So the definition is "Far-right politics, also referred to as the extreme right or right-wing extremism, "

tell us all what view he has that's far right?

What I dislike most about your input Wisbech is how you weasel about with truisms and word play.

It is an undeniable fact that pakistanis have a massively disproportionate amount of rapists among their number. It is also undeniable that the organised nature and scale of this criminality is unprecedented in living memory.

Please don't try to hide behind abuse at children's homes or the church or bloody Jimmy Saville because this is something completely incomparable.
It is also a matter of record that politicians have tried to cover this up.

Meanwhile, you and the other Lefty bores on here take your usual childish pleasure from knocking Robinson rather than facing up to the harsh reality.

Remember when people you probably wouldn't like said that immigrants were rapists, thieves and would take your job?
Seems they might not have been entirely wrong after all.
Maybe you could tell them that not all immigrants are bad. That will make them feel much better about what a dreadful cesspit this country is becoming because of mass immigration.

What I dislike most is the substitution of opinion for fact.

No-one is ever found guilty of being a pakistani. Other than, of course, by people like you. People are charged and punished, if found guilty, of crimes.

Neither being pakistani, Jimmy Saville or children's homes have any relevance to these crimes. Rape is the crime.

Whether there is any merit in discussing the resultant societal issues that may have emerged as a consequence of immigration, or how politicians have responded to them, is beside the point. They are serious, but separate, issues which need to be kept separate.

Yaxley-Lennon doesn't understand this. Nor do many posters, including yourself, it seems.

What distresses me is the fact that instead of actually helping to solve problems the approach of people like Yaxley-Lennon makes things worse. Potentially very much worse. All he is doing is stoking people's prejudices and fears without adding any kind of positive ideas on improvement.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

I think being pakistani is relevant to these crimes, simply because it has been hushed up by the powers that be, because of their ethnicity “ to preserve racial harmony”.... fact. If these were English men raping Muslim girls would it have been hushed up?

It just isn't though. If "the powers that be" have hushed things up then it won't because of the crimes. Courts deal with crimes. It will be for much wider considerations.

Additionally, these men are being referred to as "pakistani" but is that actually true? I thought some of those found guilty had other ethnicities. None of us actually know their immigration status. If they have been here more than 5 years and successfully completed the FLR and ILR requirements then they could very easily no longer be pakistani but legally as British as you and me. That's a fact that some here will find difficult to reconcile.

None of which relates to whether Mr Yaxley-Lennon was incorrectly described by the prosecution.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

If I want your opinion I will ask for it