This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
CambridgeEagle Sydenham 20 Apr 17 4.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
No. It shows that Labour spent money we did not have in order to fund an ever increasing demand for health care. That cannot be a long term solution and you know it. Given I have some understanding of Economics I actually don't know that. The fundamental misunderstanding you make is that a government like that of the UK can spend money "we don't have". We're not Greece, nor could we become them. We have as much money as we want as we control our own monetary policy.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CambridgeEagle Sydenham 20 Apr 17 4.51pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Hasn't government spending increased, along with the deficit under the Coalition and Conservative governments though, which is arguably spending money they don't have, to fund a country: all despite austerity That's incorrect. It's gone down quite a lot. Also see my previous point regarding "money we don't have". Attachment: Government Spending.PNG (127.41Kb)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 20 Apr 17 4.56pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Like grammar schools you mean. Not quite, as grammar schools intake were based on academic success, not potential. In order to truly take advantage of the prospects of grammar schools you need to ensure that everyone has access to a suitable education to qualify and deal with the issues that plague inner city schools. You actually have to engage with the issues within poor and impoverished areas, that impact childrens education - Including school programs in low attainment schools aimed at getting 'the best out of the average' as well. The problem of grammar schools was the high funding of the grammar schools and the relative abandoning of the comprehensives / secondary modern. Both have to have a very active focus and means of achievement of opportunity. The average kids need skills, jobs and life chances too. Its not just about excellence, it has to be about producing functional adults out of broken areas.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 20 Apr 17 4.59pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
That's incorrect. It's gone down quite a lot. Also see my previous point regarding "money we don't have". I don't understand economics - so I'm going on reports and stories about the deficit increasing, even if spending is down. I quite agree however, that if the public want an well funded health service, then they also have to pay for it with tax and national insurance. I just happen to believe that things like Education and the Health Service, represent a very reasonable return of tax to the public and should be the priority.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 20 Apr 17 5.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
Yes, just go around parts of the north-east and see for yourself. A bit selective isn't it? There is an issue with the demise from coal mining and other industry but times change. People have to adapt. Either themselves or their children.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CambridgeEagle Sydenham 20 Apr 17 5.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
A bit selective isn't it? There is an issue with the demise from coal mining and other industry but times change. People have to adapt. Either themselves or their children. And recycle my point about lack of provision of any help from the state in the form of training/education/investment.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nest 20 Apr 17 5.07pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
A bit selective isn't it? There is an issue with the demise from coal mining and other industry but times change. People have to adapt. Either themselves or their children. Adapting without opportunity
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CambridgeEagle Sydenham 20 Apr 17 5.08pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
I don't understand economics - so I'm going on reports and stories about the deficit increasing, even if spending is down. I quite agree however, that if the public want an well funded health service, then they also have to pay for it with tax and national insurance. I just happen to believe that things like Education and the Health Service, represent a very reasonable return of tax to the public and should be the priority. Spending is only one half of the deficit. Government revenue is the other - which has suffered from tax cuts and stagnating and often reduced wages of lower and middle earners who pay most of the total tax. The government could also use QE to invest in education and health... But they don't.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
davenotamonkey 20 Apr 17 5.09pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by matt_himself
Jezza is saying he is the 'anti establishment' candidate: Glad to see that he is apeing Donald Trump and UKIP by doing this. So "anti-establishment" he's parachuting his son into a safe Labour seat. Lol.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 20 Apr 17 5.09pm | |
---|---|
I do think the regions should be devolved and have meaningful powers.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 20 Apr 17 5.13pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
Given I have some understanding of Economics I actually don't know that. The fundamental misunderstanding you make is that a government like that of the UK can spend money "we don't have". We're not Greece, nor could we become them. We have as much money as we want as we control our own monetary policy. So what is the deficit? More importantly, it is not realistic to throw money at an ever increasing problem involving a highly inefficient organisation.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CambridgeEagle Sydenham 20 Apr 17 5.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
So what is the deficit? More importantly, it is not realistic to throw money at an ever increasing problem involving a highly inefficient organisation. Deficit only relates to fiscal policy. Governments have more than one macroeconomic tool available!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.