Weinstein.

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Weinstein.

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 30 of 35 < 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 >

Rudi Hedman Caterham 31 Oct 17 12.32am
Any politicians wear the veil yet? Teachers, doctors, nurses, bank supermarket checkout staff, sales assistants? Are you okay with any or all of them wearing a veil? COYP
Alert a moderator to this post

Rudi Hedman

Caterham 31 Oct 17 12.32am

Any politicians wear the veil yet? Teachers, doctors, nurses, bank supermarket checkout staff, sales assistants?

Are you okay with any or all of them wearing a veil?

COYP

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 31 Oct 17 12.46am
Originally posted by nickgusset Oh dear. Is that what you are now reduced to? Repeating the same non response over and over. You just can't credibly defend your own statements.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

31 Oct 17 12.46am

Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger

Originally posted by nickgusset

Oh dear.

Is that what you are now reduced to? Repeating the same non response over and over.

You just can't credibly defend your own statements.

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 31 Oct 17 12.52am
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman Any politicians wear the veil yet? Teachers, doctors, nurses, bank supermarket checkout staff, sales assistants? Are you okay with any or all of them wearing a veil? Not particularly, but to be honest I haven't seen any. If you can give me examples of where this is the case, you might have an argument. What's your opinion of orthodox Jewsish subjugation of women. They don't mix. You can't move in Stamford Hill for them. (I am being ironic here) Being forced to wear those wigs. Why aren't you making a fuss about them? Note how I'm deliberately using the dead cat ,but what about them , technique favoured by those who want to derail a thread because a) they don't have a decent counter argument or b) in this case, because they feel uncomfortable when thinking about the way they might have treated women in the past (notice how here I've made up something that is probably completely untrue, but notice how authoritative it sounds, in order to try to obfuscate things) Edited by nickgusset (31 Oct 2017 1.02am)
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 31 Oct 17 12.52am

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

Any politicians wear the veil yet? Teachers, doctors, nurses, bank supermarket checkout staff, sales assistants?

Are you okay with any or all of them wearing a veil?

Not particularly, but to be honest I haven't seen any. If you can give me examples of where this is the case, you might have an argument.

What's your opinion of orthodox Jewsish subjugation of women. They don't mix. You can't move in Stamford Hill for them. (I am being ironic here) Being forced to wear those wigs. Why aren't you making a fuss about them?

Note how I'm deliberately using the dead cat ,but what about them , technique favoured by those who want to derail a thread because a) they don't have a decent counter argument or b) in this case, because they feel uncomfortable when thinking about the way they might have treated women in the past (notice how here I've made up something that is probably completely untrue, but notice how authoritative it sounds, in order to try to obfuscate things)

Edited by nickgusset (31 Oct 2017 1.02am)

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 31 Oct 17 12.57am
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger Is that what you are now reduced to? Repeating the same non response over and over. You just can't credibly defend your own statements. No. It's actually what I say out loud to myself when you post such unfounded nonsense. I've found myself saying it a lot lately haven't I. Now are you going to continue with your patheticness and follow me around the hol, across threads, something which you have been warned about before, and something which you've done from the first day you appeared on here or are you going to give it a rest, because quite frankly , it makes you look a bit pathetic. Your choice.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 31 Oct 17 12.57am

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Is that what you are now reduced to? Repeating the same non response over and over.

You just can't credibly defend your own statements.

No. It's actually what I say out loud to myself when you post such unfounded nonsense. I've found myself saying it a lot lately haven't I.

Now are you going to continue with your patheticness and follow me around the hol, across threads, something which you have been warned about before, and something which you've done from the first day you appeared on here or are you going to give it a rest, because quite frankly , it makes you look a bit pathetic.

Your choice.

