This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Bias against Trump
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 Midlands Eagle  28 Jun 19 10.24am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Park Road
Can someone explain if the text below, is the same as a correction l got from someone who claims he's not a compulsive liar! You just won't let it go will you. goodbye
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Stirlingsays 28 Jun 19 10.35am |
 |
|---|---|
|
? Very harsh.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 28 Jun 19 11.26am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Park Road
Can someone explain if the text below, is the same as a correction l got from someone who claims he's not a compulsive liar!
As an atheist I take very little interest in any religion or religious activity, although I am of course aware that Christians regard Sundays as their holy day and Muslims Fridays. What anyone does inside their halls is of no interest or concern to me unless and until it starts to spread outside. Now the correction : As an atheist I have no interest in belonging to any religion. I took an interest in some aspects of the Catholic Church because my wife belongs and believes and I needed to inform myself. I wanted to verify my own disbelief. I attended social events with her and got to know some Priests, one of whom I worked with on a social scheme here. I have had no need to study Islam or any childhood history to guide me, hence my relative ignorance
As the original writer let me assist you. Both are true. The key is in the tenses used. Take and took. The first is the current position. I take no active interest these days in any religion. I ceased participating on Catholic forums years ago. The second confirms the first and then explains what I did in the past, because you were questioning how I knew some things. Clear now?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 28 Jun 19 11.46am |
|
|---|---|
|
Park had asked you to stop posting to him and you refused and now he's gone.....and you're still frigging posting at him.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| steeleye20 Croydon 28 Jun 19 11.55am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Park had asked you to stop posting to him and you refused and now he's gone.....and you're still frigging posting at him.
Absurd even for HOL
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Teddy Eagle  28 Jun 19 11.55am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I can see no connection at all between the point I felt necessary to explain again and your response. Who-ever investigates would encounter a mix of types both of children and their parents, not all of whom are as loving and caring as I am sure everyone here is. I have not "defended the media"! All I have done is offer alternative suggestions to explain why they might have decided to restrain their coverage, either voluntarily or at the request of those investigating. I have no more idea than anyone else whether such suggestions are true. Nor have I offered any opinion on whether I approve or not, simply because I don't know enough to form an opinion. If you can’t see any connection then ask someone to explain it to you as per your suggestion on one of your own impenetrable observations.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 28 Jun 19 12.03pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Absurd even for HOL Welcome back Steely. Opponent or not anyone who can raise a smile or comment on the state of the English cricket team is a bonus.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| steeleye20 Croydon 28 Jun 19 5.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Here we go then:- Former President Jimmy Carter: If fully investigated, it would show that Trump didn't actually win the election in 2016. He lost the election and he was put in office because the Russians interfered ...on his behalf. Jimmy Carter still going - must be in late 90's- a lifetime's public service devoted to peace and a true christian.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 28 Jun 19 5.45pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Here we go then:- Former President Jimmy Carter: If fully investigated, it would show that Trump didn't actually win the election in 2016. He lost the election and he was put in office because the Russians interfered ...on his behalf. Jimmy Carter still going - must be in late 90's- a lifetime's public service devoted to peace and a true christian. Well, if anybody is going to know it's going to be a peanut farmer. But seriously, even if Russia interfered, which it did....it's influence is nothing compared to the interference coming from Silicon valley companies right now and indeed since 2016.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Teddy Eagle 28 Jun 19 5.48pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Here we go then:- Former President Jimmy Carter: If fully investigated, it would show that Trump didn't actually win the election in 2016. He lost the election and he was put in office because the Russians interfered ...on his behalf. Jimmy Carter still going - must be in late 90's- a lifetime's public service devoted to peace and a true christian. Looks as though he’s still recovering from being attacked by that vicious rabbit.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| steeleye20 Croydon 28 Jun 19 5.59pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Remembering Carter - he lost to Reagan after a disastrous military adventure in Iran? Well well.......
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 28 Jun 19 6.06pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Remembering Carter - he lost to Reagan after a disastrous military adventure in Iran? Well well....... Trump isn't failing for that one....he isn't a Bush....or a Democrat.....Well, not the modern version anyway. Trump's that guy who's always being successfully held back despite how weak he's held despite appearing desperate to get at you. Until Iran kill anyone nothing is happening.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.