I don't defend those who fail to support those trying to educate their children effectively. There is a huge difference between teaching youngsters in a careful, caring and thoughtful way about diversity in society, so they are equipped to handle today's world in a better, more informed, way than their parents, and bringing "sexuality into the lives of little children".

That you even describe it like that shows just how prejudiced and ignorant some people are. Your words truly show everyone who you are.

That you threaten to respond with fists, and not with reason, is yet more evidence of that. Those who do so prove their arguments are empty and meaningless.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

With respect, I think you need to see it in the context of what is happening in the USA. Taken on its own, what you say above is probably true, but put in that context it isn't.

Do listen to the BBC podcast on this subject I have referenced in previous comments. It will explain a lot.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Reinforces that...
The word "groomer" is categorically an anti-LGBTQ hate word. It's super homophobic/Transphobic.

And that addresses a valid concern?

These people are super obvious, and they hide behind claims of oppression to frighten people away from looking. Claim they are against these terrible crimes yet attack those who highlight them.

Interestingly it is the same tactic that activists used against those concerned about grooming gangs.....accuse them of racism and hatred.... frighten them that making noise and highlighting what was happening could see them losing their jobs. Those within our institutions and out at all levels are a part of what happened. These crimes continued for decades before greater public exposure. Those who exposed them being the mainstream did were insulted and ignored.

There is still no justice for what happened and what continues to happen to this day.

Look at what Corbyn's Labour did to Sarah Champion even after the scandal broke, they pushed her out of the Shadow cabinet and all she did was say what actually happened.

Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Nov 2022 8.13am)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

When did the education of children become a terrible crime?

Teaching children well will enable them to identify those trying to exploit them and lessen risks.

People like you want to leave them in the dark, fearful of everyone and aware of nothing.

Edited by Wisbech Eagle (24 Nov 2022 9.17am)

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Exactly. There are two points here:

1. The articulation of "Alignment of the word 'groomer' with homosexuals is..." is not very hard. The statement does not do this, it looks to quite clearly be stating "you can't call anyone/use the word groomer and if you do, it's a hate crime". A 'groomer' being a paedophile targeting children for sexual exploitation. It's seeking to remove the usage of a word employed to identify such peoples.

2. The individual making this statement and his association with pro-paedophile activity and campaigning.

A poignant conclusion is quite easily drawn from this and the point of ridiculing and damning those seeking to align non-heterosexuals with paedophilia is quite easily made. The statement does not do this, from a supposed public figure whose job revolves around the necessity for such clarity and articulation.

Edited by Nicholas91 (24 Nov 2022 10.58am)

Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!