This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 10 Nov 22 8.59pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
WE's answer is just believe and do what the establishment tell you. Unless he disagrees with it of course. Not at all. Most sensible people agree there is a need, whilst some hesitate to tackle it now. Including many who you would see as the "establishment", especially those who might lose their seats through taking unpopular decisions. My view is that you cannot postpone, just because it's difficult and painful. Ambivalence is not an option. There will be many competing demands in the future which, if succumbed to, would quickly blow us off course. This, and they, must be firmly resisted.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 10 Nov 22 9.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Yes we can, but more importantly we must, because what we cannot afford is to bequeath a future which leads to the death of billions. We just don't want to afford it, but we can, and the changes needed are really not so onerous. To speak only of costs is, I think, a misunderstanding. What we need to do is put more resources into ensuring those processes causing the problems are replaced with others that don't. That means a redeployment of people and industries, who will still earn money and make profits. Our real costs will come with the need to assist others to do the same, which will enable their people to remain and thrive where they are and not be driven to relocate. That in turn will mean they become more effective competitors, which will have its own impacts. We don't though have a choice. Being unhappy about it doesn't change that.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 10 Nov 22 9.10pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
You cannot compare the two. Covid was a relatively short term event, which hurt us economically and socially, but was overcome through science and fortitude. We can, and will, make a full recovery from Covid. Changing the way we live as a result of the need to respond to man made climate change is a long term commitment, whose costs are spread over decades and will also produce paybacks via new technologies. The "costs" are a distraction in my view, as they are probably unquantifiable. We need to concentrate on the benefits and encourage the people to view this as a positive opportunity.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 11 Nov 22 11.33am | |
---|---|
Not only is the UK the only major economy to be shrinking in the three months to September, but it is the only one not to have recovered in full the chunk of the economy lost during the pandemic. Amazingly, the UK still has an economy 0.4% smaller than in the quarter before the pandemic in Q4 2019. And they assault our brains with 'growth, growth growth', while all the time the tories have pushed us into negative growth, 0.4%. If their remedy is what we all expect, there is no investment or growth there, just pain except for mainly themselves. The financial black hole is not convincing imo and I have read a lot of economists who think the same. Why do we actually have to endure a long recession, at all?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 11 Nov 22 11.45am | |
---|---|
The black hole and structural problems are already there. I mean, it wasn’t that the national debt was created by Liz Truss’s 44 days in government.” Kwarteng has a point.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 11 Nov 22 11.54am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
The black hole and structural problems are already there. I mean, it wasn’t that the national debt was created by Liz Truss’s 44 days in government.” Kwarteng has a point. Indeed he does. However, I think it fair to say the acknowledgement of a 'black hole' and 'structural problems' does at least provide evidence for the need of having those in office able to deal with/counteract these issues. I think both the public and powers that be gave ol' Liz a brief pop at it and collectively decided: 'nah'.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 11 Nov 22 12.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
Indeed he does. However, I think it fair to say the acknowledgement of a 'black hole' and 'structural problems' does at least provide evidence for the need of having those in office able to deal with/counteract these issues. I think both the public and powers that be gave ol' Liz a brief pop at it and collectively decided: 'nah'. The political equivalent of a failed drunken one-night stand.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 11 Nov 22 4.08pm | |
---|---|
No respite for Sunak this time its Raab. MoJ staff offered ‘route out’ amid concerns over Dominic Raab behaviour. Some civil servants may have still been traumatised by his previous stint there, sources say. Rude aggressive bullying staff etc.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 11 Nov 22 4.13pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
The black hole and structural problems are already there. I mean, it wasn’t that the national debt was created by Liz Truss’s 44 days in government.” Kwarteng has a point. That's very true. The fact that Tory MPs thought Kwarteng's poor understanding and handling of market reaction creating a 60 billion loss was unacceptable yet regard Sunak....the guy who literally spent 400 billion keeping people at home is a little insane in my eyes. The markets apparently regard the ridiculous levels of spending by Sunak as sensible, yet when it's Kwarteng suddenly they throw a wobbler. Personally, I think there is more to it.....Sunak is their man.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 11 Nov 22 5.29pm | |
---|---|
Yesterday there was a UK Parliament vaccine debate. Dr John Campbell (nursing) reported on it and shows relevant clips from it here.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
croydon proud Any european country i fancy! 11 Nov 22 7.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
No respite for Sunak this time its Raab. MoJ staff offered ‘route out’ amid concerns over Dominic Raab behaviour. Some civil servants may have still been traumatised by his previous stint there, sources say. Rude aggressive bullying staff etc.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 11 Nov 22 7.23pm | |
---|---|
Bullying is really an individual thing.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.