepticism.

And dismiss them out of hand regardless of the content.
If the only qualification to be leader of the free world is not being Donald Trump there are millions of candidates who could do a better job whilst forming cogent sentences, not falling over or having crackhead influence selling sons.

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 05 Oct 23 7.48am
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle And dismiss them out of hand regardless of the content. If the only qualification to be leader of the free world is not being Donald Trump there are millions of candidates who could do a better job whilst forming cogent sentences, not falling over or having crackhead influence selling sons. They aren’t dismissed out of hand! They are given entirely appropriate coverage. Who suggested the only qualification is not to be Trump? That almost anyone else would be preferable to him isn’t the same thing. Biden should not, and I believe will not, stand again. Not because he isn’t a great public speaker or that he has a troubled son, but because he did his job in 2020 and it’s now time for a new direction that can try to heal the divide. I predict he will announce his withdrawal in the Spring citing that whilst the assertions against him have no merit they are a distraction that no Presidential candidate should contemplate being allowed to cloud the electorate’s judgement. Furthermore, if assertions justify withdrawal how much more so do a raft of actual indictments? For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 05 Oct 23 7.48am

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

They aren’t dismissed out of hand! They are given entirely appropriate coverage.

Who suggested the only qualification is not to be Trump? That almost anyone else would be preferable to him isn’t the same thing.

Biden should not, and I believe will not, stand again. Not because he isn’t a great public speaker or that he has a troubled son, but because he did his job in 2020 and it’s now time for a new direction that can try to heal the divide.

I predict he will announce his withdrawal in the Spring citing that whilst the assertions against him have no merit they are a distraction that no Presidential candidate should contemplate being allowed to cloud the electorate’s judgement. Furthermore, if assertions justify withdrawal how much more so do a raft of actual indictments?

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle 05 Oct 23 9.04am
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle They aren’t dismissed out of hand! They are given entirely appropriate coverage. Who suggested the only qualification is not to be Trump? That almost anyone else would be preferable to him isn’t the same thing. Biden should not, and I believe will not, stand again. Not because he isn’t a great public speaker or that he has a troubled son, but because he did his job in 2020 and it’s now time for a new direction that can try to heal the divide. I predict he will announce his withdrawal in the Spring citing that whilst the assertions against him have no merit they are a distraction that no Presidential candidate should contemplate being allowed to cloud the electorate’s judgement. Furthermore, if assertions justify withdrawal how much more so do a raft of actual indictments? Links are dismissed as biased reporting most of the time and Biden is regularly defended on here on the grounds that Trump would be worse. Maybe an answer for America is that they need a viable third party.
Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle

05 Oct 23 9.04am

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

They aren’t dismissed out of hand! They are given entirely appropriate coverage.

Who suggested the only qualification is not to be Trump? That almost anyone else would be preferable to him isn’t the same thing.

Links are dismissed as biased reporting most of the time and Biden is regularly defended on here on the grounds that Trump would be worse.
Maybe an answer for America is that they need a viable third party.

Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst The garden of England 05 Oct 23 9.53am
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle They aren’t dismissed out of hand! They are given entirely appropriate coverage. Who suggested the only qualification is not to be Trump? That almost anyone else would be preferable to him isn’t the same thing. Biden should not, and I believe will not, stand again. Not because he isn’t a great public speaker or that he has a troubled son, but because he did his job in 2020 and it’s now time for a new direction that can try to heal the divide. I predict he will announce his withdrawal in the Spring citing that whilst the assertions against him have no merit they are a distraction that no Presidential candidate should contemplate being allowed to cloud the electorate’s judgement. Furthermore, if assertions justify withdrawal how much more so do a raft of actual indictments? And what was his ‘job’ in 2020 then. Anyone but trump ?
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 05 Oct 23 9.53am

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

They aren’t dismissed out of hand! They are given entirely appropriate coverage.

Who suggested the only qualification is not to be Trump? That almost anyone else would be preferable to him isn’t the same thing.

And what was his ‘job’ in 2020 then. Anyone but trump ?

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 05 Oct 23 10.13am
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle Trump has been indicted. Several times. Biden has not. Not once. Unless and until either is found guilty neither can be called a crook. Trump is much closer though than Biden. Even if every assertion being levelled at Biden and Trump proved to be true, which seems extremely unlikely, there is no doubt at all whose criminality would receive the greatest punishment. It’s not Biden. The BBC are giving entirely appropriate coverage. Indictments of a former President running again is serious news. Political smearing and innuendo is tittle tattle suitable for the tabloids but not the BBC. Should it be elevated to indictment then you would see a change. Are you pretending that Trump isn't being stitched up? A judge whose self pronounced ambition is to get Trump? Give it a rest man.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

05 Oct 23 10.13am

Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Trump has been indicted. Several times. Biden has not. Not once.

Unless and until either is found guilty neither can be called a crook. Trump is much closer though than Biden.

Are you pretending that Trump isn't being stitched up?

A judge whose self pronounced ambition is to get Trump?

Give it a rest man.

Alert a moderator to this post

Glazier#1 05 Oct 23 12.04pm
Originally posted by NE14T Jeepers Wisbech this is getting painful. My main point which relates to the subject matter of this thread is simple. ALL the unsubstantiated allegations against Trump are covered day in day out by the BBC accompanied by the worst pics of him they can find. None or very few of the unsubstantiated allegations against Biden are covered by the BBC and if they are, they are scant and buried somewhere on page 14. It doesn’t take a clever guy to realise their is no balance or fairness with the BBC editorial team. The problem is their hatred of Trump (who admittedly is a tool) is affecting their ability to report on an even bigger crook Biden. That ain’t right. Let’s leave it there. Are there any good ones to be found.?!?!? If so, find one and post the link here. Then we can all judge.
Alert a moderator to this post

Glazier#1

05 Oct 23 12.04pm

Originally posted by NE14T

Jeepers Wisbech this is getting painful.

My main point which relates to the subject matter of this thread is simple.

ALL the unsubstantiated allegations against Trump are covered day in day out by the BBC accompanied by the worst pics of him they can find.

None or very few of the unsubstantiated allegations against Biden are covered by the BBC and if they are, they are scant and buried somewhere on page 14.

It doesn’t take a clever guy to realise their is no balance or fairness with the BBC editorial team.

The problem is their hatred of Trump (who admittedly is a tool) is affecting their ability to report on an even bigger crook Biden. That ain’t right.

Let’s leave it there.

Are there any good ones to be found.?!?!? If so, find one and post the link here. Then we can all judge.

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 05 Oct 23 12.46pm
Originally posted by Glazier#1 Are there any good ones to be found.?!?!? If so, find one and post the link here. Then we can all judge. Bit of a pervy request but here you go. [Link] [Link] 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

05 Oct 23 12.46pm

Originally posted by Glazier#1

Are there any good ones to be found.?!?!? If so, find one and post the link here. Then we can all judge.

Bit of a pervy request but here you go.

[Link]

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Glazier#1 05 Oct 23 1.34pm
Originally posted by Stirlingsays Bit of a pervy request but here you go. [Link] [Link] HAHAHAHa! Brilliant! The bronzed, blond Adonis! I could see both of those on the BBC News website. Or my bedroom wall. Haha! That's really cheered me up.
Alert a moderator to this post

Glazier#1

05 Oct 23 1.34pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Bit of a pervy request but here you go.

[Link]

HAHAHAHa!

Brilliant!

The bronzed, blond Adonis!

I could see both of those on the BBC News website.

Or my bedroom wall.

Haha! That's really cheered me up.