I would make exactly the same judgement if I was the news editor concerned.

One story is about an ex President who is the front runner for the GOP but facing a multitude of charges, including trying to subvert democracy. This is unprecedented and a major story.

The other is primarily about the son of the current President, who has had a traumatic history and troubled past. That slurs are being made by political opponents of the President which try to link him, but without any evidence being presented in a Court, means this remains a story about political slurs.

Should Biden be charged or impeached then the story would become more important. Right now it isn’t.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

It never ends with the BBC

[Link]

One more point

What? A pervert abusive person at the BBC? Earning loads of money, yet untouchable? Well, I never!
It's in the Mail so ignore anyway. Cannot be true of the most respected and virtuous organisation in the world.
You'll be telling me there's bias in the media next!

Red and Blue Army!

I am really getting my knickers in a twist today about the BBC.
The world cup final had one token man as a pundit for some but not all of the time but other than that it was all female.
Now - it was Women's football so why not - I agree.
However - men's football is littered with female pundits and commentators so why not have the same policy for males and womens football?
Then I turn on the WAC and three women and one man - why not two of each?
I am sick to death of their bias - and I have to pay for it.

we can always trust the BBC staff and their new Verity department.

[Link]

One more point

We can't even like or dislike them, so you got no chance.

This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.