This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
becky over the moon 02 May 20 8.06am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
In 2008 we committed 0.7% of GDP to PHE pursuing global health assistance and strategies for precisely this reason. We played a big role in managing the Ebola outbreak in 2014. As with most events when it comes to humans - we quickly forget what happened in the near past and focus on the now. Do we really need that? We don’t need to fund that. I don’t remember that. It wasn’t that bad was it? It’s not a political issue. It’s a human trait. It’s how we’re wired - history will always repeat itself until we have a system that can predict for us. Cycle forward 12 years and adequate funding to prepare for this kind of scenario got binned a long time ago. We were simulating for pandemic response in 2012 (I think we know why in that specific scenario) And now here we are. We’ve not done badly but let’s not kid ourselves and think we’ve done ‘well’. To say no one knows how they’d prepare for it on the face of it is true - But also insanely obvious What you’re not thinking about or even aware of is what was being done to help reduce the unknowns in this exact situation was killed off some time ago - and this is the result. We had a strategy and we got complacent, had to cut budgets (allegedly) and went for the thing they felt had the least chance of reoccurrence based on memory. Foot and mouth, BSE. Happened ages ago innit SARS, Ebola - not our problem. We’re an island, we’ll be fine Classic normalcy bias. Take the first easy answer and move on. The majority of humanity is a joke.
Foot & Mouth, BSE SARS and Ebola were not global pandemics - you did not have 2/3rds of the world scrabbling to get PPE and ventilators simultaneously, and because they are all ones that are known and understood, any response to an outbreak will be swift and accurately targeted. COVID-19 was new, unknown and initially unpredictable in its behaviour. Yes,you can have a strategy for pandemic planning, but you cannot dot the i's and cross the t's until you actually know the full type and characteristics of what you are dealing with: unknown is exactly that - you can allow in your planning that there may be unknown factors, but you cannot plan for an unknown by it's very nature.
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Sir James Hird Mount Martha 02 May 20 8.38am | |
---|---|
Hi Guys,
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 02 May 20 9.53am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by croydon proud
Nonsense, and throw in a comma or full stop now and again! Woosh
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 02 May 20 9.59am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
Woosh Also nice to be criticised by both left and right
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 02 May 20 10.13am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by becky
Foot & Mouth, BSE SARS and Ebola were not global pandemics - you did not have 2/3rds of the world scrabbling to get PPE and ventilators simultaneously, and because they are all ones that are known and understood, any response to an outbreak will be swift and accurately targeted. COVID-19 was new, unknown and initially unpredictable in its behaviour. Yes,you can have a strategy for pandemic planning, but you cannot dot the i's and cross the t's until you actually know the full type and characteristics of what you are dealing with: unknown is exactly that - you can allow in your planning that there may be unknown factors, but you cannot plan for an unknown by it's very nature. You miss the point entirely.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Henry of Peckham Eton Mess 02 May 20 10.27am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Sir James Hird
Hi Guys, We didn't ... and then "led by science" our government took another three weeks to notice almost every other country was doing it. We're still letting people into the country unchecked and now we're talking about easing some lockdown measures for the rest of us because, we're not absolutely sure but, we think only the equivalent of three full planeloads of people are dying from Covid-19 each day. Impressive eh?
Denial is not just a river in Egypt |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SavoyTruffle 02 May 20 10.34am | |
---|---|
It’s literally just a game to them. [Tweet Link]
Who cares if loads of people are dead because we’ve got people who massage our figures and make us look good. At a time when so few trust political leadership this shouldn’t be celebrated. Seen people complaining for on weeks here about fake figures coming out of China, if blatant lies were coming from Iran, China, Russia etc people would call it what it is, why do some seem complicit.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 02 May 20 10.39am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SavoyTruffle
At a time when so few trust political leadership this shouldn’t be celebrated. Seen people complaining for on weeks here about fake figures coming out of China, if blatant lies were coming from Iran, China, Russia etc people would call it what it is, why do some seem complicit. This thread would be quite quiet if it wasn't for HOL's pair of commies who are using every opportunity to bash the government
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 02 May 20 11.08am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
This thread would be quite quiet if it wasn't for HOL's pair of commies who are using every opportunity to bash the government Spot on. Government bashing at this time is pathetic and childish imo. Ffs let us see this through and then let the enquiries begin.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 02 May 20 11.14am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
Also nice to be criticised by both left and right I just re read that one and it was a genuine question. You could have loosed on me but you didnt. Fair play sorry bout that. Lucky we arnt all as clever as me or we'd all be stupid
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SavoyTruffle 02 May 20 11.40am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
This thread would be quite quiet if it wasn't for HOL's pair of commies who are using every opportunity to bash the government I think you’ve just proven my point, resort to labels rather than critically think about the point I’ve made. If asking to not be lied to is bashing the government then guilty as charged. If it makes you feel better to put your head in the sand that’s fair enough. Thought there were more principled posters on the HOL.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 02 May 20 12.22pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SavoyTruffle
It’s literally just a game to them. [Tweet Link]
Who cares if loads of people are dead because we’ve got people who massage our figures and make us look good. At a time when so few trust political leadership this shouldn’t be celebrated. Seen people complaining for on weeks here about fake figures coming out of China, if blatant lies were coming from Iran, China, Russia etc people would call it what it is, why do some seem complicit. 'twas ever thus with politicians. After being slow out of the blocks in testing the government set an ambitious target personally I don't think we should get too hung up about the numbers. I am still not convinced what good this will do. For instance if someone self isolates by the time they have an appointment and get the test results back they will probably be free of the virus anyway. What we really need is an instant test. As to the numbers what should really matter is from now on we are doing mass testing on a daily basis and to try and ramp up the number continuously. As to the lies well each government has their on way of recording these numbers. Belgium has a high death rate because they include "suspected" deaths which we don't. Others do or don't include deaths outside of hospitals. As others have said we shall have to wait for the inquiry before we know how well or badly we have done. One final point it has been suggested if Corbyn was in power they would have done better than the Tories I don't believe that. If we can agree for one moment that the government has followed the expert advice then Corbyn would have done the same thing and probably made the same mistakes. The argument that Labour would have put more resources into the NHS and so be better prepared only works if Labour had been in power for at least 5 years. I accept that the Tories have underfunded the NHS but a 3 month old Corbyn government would not have time to turn the NHS around. Anyway whatever mistakes have been made in the past I prefer to focus on the here and now rather than the wishful thinking if only the voters had ... Edited by Badger11 (02 May 2020 12.28pm)
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.