This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
the silurian The garden of England.(not really) 17 Jul 23 4.15pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I haven’t noticed any questions from you, though to be fair I tend to ignore your “contributions”. What is it you are asking? Just checked. You made this claim before. I responded on 14th July at 11.33. I answered, even if you either disagree or cannot understand.
Where did you answer? I haven't seen it....I asked exactly how I benefit from the BBC because I dont see how I do
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 17 Jul 23 4.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by the silurian
Where did you answer? I haven't seen it....I asked exactly how I benefit from the BBC because I dont see how I do Unless you have detached yourself completely from the UK you benefit in the same way everyone benefits. The BBC is a national asset, alongside all the others. We pay for most via taxation. We pay for the BBC in a different way to ensure it stays away from political influence. Which alone is something of inestimable value.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 17 Jul 23 4.27pm | |
---|---|
Move on. Nothing to see.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
the silurian The garden of England.(not really) 17 Jul 23 4.31pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Unless you have detached yourself completely from the UK you benefit in the same way everyone benefits. The BBC is a national asset, alongside all the others. We pay for most via taxation. We pay for the BBC in a different way to ensure it stays away from political influence. Which alone is something of inestimable value. In your opinion! I benefit in no way at all from BBC tv or radio....and you didn't answer at 11.33 on the 14th I just looked. So this inestimable value is what exactly?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 17 Jul 23 5.12pm | |
---|---|
Sensationalist nonsense.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 17 Jul 23 5.15pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by the silurian
He won't answer because he has no idea how....I've asked three times with no reply! Fred knows HOW
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 17 Jul 23 5.22pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Sensationalist nonsense. Typical of that right-wing rag.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 17 Jul 23 10.58pm | |
---|---|
As I have asked before, do you read the links you provide? What that one actually says is what I have also said many times now. That the BBC could have done better, and have learned how to. If their staff really felt intimidated then that obviously needed to be rectified and the revised protocols have hopefully addressed that. That all might be true but what isn’t is that there was a deliberate cover-up by management. What happened was the consequence of a different culture during a different time. Instead of using hindsight to try to bring down an organisation that some despise for their own reasons we ought, in my opinion, give due credit for the willingness to learn and allow the BBC to move on and do what they do best. Provide unbiased journalism of the highest order with the maximum integrity.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 17 Jul 23 11.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by the silurian
In your opinion! I benefit in no way at all from BBC tv or radio....and you didn't answer at 11.33 on the 14th I just looked. So this inestimable value is what exactly? Oh I answered. You just don’t accept the answer. I have already explained the benefits. There’s no point in repeating them. You either get it, or you don’t. If you think everything has to convey a personal benefit, you won’t. If you think collectively then you will.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 17 Jul 23 11.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
As I have asked before, do you read the links you provide? What that one actually says is what I have also said many times now. That the BBC could have done better, and have learned how to. If their staff really felt intimidated then that obviously needed to be rectified and the revised protocols have hopefully addressed that. That all might be true but what isn’t is that there was a deliberate cover-up by management. What happened was the consequence of a different culture during a different time. Instead of using hindsight to try to bring down an organisation that some despise for their own reasons we ought, in my opinion, give due credit for the willingness to learn and allow the BBC to move on and do what they do best. Provide unbiased journalism of the highest order with the maximum integrity. And as I have said I'm more concerned with the fate of abused children than in defending the reputation of a broadcaster however unbiased they're claimed to be.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 17 Jul 23 11.20pm | |
---|---|
It's pointless debating with an idealogue. I am trying to limit my responses to issues of fact and only extreme
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The Dolphin 18 Jul 23 6.46am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
As I have asked before, do you read the links you provide? What that one actually says is what I have also said many times now. That the BBC could have done better, and have learned how to. If their staff really felt intimidated then that obviously needed to be rectified and the revised protocols have hopefully addressed that. That all might be true but what isn’t is that there was a deliberate cover-up by management. What happened was the consequence of a different culture during a different time. Instead of using hindsight to try to bring down an organisation that some despise for their own reasons we ought, in my opinion, give due credit for the willingness to learn and allow the BBC to move on and do what they do best. Provide unbiased journalism of the highest order with the maximum integrity. The BBC is a left wing, liberal monolith - that might not be the right word - that believes it can do no wrong.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.