Alert a moderator to this post

Jimenez SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 31 Oct 17 1.03am
1am 'Oh Dear' Pro USA & Israel
Alert a moderator to this post

Jimenez

SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 31 Oct 17 1.03am

1am 'Oh Dear'

Pro USA & Israel

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 31 Oct 17 1.36am
Originally posted by nickgusset No. It's actually what I say out loud to myself when you post such unfounded nonsense. I've found myself saying it a lot lately haven't I. Now are you going to continue with your patheticness and follow me around the hol, across threads, something which you have been warned about before, and something which you've done from the first day you appeared on here or are you going to give it a rest, because quite frankly , it makes you look a bit pathetic. Your choice. Mmmm....no leg to stand on writing this. You really need to live by your own principles. I'm sure Nick that you need only ask him to politely stop directly replying to your posts and I'm sure he'd respect that. You were asked this twice of course by two different posters and refused to honour this request. You gave glib replies when asked why and never apologised for what amounts to a soft form of harassment....the posters had, in effect, to stop using the site to avoid you. The fact that you say Hrolf was warned but apparently nothing was said to you is also a bit concerning. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

31 Oct 17 1.36am

Originally posted by nickgusset

No. It's actually what I say out loud to myself when you post such unfounded nonsense. I've found myself saying it a lot lately haven't I.

Your choice.

Mmmm....no leg to stand on writing this. You really need to live by your own principles.

I'm sure Nick that you need only ask him to politely stop directly replying to your posts and I'm sure he'd respect that.

You were asked this twice of course by two different posters and refused to honour this request. You gave glib replies when asked why and never apologised for what amounts to a soft form of harassment....the posters had, in effect, to stop using the site to avoid you.

The fact that you say Hrolf was warned but apparently nothing was said to you is also a bit concerning.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

hedgehog50 Croydon 31 Oct 17 7.54am
Originally posted by nickgusset Wrong. I haven't said either way what I think about Islamic immigration. What I have said is I don't like the scapegoating of Muslims. Now, back to the subject in hand... With all the allegations going on, should some offences be deemed 'of their time' and a zero tolerance enacted from now with no further action? This leads though to the question of what is the tipping point of what constitutes an actionable offence (ie those not covered by the amnesty I've suggested) How much truth is there in the reports that Tory whips and TM are well aware that sexual harrasment and other 'misdemeanors' have taken place, but are not reporting it so that the info held could be used to persuade mp's to vote a certain way? Edited by nickgusset (30 Oct 2017 9.49pm) We'll just have to take a wild guess on your views on it then! We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]
Alert a moderator to this post

hedgehog50

Croydon 31 Oct 17 7.54am

Originally posted by nickgusset

Wrong. I haven't said either way what I think about Islamic immigration.
What I have said is I don't like the scapegoating of Muslims.

Now, back to the subject in hand...

With all the allegations going on, should some offences be deemed 'of their time' and a zero tolerance enacted from now with no further action?
This leads though to the question of what is the tipping point of what constitutes an actionable offence (ie those not covered by the amnesty I've suggested)
How much truth is there in the reports that Tory whips and TM are well aware that sexual harrasment and other 'misdemeanors' have taken place, but are not reporting it so that the info held could be used to persuade mp's to vote a certain way?

Edited by nickgusset (30 Oct 2017 9.49pm)

We'll just have to take a wild guess on your views on it then!

We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert a moderator to this post

hedgehog50 Croydon 31 Oct 17 7.56am
Originally posted by legaleagle Jesus wept. I sit next to a practising muslim woman at work.I know for sure who is the more tolerant (and more repressed)out of her and Hrolf in their general attitudes. It may be doubted as to whether he's actually personally known a muslim in his life.. As for "caribbean-style mentality" of our youth tosh,has Hrolf actually examined the latest stats released by the Met covering 2015-16 re knife crime...very significant numbers of white and other non- Caribbean origin youngsters...Knife crime is indeed a serious concern of our time...but has very British roots in this country and featured heavily in "our" culture in the 19th century.Perhaps there was even a Hrolf the Eveready to use a blade in Victorian Norwood? Meanwhile,some people on here accuse Nick G of being a bigot and a racist....strange days indeed,as John Lennon put it. You are seriously denying that black youths are over represented in knife crimes? We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]
Alert a moderator to this post

hedgehog50

Croydon 31 Oct 17 7.56am

Originally posted by legaleagle

Jesus wept.

