This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
the silurian The garden of England.(not really) 18 Jul 23 6.51am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Oh I answered. You just don’t accept the answer. I have already explained the benefits. There’s no point in repeating them. You either get it, or you don’t. If you think everything has to convey a personal benefit, you won’t. If you think collectively then you will. Ok if you say so, however I can't see your answer maybe you can tell me what page it's on and I'll go look.....you have never explained the benefit of the BBC, there is no benefit that I can see so I'll give up now and leave you to your Cornish nudist beaches and ignore your pompous posts for a while.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
the silurian The garden of England.(not really) 18 Jul 23 7.03am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by the silurian
Ok if you say so, however I can't see your answer maybe you can tell me what page it's on and I'll go look.....you have never explained the benefit of the BBC, there is no benefit that I can see so I'll give up now and leave you to your Cornish nudist beaches and ignore your pompous posts for a while. I'll apologize oh pompous one, I have now found your nonsensical reply...still find that the BBC benefits me or many others in any way so we'll leave it there, anyway old boy the sun is out so Cornwall's nudist beaches must be calling you, you have a nice day!!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 18 Jul 23 7.06am | |
---|---|
The Times today (sorry behind paywall) Number of people paying their licence according to the BBC has fallen by 500,000 last year. I think the previous average was 250,000. As I said in an earlier post surveys can always be skewed this is real world data if this trend continues the BBC will be in real trouble which is why they are keen to replace the licence fee with a broadband tax. Government will announce a review in the Autumn.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 18 Jul 23 8.39am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by the silurian
I'll apologize oh pompous one, I have now found your nonsensical reply...still find that the BBC benefits me or many others in any way so we'll leave it there, anyway old boy the sun is out so Cornwall's nudist beaches must be calling you, you have a nice day!! Thank you for accepting that I replied and the confirmation that, as I suspected, you are too wrapped up in yourself to comprehend it. It’s raining. I am busy playing bowls and don’t tend to go on any beaches here in the summer. Too full of tourists.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 18 Jul 23 8.42am | |
---|---|
This from the BBC today makes interesting reading in the light of the recent comments here:-
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 18 Jul 23 8.46am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
This from the BBC today makes interesting reading in the light of the recent comments here:- This is the crux of the matter though. Will anyone mount a defence for them because people like their hamburgers?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Forest Hillbilly in a hidey-hole 18 Jul 23 8.49am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
This from the BBC today makes interesting reading in the light of the recent comments here:- I don't tend to read everything at face value. Especially from the BBC, who it seems were touting for complainants. Who hadn't actually complained to anyone before the BBC got in touch.
I disengage, I turn the page. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 18 Jul 23 8.49am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
The Times today (sorry behind paywall) Number of people paying their licence according to the BBC has fallen by 500,000 last year. I think the previous average was 250,000. As I said in an earlier post surveys can always be skewed this is real world data if this trend continues the BBC will be in real trouble which is why they are keen to replace the licence fee with a broadband tax. Government will announce a review in the Autumn. Changing the basis of the funding in that way makes perfect sense provided the way it is set up cannot be tampered with politically by future governments, without passing primary legislation. So long as the BBC’s independence is set in stone I don’t care how they are funded or if their peripheral activities curtailed.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 18 Jul 23 9.02am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly
I don't tend to read everything at face value. Especially from the BBC, who it seems were touting for complainants. Who hadn't actually complained to anyone before the BBC got in touch. Nor, from what I recall, did anyone complain they, or their children, were abused by Savile all those years ago. Doesn’t mean it didn’t happen though and if you heard the former employee telling her story on Radio 4 this morning you would have little doubt it is true. McDonalds have accepted that there is a very widespread problem involving young part time staff and older full time supervisory staff. Their whole set up is an open invitation to abuse and abusers. So instead of trying to turn a truly valuable piece of investigative journalism into yet another opportunity to have a pop at the BBC maybe some credit is due for them having learned and now finding and exposing abuse elsewhere. Or do you only care if it happens at the BBC?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
georgenorman 18 Jul 23 9.08am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Changing the basis of the funding in that way makes perfect sense provided the way it is set up cannot be tampered with politically by future governments, without passing primary legislation. So long as the BBC’s independence is set in stone I don’t care how they are funded or if their peripheral activities curtailed. The BBC should compete with other service providers on a level playing field and seek investment and generate income as others do. There is no justification whatsoever for the current setup.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 18 Jul 23 9.10am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Nor, from what I recall, did anyone complain they, or their children, were abused by Savile all those years ago. Doesn’t mean it didn’t happen though and if you heard the former employee telling her story on Radio 4 this morning you would have little doubt it is true. McDonalds have accepted that there is a very widespread problem involving young part time staff and older full time supervisory staff. Their whole set up is an open invitation to abuse and abusers. So instead of trying to turn a truly valuable piece of investigative journalism into yet another opportunity to have a pop at the BBC maybe some credit is due for them having learned and now finding and exposing abuse elsewhere. Or do you only care if it happens at the BBC? They had no idea.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 18 Jul 23 9.16am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
This from the BBC today makes interesting reading in the light of the recent comments here:- A Mcsexualassaultcase with a large order of racism please. I am going to say this bluntly, but I was under the impression that McDonalds are not famed for hiring the brightest and best at their branches? I certainly don't condone it, quite the opposite in fact, but is 'uncovering' stories of inappropriate behaviour and language at an employer which is pretty ubiquitously known as a last chance saloon for the nigh unemployable really news? Doesn't seem to be anything beyond the expected here, generally thick people saying and doing generally thick things. Doesn't make it OK of course not, ideally we'd work in a world without these happenings but we don't, we live in a world where some people have to work at McDonalds. If ever there was an incentive to make a bit more of yourself so you don't 'end up working at McDonalds' this earth shattering news would only slightly improve the narrative around this sentiment. There's a war in Europe, record breaking temperatures and a sex scandal involving a high profile public figure currently in action, amongst other things, but the state of staffing at McDonalds steals the show. Edited by Nicholas91 (18 Jul 2023 9.18am)
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.