Tweeting?
Pah!
He got 81 million votes from just squatting in his basement.

I suppose that response at least has the merit of being consistent.

You are as consistently wrong in just about everything you claim as you are with this.

Those who routinely spread conspiracy theories, as you do, are often in denial and believe they, and their fellow travellers, are the only ones with their eyes and minds open. They are also consistently wrong.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

I don't think that is in any way true. All decent people, whatever their personal political viewpoints, fight the sexual exploitation of children.

What is though true is that it is only the right who exploit the perception of sexual exploitation of children, by seeking to taint their opponents with innuendo and conspiracy theories. Look at the pizzagate nonsense for evidence of that.

It might be worth noting that the darling of the UK right, Margaret Thatcher, was a friend and admirer of Jimmy Saville for many years. She could hardly have been unaware of the rumours, but the evidence of any fighting isn't obvious.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

'Do not listen to those who say the voice of the people is the voice of God, since the tumult of the crowd is always close to madness.'

Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons.

Best worst system, but always important to recognise its many flaws. The popular route is not always the right one. Also as I've said before, the human hive mind is not the best example of considered decision making.

Edited by SW19 CPFC (22 Nov 2022 2.20pm)

Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons.

A true democracy will always fall afoul of just plain ignorance, desperation to align with ideology, 'group think' and dilution of responsibility.

Question the average person on their political, macro economic, humanitarian and sociological stance and they'd soon showcase their lack of credential to have a say.

Democracy is vulnerable to subversion and ignorance so to see it as a perfect system is bizarre. The extent comparative to which a centralization and shrinking of power can also be, and the ramifications of either, is another question.

Democracy is only ever really an alternative to creating absolute tyranny... or at least delegating the responsibility for it.

Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!