I see nothing weak about a respectful minutes silence towards those who are on the front line and have lost their lives doing so. Ironically the nurses and doctors that have died would've readily done so trying to save your life too if you needed their help. Feel free to ponder that the next time you're taking a dump.

You've been led down the garden path by David Ike level nonsense, cobbling together some kind of BBC enabled Bill Gates vaccine conspiracy. I'm not sure that you're in any position, in your mean spirited and mentally frazzled state, to lecture others on the nature of reality.

[Link]

"Critics have in the past raised concerns the foundation should not have any association with the program due to apparent conflicts of interest. That’s because the foundation also backs GAVI, a global vaccine alliance that counts big pharmaceutical companies as its partners"

The traditional drugs business model is broken due to the cost to develope a drug, the time to market (they have to re-coup investment within 20 years before the drug becomes generic and most of that is development), the fact that some drugs don't make it to market and the huge cost of associated lawsuits.

The answer to this is vaccinations as (1) they reach a huge mass market by default and (2) there are more prtections against litigation for the drug companies and if you google "Gates" and "indemnity" I'm sure you will find more being proposed as we speak due to the "pandemic".

It's a huge scam at your expense.

You go on thinking that vaccination is a scam if you like. I, and I hope most others, will go on using them as they save lives. Of course GAVI involves the pharma industry. It couldn't function effectively without them. That doesn't mean it's designed to do us harm. It just means that capitalism is being harnessed for good.

I note that you cherry pick what is actually in that article to suit your argument and miss out the context. Including, for instance, :-

“There was a perception that an external agency is funding it, so there could be influence,” Swaminathan said on Wednesday.

Swaminathan, however, stressed there were no instances of influence found and the decision was only in part prompted by a wider perception about foreign funding of the program."

Perceptions brought about by those who promote conspiracy theories.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Which is I’ve had a skinful of Guinness and I really want to let fly but is it worth the risk?

Oh my tolerance has very definite limits. For instance I will tolerate fools for a while, in the hope that I might be able to help them, but when it becomes clear I cannot then they get left to wallow in their own self deception.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Funnily enough it doesn’t me.

Whenever you post I think of sect members in a darkened room.