I sit next to a practising muslim woman at work.I know for sure who is the more tolerant (and more repressed)out of her and Hrolf in their general attitudes.

It may be doubted as to whether he's actually personally known a muslim in his life..

As for "caribbean-style mentality" of our youth tosh,has Hrolf actually examined the latest stats released by the Met covering 2015-16 re knife crime...very significant numbers of white and other non- Caribbean origin youngsters...Knife crime is indeed a serious concern of our time...but has very British roots in this country and featured heavily in "our" culture in the 19th century.Perhaps there was even a Hrolf the Eveready to use a blade in Victorian Norwood?

Meanwhile,some people on here accuse Nick G of being a bigot and a racist....strange days indeed,as John Lennon put it.

You are seriously denying that black youths are over represented in knife crimes?

We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert a moderator to this post

hedgehog50 Croydon 31 Oct 17 7.58am
Originally posted by nickgusset What should Theresa May do with her naughty mp's? Get the whips on them. We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]
Alert a moderator to this post

hedgehog50

Croydon 31 Oct 17 7.58am

Originally posted by nickgusset

What should Theresa May do with her naughty mp's?

Get the whips on them.

We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8 Hevon 31 Oct 17 8.14am
Originally posted by hedgehog50 You are seriously denying that black youths are over represented in knife crimes? They are but if we cross Birmingham and London off the list then across the UK they are not. Big chest and massive boobs [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8

Hevon 31 Oct 17 8.14am

Originally posted by hedgehog50

You are seriously denying that black youths are over represented in knife crimes?

They are but if we cross Birmingham and London off the list then across the UK they are not.

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

palace_in_frogland In a broken dream 31 Oct 17 8.23am
Originally posted by nickgusset Not particularly, but to be honest I haven't seen any. If you can give me examples of where this is the case, you might have an argument. What's your opinion of orthodox Jewsish subjugation of women. They don't mix. You can't move in Stamford Hill for them. (I am being ironic here) Being forced to wear those wigs. Why aren't you making a fuss about them? Note how I'm deliberately using the dead cat ,but what about them , technique favoured by those who want to derail a thread because a) they don't have a decent counter argument or b) in this case, because they feel uncomfortable when thinking about the way they might have treated women in the past (notice how here I've made up something that is probably completely untrue, but notice how authoritative it sounds, in order to try to obfuscate things) Edited by nickgusset (31 Oct 2017 1.02am) Ha ha. FYI this thread is entitled “Weinstein”.
Alert a moderator to this post

palace_in_frogland

In a broken dream 31 Oct 17 8.23am

Send a Private Message to palace_in_frogland

Originally posted by nickgusset

Not particularly, but to be honest I haven't seen any. If you can give me examples of where this is the case, you might have an argument.

Note how I'm deliberately using the dead cat ,but what about them , technique favoured by those who want to derail a thread because a) they don't have a decent counter argument or b) in this case, because they feel uncomfortable when thinking about the way they might have treated women in the past (notice how here I've made up something that is probably completely untrue, but notice how authoritative it sounds, in order to try to obfuscate things)

Edited by nickgusset (31 Oct 2017 1.02am)

Ha ha. FYI this thread is entitled “Weinstein”.

Alert a moderator to this post

hedgehog50 Croydon 31 Oct 17 8.29am
Originally posted by Kermit8 They are but if we cross Birmingham and London off the list then across the UK they are not. So if we cross off places where black people live and only look at places where black people don't live, then they are not over represented in knife crime! You should be a detective. Edited by hedgehog50 (31 Oct 2017 8.30am) We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]
Alert a moderator to this post

hedgehog50

Croydon 31 Oct 17 8.29am

Originally posted by Kermit8

They are but if we cross Birmingham and London off the list then across the UK they are not.

So if we cross off places where black people live and only look at places where black people don't live, then they are not over represented in knife crime! You should be a detective.

Edited by hedgehog50 (31 Oct 2017 8.30am)

We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 30 of 35 < 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Weinstein.

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors