You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)
September 20 2024 4.34am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

BBC (again)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 301 of 435 < 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 >

  

the silurian Flag The garden of England.(not really) 17 Jul 23 4.15pm Send a Private Message to the silurian Add the silurian as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I haven’t noticed any questions from you, though to be fair I tend to ignore your “contributions”. What is it you are asking?

Just checked. You made this claim before.

I responded on 14th July at 11.33.

I answered, even if you either disagree or cannot understand.


Edited by Wisbech Eagle (17 Jul 2023 10.38am)

Where did you answer? I haven't seen it....I asked exactly how I benefit from the BBC because I dont see how I do

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 17 Jul 23 4.21pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by the silurian

Where did you answer? I haven't seen it....I asked exactly how I benefit from the BBC because I dont see how I do

Unless you have detached yourself completely from the UK you benefit in the same way everyone benefits. The BBC is a national asset, alongside all the others. We pay for most via taxation. We pay for the BBC in a different way to ensure it stays away from political influence. Which alone is something of inestimable value.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 17 Jul 23 4.27pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Move on. Nothing to see.

[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
the silurian Flag The garden of England.(not really) 17 Jul 23 4.31pm Send a Private Message to the silurian Add the silurian as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Unless you have detached yourself completely from the UK you benefit in the same way everyone benefits. The BBC is a national asset, alongside all the others. We pay for most via taxation. We pay for the BBC in a different way to ensure it stays away from political influence. Which alone is something of inestimable value.

In your opinion! I benefit in no way at all from BBC tv or radio....and you didn't answer at 11.33 on the 14th I just looked. So this inestimable value is what exactly?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 17 Jul 23 5.12pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Move on. Nothing to see.

[Link]

Sensationalist nonsense.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
cryrst Flag The garden of England 17 Jul 23 5.15pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by the silurian

He won't answer because he has no idea how....I've asked three times with no reply!

Fred knows HOW

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 17 Jul 23 5.22pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

Sensationalist nonsense.

Typical of that right-wing rag.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 17 Jul 23 10.58pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Move on. Nothing to see.

[Link]

As I have asked before, do you read the links you provide?

What that one actually says is what I have also said many times now.

That the BBC could have done better, and have learned how to. If their staff really felt intimidated then that obviously needed to be rectified and the revised protocols have hopefully addressed that.

That all might be true but what isn’t is that there was a deliberate cover-up by management. What happened was the consequence of a different culture during a different time. Instead of using hindsight to try to bring down an organisation that some despise for their own reasons we ought, in my opinion, give due credit for the willingness to learn and allow the BBC to move on and do what they do best. Provide unbiased journalism of the highest order with the maximum integrity.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 17 Jul 23 11.02pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by the silurian

In your opinion! I benefit in no way at all from BBC tv or radio....and you didn't answer at 11.33 on the 14th I just looked. So this inestimable value is what exactly?

Oh I answered. You just don’t accept the answer.

I have already explained the benefits. There’s no point in repeating them. You either get it, or you don’t.

If you think everything has to convey a personal benefit, you won’t. If you think collectively then you will.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 17 Jul 23 11.12pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

As I have asked before, do you read the links you provide?

What that one actually says is what I have also said many times now.

That the BBC could have done better, and have learned how to. If their staff really felt intimidated then that obviously needed to be rectified and the revised protocols have hopefully addressed that.

That all might be true but what isn’t is that there was a deliberate cover-up by management. What happened was the consequence of a different culture during a different time. Instead of using hindsight to try to bring down an organisation that some despise for their own reasons we ought, in my opinion, give due credit for the willingness to learn and allow the BBC to move on and do what they do best. Provide unbiased journalism of the highest order with the maximum integrity.

And as I have said I'm more concerned with the fate of abused children than in defending the reputation of a broadcaster however unbiased they're claimed to be.
A different culture in a different time is a pointless defence. Does that count for Nazi war criminals or the descendants of slave owners?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 17 Jul 23 11.20pm Send a Private Message to HKOwen Add HKOwen as a friend

It's pointless debating with an idealogue.

I am trying to limit my responses to issues of fact and only extreme
deluded hubris.

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
The Dolphin Flag 18 Jul 23 6.46am Send a Private Message to The Dolphin Add The Dolphin as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

As I have asked before, do you read the links you provide?

What that one actually says is what I have also said many times now.

That the BBC could have done better, and have learned how to. If their staff really felt intimidated then that obviously needed to be rectified and the revised protocols have hopefully addressed that.

That all might be true but what isn’t is that there was a deliberate cover-up by management. What happened was the consequence of a different culture during a different time. Instead of using hindsight to try to bring down an organisation that some despise for their own reasons we ought, in my opinion, give due credit for the willingness to learn and allow the BBC to move on and do what they do best. Provide unbiased journalism of the highest order with the maximum integrity.

The BBC is a left wing, liberal monolith - that might not be the right word - that believes it can do no wrong.
There are no rules - bar their own.
They are funded by stupid people - their thoughts not mine - and so they self-govern and when it doesn't work out, nothing really happens to them - the ball just keeps rolling.
They produce some good stuff for sure but they are nothing like the great Broadcaster that they once were.
If they did what they do and behaved as they behave in the real world they would be dismantled in minutes.
I take no joy in saying it - I was brought up on the BBC.
I always thought that it was the best news channel in the world - I am patriotic and do silly things - like fly BA whenever I can.
The BBC is bloated and beyond its sell by date. It is out of control and a dangerous organisation and should be forced to fend for itself without us backing it.
Defund asap!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 301 of 435 < 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)