This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
OknotOK Cockfosters, London 27 Feb 17 2.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Edited by nickgusset (27 Feb 2017 1.15pm) Problem is Nick that it doesn't really matter how people are making their decisions. The electoral results show that they are making their decisions - and they are almost universally unfavourable or at best apathetic towards Jeremy Corbyn. Many of Corbyn's policies would be popular. But for whatever the reasons - and whether you believe they are right or wrong - the majority of people have pretty clearly decided that JC will not make a good PM. And that is damaging the Labour party. Stoke was a relatively good result given the headwinds. But Copeland was an utter disaster. There have been some reasonable by-election performances under his leadership, but there have been some (very) poor ones and the Scottish elections were also catastrophic. While is coterie then blame everything but his leadership on the results, they move further and further away from both the truth and the public. And yes there is a lot of knifing-in-the-back going on, but the most disloyal MP in Labour history can't really expect MPs to be loyal to him. There has always been a difficulty for the Left. A centre-left party that might win or a left party that is likely to lose. Is a little bit of "left" better than none, but remaining "pure".
"It's almost like a moral decision. Except not really cos noone is going to find out," Jez, Peep Show |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 27 Feb 17 2.25pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Saying he wouldn't press the nuclear button was enough for me. Funnily enough Theresa May effectively saying she would be willing to incinerate millions put me off of her even more.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jimenez SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 27 Feb 17 2.31pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Funnily enough Theresa May effectively saying she would be willing to incinerate millions put me off of her even more. WOW that is a surprise !!
Pro USA & Israel |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Y Ddraig Goch In The Crowd 27 Feb 17 2.47pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Funnily enough Theresa May effectively saying she would be willing to incinerate millions put me off of her even more. Willing is an interesting word to use. I am not sure whether she is willing, more a case of prepared to should the need arise.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 27 Feb 17 2.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by OknotOK
Problem is Nick that it doesn't really matter how people are making their decisions. The electoral results show that they are making their decisions - and they are almost universally unfavourable or at best apathetic towards Jeremy Corbyn. Many of Corbyn's policies would be popular. But for whatever the reasons - and whether you believe they are right or wrong - the majority of people have pretty clearly decided that JC will not make a good PM. And that is damaging the Labour party. You are right, but has Corbyn ever been given anything other than a negative press? What a lot of people have failed to see is that the attacks in the media have been ad hominem and not rooted in policy (apart from trident, which is a very devisive issue so it could be argued that it is good that someone 'high up' can give a counter argument) I'd also argue that any Labour leader would face the same treatment. Look how many simple minded people laughed at anyone who considered Milliband to be a good leader because of the way he ate a sandwich. You rightly say many of Corbyns / Labours policies would be popular, why do you think the media keep a lid on them? What is it do you think that those who own the press (and therefore help shape the opinions of their readership about their beloved country (the readers-not the press barons who don't actuall live here!)) are worried about? Quote
Stoke was a relatively good result given the headwinds. But Copeland was an utter disaster. There have been some reasonable by-election performances under his leadership, but there have been some (very) poor ones and the Scottish elections were also catastrophic. Whilst disappointing, it's worth considering a few things about Copeland: The Labour vote has been falling election on election in Copeland. The local CLP were not allowed to put forward a 'left' candidate in the selection process. The majority was not a big one in the first place. Corbyn's distrust of nuclear didn't help as Sellafield is in the constituency. May's right wing rhetoric hoovered up UKIP votes. Without wishing to be accused of whataboutery, how come their weren't calls for May's head after a 23,000 majority was overturned in Richmond recently? This is a woman who promised to cut net migration to below 100,000 but actually oversaw the biggest inward migration peaks in all of British history! Not only does May have a track record of brazen incompetence, she's also a hard-right authoritarian with a penchant for totalitarian policies like secret courts, discriminatory immigration rules for British spouses, hopelessly flawed, evidence-free and unworkable drugs laws, unprecedented state snooping powers and the abolition of our human rights. You wouldn't know this though would you because May has been painted as a safe pair of hands. Quote
While his coterie then blame everything but his leadership on the results, they move further and further away from both the truth and the public. And yes there is a lot of knifing-in-the-back going on, but the most disloyal MP in Labour history can't really expect MPs to be loyal to him. There has always been a difficulty for the Left. A centre-left party that might win or a left party that is likely to lose. Is a little bit of "left" better than none, but remaining "pure".
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 27 Feb 17 2.56pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Funnily enough Theresa May effectively saying she would be willing to incinerate millions put me off of her even more. Thankfully not too many think like you Nick. The concept of mutual destruction has stopped a direct major war between superpowers since WW2.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
OldFella London 27 Feb 17 2.59pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Attlee and Corbyn. Attlee, although himself vastly overrated, deserves better than to be mentioned in the same sentence as Corbyn. The latter is wasting his own, and his party's time.
