You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)
November 25 2024 4.35pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

BBC (again)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 300 of 435 < 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 >

  

Teddy Eagle Flag 17 Jul 23 12.16pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I wasn’t often on holiday. More usually on business or, for a while, living, elsewhere.

What I saw didn’t confirm a bias. It confirmed a personal opinion.

That's what confirmation bias does.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 17 Jul 23 12.20pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

That's what confirmation bias does.

Oh no it doesn't

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 17 Jul 23 12.39pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

Oh no it doesn't

If Mr. Punch worked for the BBC he'd be the epitome of uxoriousness.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 17 Jul 23 12.58pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

If Mr. Punch worked for the BBC he'd be the epitome of uxoriousness.

She'd perhaps be a little old for a BBC front man if over 16. You could guarantee no employee would have reported his wife beating properly. None would have actually seen it, despite it being part of the show. And management wouldn't turn a blind eye - they'd just not know as much as everyone else did. Must be the most genuinely stupid people ever.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 17 Jul 23 1.02pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

She'd perhaps be a little old for a BBC front man if over 16. You could guarantee no employee would have reported his wife beating properly. None would have actually seen it, despite it being part of the show. And management wouldn't turn a blind eye - they'd just not know as much as everyone else did. Must be the most genuinely stupid people ever.

He'd get some grief for eating non-vegan sausages and ill-treating an endangered crocodile though.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
eagleman13 Flag On The Road To Hell & Alicante 17 Jul 23 1.06pm Send a Private Message to eagleman13 Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add eagleman13 as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

He'd get some grief for eating non-vegan sausages and ill-treating an endangered crocodile though.

And look what happened when the Police arrived . . .

 


This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 17 Jul 23 1.09pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by eagleman13

And look what happened when the Police arrived . . .

He beat Sting senseless.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 17 Jul 23 1.24pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by eagleman13

And look what happened when the Police arrived . . .

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 17 Jul 23 3.58pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by georgenorman

The Guardian (yes, the Guardian) headlined Prescod's remarks as "Unconscious bias training is ‘nonsense’, says outgoing race relations chair"!

Did you miss the subject of the remark? Which is the training, not any subjective bias itself!

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 17 Jul 23 4.03pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

That's what confirmation bias does.

I have, what I regard as a well founded, bias about the BBC. I don’t thought about what others say about it. Ask me what the attitudes here are and you would get an honest answer, which I would disagree with but not hide.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 17 Jul 23 4.11pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I have, what I regard as a well founded, bias about the BBC. I don’t thought about what others say about it. Ask me what the attitudes here are and you would get an honest answer, which I would disagree with but not hide.

Er...right.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 17 Jul 23 4.14pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

Nobody with any sense could seriously believe the BBC harboured paedos. It's only made up by red tops wanting an end to the liberal centre ground press. It literally didn't happen - despite what everybody can see or read with their own eyes. Don't believe them - you're being fooled. You're weak minded and far right to even consider the mountain of evidence.

That paedos work for the BBC is beyond doubt. I have little doubt they could be found in any large organisation. The difference is they attract more attention if and when discovered.

That’s not the issue. It’s whether the BBC was complicit in covering up their activities and there is simply no evidence that is true. There’s tonnes of innuendo, assertions and assumptions but nothing has ever ended up in court, let alone seen a conviction.

Could they have done better? Certainly. Have they learned? It seems so. Does that stop the right thinking they are all cut from the same cloth? No.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 300 of 435 < 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)