I don't think what you say can be true. Any group which makes opposing what it sees as the growth of fascist attitudes and behaviour it's key feature, to the point of it being it's name, cannot have anything else at it's core.

If anyone involved in anything, Charlottesville included, was demonstrably wrongly described, then I would want to see that corrected. I want to see fairness and accuracy in everything.

Just as though the membership of Antifa is not exclusively communist does not excuse any member's behaviour so anyone using violence at Charlottesville not be excused just because they might not be a "proud boy". As always judge the action and not the label.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Whether you care what I think, or not, doesn't change facts.

Whether or not Antifa has activist communism at it's base, or not, is irrelevant to those facts.

Any group which describes itself as "anti-fascist" has anti fascism as it's core activity. What it's members think, or do, at other times is also irrelevant.

Seeking to tarnish the aims of a group by attaching irrelevant labels is something you have previously deplored. So why Antifa, despicable though they are?

Now that really is all that needs to be said.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

You said some are just opposed to fascism.
You dont counter that with stating that the USA or us are not fascist states; so the ones that are against that should wrap up and go somewhere like Korea or the like to protest.
Do you concur with that then?

Perhaps it's for you to wonder how I could have an opinion, which is based on evidence and also support your right to challenge it.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

There's nothing to wonder about! It's not your "evidence" (which may or may not be true, but is not disputed) which is in question. It is the assumptions you draw from that "evidence" which are then presented as the truth, when the real truth is that they are simply your opinion. As you now acknowledge.

But you are right. This has gone on too long, so I withdraw.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

I think you do really get my point.
You are playing dumb
You said some antifa are against fascism, not me but you wissy.
Why are they protesting when there is no fascism to protest.