This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
taldous123 Perth 18 Aug 16 5.22am | |
---|---|
Bugger i missed the big 300!! Still no news zzz. Will it get to 350?
We're the red and blue army!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Palace_Guard Kyiv 18 Aug 16 5.45am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by AussiePalace
Who on earth valued Remy at that price, Ross??? There are some articles on the Holmesdale front page.
Live in Melbourne or Victoria, Australia? Well join the Crystal Palace Melbourne Supporters Club: Adelaide, South Australia? Join here: |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
AussiePalace Melbourne, Australia 18 Aug 16 6.16am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Palace_Guard
There are some articles on the Holmesdale front page. Surely a bloke who cost about 10m, and sat on a bench for two years isn't "worth," 28m now. Those figures are rubbish. Pure rubbish.
Executive Junior Assistant's Vice President's P.A - CPFC Melbourne Supporters Club |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
beagle pom tiddly om pom pom 18 Aug 16 6.38am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by bexleydave
I haven't read the actual Champions League clause, only what's been 'leaked' by a media outlet, but I suspect, in context, the clause isn't as sensational or stupid as it's been portrayed.
When the time comes, I want die just like my Dad - at peace and asleep. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
bexleydave Barnehurst 18 Aug 16 6.59am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by beagle
The club isn't run by idiots and I don't for a second believe, out of rank stupidity, they would start inserting pie-in-the-sky clauses into contracts without thinking it through first. I haven't read the actual Champions League clause, only what's been 'leaked' by a media outlet, but I suspect, in context, the clause isn't as sensational or stupid as it's been portrayed.
Anyone SERIOUS about doing a deal would not insert a clause that depended on CL football at Palace. There isn't a football club in the country that would agree to part of a payment depending on such a condition in relation to us. If it wasn't out-and-out stupidity the only other possible explanation is that it was done knowing that it would scupper the deal, leaving the owners with a ready-made excuse, on I September, that they tried hard, but failed, thus keeping the cash in their pockets and placating the support. Personally I prefer to believe it was a ridiculous bit of willy waving by Parish, rather than a Machiavellian plot to excuse a poor window.
Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
radsyrendot From Coventry now in Leicester 18 Aug 16 8.03am | |
---|---|
So true it's embarrassing Attachment: image.jpeg (140.10Kb)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Aray South London 18 Aug 16 8.05am | |
---|---|
Probably yes there may be several ways of portraying it. I'd prefer to see the entire contents of the contract before casting judgement and also to look at similar contracts for other players (and have knowledge of how the negotiations progressed. A more realistic end-point would probably be a Europa league-linked bonus. I'd guess that this kind of negotiation tactic is not as uncommon as some on here would like to think. That it was leaked is probably also part of the negotiation. So fans like you put pressure on the management. Originally posted by bexleydave
Is there another was of portraying it then? Anyone SERIOUS about doing a deal would not insert a clause that depended on CL football at Palace. There isn't a football club in the country that would agree to part of a payment depending on such a condition in relation to us. If it wasn't out-and-out stupidity the only other possible explanation is that it was done knowing that it would scupper the deal, leaving the owners with a ready-made excuse, on I September, that they tried hard, but failed, thus keeping the cash in their pockets and placating the support. Personally I prefer to believe it was a ridiculous bit of willy waving by Parish, rather than a Machiavellian plot to excuse a poor window.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 18 Aug 16 8.32am | |
---|---|
Today's the day.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
bexleydave Barnehurst 18 Aug 16 8.38am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Aray
Probably yes there may be several ways of portraying it. I'd prefer to see the entire contents of the contract before casting judgement and also to look at similar contracts for other players (and have knowledge of how the negotiations progressed. A more realistic end-point would probably be a Europa league-linked bonus. I'd guess that this kind of negotiation tactic is not as uncommon as some on here would like to think. That it was leaked is probably also part of the negotiation. So fans like you put pressure on the management.
Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 18 Aug 16 8.40am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by bexleydave
No chance of that, I'm afraid.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
richard shaw (og)65 my minds eye 18 Aug 16 8.41am | |
---|---|
Thursday ?
interviewer " iggy , do you think you influenced anybody?" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
richard shaw (og)65 my minds eye 18 Aug 16 8.49am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by bexleydave
Anyone SERIOUS about doing a deal would not insert a clause that depended on CL football at Palace. There isn't a football club in the country that would agree to part of a payment depending on such a condition in relation to us. If it wasn't out-and-out stupidity the only other possible explanation is that it was done knowing that it would scupper the deal, leaving the owners with a ready-made excuse, on I September, that they tried hard, but failed, thus keeping the cash in their pockets and placating the support. Personally I prefer to believe it was a ridiculous bit of willy waving by Parish, rather than a Machiavellian plot to excuse a poor window. I`m pretty sure that most contracts have these sort of clauses ,I bet even craig Harrison had a clause that boro got a certain amount if he played for England !! but this is so high profile and its been leaked makes me suspicious that its more than likely been leaked by Liverpool. they have done that to make palace pay up and do the deal . pre the internet all this stuff didn't get poured over and dissected by us fans , it happened or it didn't , winds me up to be fair
interviewer " iggy , do you think you influenced anybody?" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.