This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 20 Apr 17 3.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
He's right though isn't he. Lefty loons never change their spots. No he isn't.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 20 Apr 17 3.46pm | |
---|---|
No but i think others may be.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 20 Apr 17 3.52pm | |
---|---|
Under the 'Microscope' of an intense 'General Election' campaign, the electorate will see Corbyn for what he really is. He 'Leads' a Labour party that is totaly divided and dominated by extremists whose risible policies and views will be unpalatable to the electorate once the 'Spotlight' has been shined on them during the campaign. Labour are facing a total wipe-out at the election with the resultant effect that the moderates in their ranks could reclaim their party. I could really 'Go to town' about Corbyn and his party but I shall leave it at this. Edited by Willo (20 Apr 2017 3.55pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 20 Apr 17 4.13pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
No but i think others may be. Fair point. Maybe you should stop posting till after June 8th to give us all a rest.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 20 Apr 17 4.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
Under the 'Microscope' of an intense 'General Election' campaign, the electorate will see Corbyn for what he really is. He 'Leads' a Labour party that is totaly divided and dominated by extremists whose views will be unpalatable to the electorate once the 'Spotlight' has been shined on them during the campaign. Labour are facing a total wipe-out at the election with the resultant effect that the moderates in their ranks could reclaim their party. For someone who is resolutely a Conservative, you seem to be like many on here who aren't ever going to vote labour, to seem very concerned about the Labour Leadership. Granted, its certainly looking bad for the Labour Party, but its not because of their Leader - Who was elected lawfully, within the rules of the party, by a democratic majority. The problem that Labour has with 'infighting and divsion' isn't really to do with Corbyn, its about the Parliamentery Labour party refusing to accept the leader elected by the membership.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
hedgehog50 Croydon 20 Apr 17 4.22pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
For someone who is resolutely a Conservative, you seem to be like many on here who aren't ever going to vote labour, to seem very concerned about the Labour Leadership. Granted, its certainly looking bad for the Labour Party, but its not because of their Leader - Who was elected lawfully, within the rules of the party, by a democratic majority. The problem that Labour has with 'infighting and divsion' isn't really to do with Corbyn, its about the Parliamentery Labour party refusing to accept the leader elected by the membership. No, the problem with the current Labour leadership and their policies is that the electorate does not want to be subject to a communist-lite regime. Simple as that, and they will vote conservative and liberal in their droves to prove it.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 20 Apr 17 4.26pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
For someone who is resolutely a Conservative, you seem to be like many on here who aren't ever going to vote labour, to seem very concerned about the Labour Leadership. Granted, its certainly looking bad for the Labour Party, but its not because of their Leader - Who was elected lawfully, within the rules of the party, by a democratic majority. The problem that Labour has with 'infighting and divsion' isn't really to do with Corbyn, its about the Parliamentery Labour party refusing to accept the leader elected by the membership. Concerned ? You are having a laugh. As for being elected by a democratic majority - he was elected by extremists are who are in the grip of sheer delusion that the electorate will vote for their madcap policies.At the end of the day, Labour is never going to provide an effective opposition to the Conservatives with Jeremy Corbyn at the helm. No more from me about Corbyn ! Edited by Willo (20 Apr 2017 4.30pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 20 Apr 17 4.47pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
Concerned ? You are having a laugh. As for being elected by a democratic majority - he was elected by extremists are who are in the grip of sheer delusion that the electorate will vote for their madcap policies.At the end of the day, Labour is never going to provide an effective opposition to the Conservatives with Jeremy Corbyn at the helm. No more from me about Corbyn ! Edited by Willo (20 Apr 2017 4.30pm) No more from me about Corbyn ! Except for the preceding paragraph about Corbyn. Still we will hold you to that thank you.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 20 Apr 17 4.51pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
No more from me about Corbyn ! Except for the preceding paragraph about Corbyn. Still we will hold you to that thank you. Yes - "Preceding paragraph" - which preceded my assertion that I wasn't going to post anything more on on this thread about him.And I will keep to my word. Edited by Willo (20 Apr 2017 4.51pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 20 Apr 17 4.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Are you for real? Corbyn is not fit to adjust her suspenders as a politician. He makes Michael Foot look like Churchill. IMO Michael Foot was a very able man who had the misfortune to look like a beatnik. Churchill was a very poor PM after the war and younger leaders had to wait too long as he dragged it out.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 20 Apr 17 4.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
Yes - "Preceding paragraph" - which preceded my assertion that I wasn't going to post anything more on on this thread about him.And I will keep to my word. .................................................
Edited by legaleagle (20 Apr 2017 4.59pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 20 Apr 17 5.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
IMO Michael Foot was a very able man who had the misfortune to look like a beatnik. Churchill was a very poor PM after the war and younger leaders had to wait too long as he dragged it out. Not to mention his record before WW2 such asthe fiasco at Gallipoli...(though he was a great war leader 1940-45,and a visionary about Europe and the desirability of a Europe-wide human rights convention)standards. ) Michael Foot (though not a political party leader for the modern age) had IMHO more decency in his little finger than May, Farage,Johnson,Osborne and Michael Gove put together..
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.