[Link]

Seriously

Red and Blue Army!

Apparently official figures on how many Trans people there are have been inflated.

[Link]

As usual the journalist don't bother to as the simple and obvious question.

These figures come from the census but why is the ONS using these numbers?

My understanding is that you have to obtain a Gender Recognition Certificate before the government will recognise you as a Trans so shouldn't the number of certificates be the source for their data.

Obviously there will be people who are going through the process so wouldn't be counted but as these are official numbers and the government / courts use them that should be the correct data source rather than a tick box on a census.

I once declared my nationality to be Klingon I kid you not it was the census where English as a nationality wasn't offered so in a pique I refused to add English under Other but put Klingon instead.

Edited by Badger11 (25 Apr 2023 7.46am)

One more point

Female to male would required a bi-lateral mastectomy, full hysterectomy (including ovaries) oestrogen suppression medication and testosterone pills.

Male to female requires removal of genitalia, cutting an opening for a 'v*****' lined with penile tissue and re-working of 'plumbing' pipework accordingly. The rest is done with drugs: oestrogen intake and testosterone suppression.
Later stages can include 'shaving' from Adam's apple to reduce it's prominence and shortening of vocal cords to raise pitch.

A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers

The question for me is what is driving this entire lunacy? Because this is totally top down. Imposed on us rather than representing any grassroots desire.

Perhaps it is me just being me but my understanding of realpolitik is that everything that happens does for a reason. An advantage. And this translunacy has to fit into that.

There is no electoral advantage. If anything it ultimately damages political parties who champion it (see what is happening to the likes of the SNP).

But it still gets promoted across the mainstream political system. No matter who is in power, this s*** has taken hold. Only just recently William Hague went on record and said an institution such as the Women's Institute had to just accept Transwomen as members by way of progress. Why is this 'progress' just unquestionable?

The powers that be must be gaining something tangible from it. The simple law of politics. A completely artificial, in every sense of the word, concept somehow foisted on us in the West (and interestingly, predominantly in the Anglo-West).

For me, the only conclusion I can arrive at is that if it is not a vote winner then it must mean they are gaining something else. And that can ony come from what the terrible physical consequences of this are, primarily on women (who get slated the most for objecting to this).

And for what?

I can only strip this back to some kind of desire to effectively sterilise young girls and have access to what were their reproductive organs.

Utterly terrifying. Literal evil in every sense of the word.

"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

At this stage anything is possible (although hats off for that!).

My own second, second, second guess is that it might actually be more about the eternal quest for people who crave power. And I mean REAL power. Not the common or garden fame and fortune kind but the real 1% of the 1% kind. People like Blair are a good example of what I mean.

And for them, it's all about cheating death. The ultimate expression of the Faustian spirit. The only logical conclusion of the Nietzschean 'will to power' drive.

But I concede, in the realms of utter silver foil hat wearing, into the realms of balaclava donnning.

"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

I get all of that but just consider this...

The number of children, in particular, being referred to the Tavistock and Portman Foundation Trust’s gender identity development service (Gids)—the NHS service through which all UK candidates for a sex change under 18 are funnelled—is up from 77 in 2009 to 2,590 in 2018-9. But what’s almost as dramatic as the headline numbers are developments in who is transitioning. In November 2017, the Guardian reported that 70 per cent of referrals were female. This was a surprising statistic because only 10 years previously the overall ratio had been more like 75 per cent males seeking to be female, and indeed it is still the gender traffic in that direction that dominates the increasingly noisy, divisive and panic-inflected debate.

Ponder on those numbers. And the dynamics. Something is SERIOUSLY f***ed up about this. Throw in the attacks, in every way conceivable, on any woman who dares object (and they get far, far more viciously slated about this than men, posing enough of a question on its own).

As I constantly state, willing to accept every kind of slur going when it comes to what I have written about as my own take on the reasoning but even if people take the stance of writing me off as a fruit loop, the actual data is surely cause for massive concern on its own?

"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.