Jackson.. Wan Bissaka.... Sansom.. Nicholas.. Cannon.. Guehi.... Zaha... Thomas.. Byrne... Holton.. Rogers.. that should do it.. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 27 Feb 17 3.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by OldFella
Attlee and Corbyn. Attlee, although himself vastly overrated, deserves better than to be mentioned in the same sentence as Corbyn. The latter is wasting his own, and his party's time. You are mistaking opinions with facts on that blog! No links to back up the assertions.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Y Ddraig Goch In The Crowd 27 Feb 17 3.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Without wishing to be accused of whataboutery, how come their weren't calls for May's head after a 23,000 majority was overturned in Richmond recently? Tories didn't have a candidate?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
OknotOK Cockfosters, London 27 Feb 17 3.19pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
You are right, but has Corbyn ever been given anything other than a negative press? What a lot of people have failed to see is that the attacks in the media have been ad hominem and not rooted in policy (apart from trident, which is a very devisive issue so it could be argued that it is good that someone 'high up' can give a counter argument) I'd also argue that any Labour leader would face the same treatment. Look how many simple minded people laughed at anyone who considered Milliband to be a good leader because of the way he ate a sandwich. You rightly say many of Corbyns / Labours policies would be popular, why do you think the media keep a lid on them? What is it do you think that those who own the press (and therefore help shape the opinions of their readership about their beloved country (the readers-not the press barons who don't actuall live here!)) are worried about? I don't think there is any doubt that Corbyn is treated worse by the press than the majority of the alternatives would have been. And that's at least partly because he sets himself up to be. He and his advisers are disorganised, do regularly appear to announce and then reverse policies, and don't seem able to play the game. And while Corbynistas aren't willing to acknowledge that it pushes the party further and further from power. Quote
Whilst disappointing, it's worth considering a few things about Copeland: The Labour vote has been falling election on election in Copeland. The local CLP were not allowed to put forward a 'left' candidate in the selection process. The majority was not a big one in the first place. Corbyn's distrust of nuclear didn't help as Sellafield is in the constituency. May's right wing rhetoric hoovered up UKIP votes.Without wishing to be accused of whataboutery, how come their weren't calls for May's head after a 23,000 majority was overturned in Richmond recently? This is a woman who promised to cut net migration to below 100,000 but actually oversaw the biggest inward migration peaks in all of British history!Not only does May have a track record of brazen incompetence, she's also a hard-right authoritarian with a penchant for totalitarian policies like secret courts, discriminatory immigration rules for British spouses, hopelessly flawed, evidence-free and unworkable drugs laws, unprecedented state snooping powers and the abolition of our human rights.You wouldn't know this though would you because May has been painted as a safe pair of hands. You're buying into the same narrative. Yes there were local factors (of which the opposition to nuclear power is the biggest) but it's not accepting that Corbyn was a major factor in the loss. And it was a relatively safe seat - held for over 80 years in various guises - in the middle of a parliament with a government who are making huge cuts and so should have been very unpopular. Copeland should have been held comfortably. Winning Copeland and Stoke would have provided the Labour party with a positive narrative and something to build on. Losing Copeland - especially the way they did - was disastrous. And it was materially Corbyn's leadership that was the reason for that loss. And people from JC's inner sanctum coming out and blaming it on very poor turnout (when it was one of the highest turnouts for a by-election in generations) just make them look very stupid. Richmond had been a seat moving between the Tories and Lib Dems for ages. It was also a seat where the overwhelming issue - despite was some Brexiters suggested at the time - was lost because Goldsmith (not even a Tory candidate officially) campaigned on a Brexit agenda and the Lib Dems didn't. Quote
Corbyn is no more left wing than Atlee was. Yet he is painted as ultra left. I didn't say he was. But he is from the left rather than centre left (or certainly the centre left as is recognised politically nowadays). Edited by OknotOK (27 Feb 2017 3.22pm)
"It's almost like a moral decision. Except not really cos noone is going to find out," Jez, Peep Show |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
hedgehog50 Croydon 27 Feb 17 3.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Attlee was left wing in thinking nationalisation of industries would work - they didn't know better from experience then. Of course the NHS was a flagship left wing policy. But Attlee's government was also conservative with a small 'c' in some ways - their austerity measures make today's look a walk in the park. Attlee was also a great patriot, not something Corbyn is often accused of.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
matt_himself Matataland 27 Feb 17 3.24pm | |
---|---|
The paranoia of the Corbynistas is delicious: It's everyone's fault except Jezza's!
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.