You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Expiring Contracts
November 21 2024 4.38pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Expiring Contracts

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 3 of 5 < 1 2 3 4 5 >

  

Lazy Flag North Kent 02 Jan 24 3.23pm Send a Private Message to Lazy Add Lazy as a friend

Is it Eddie Zambezi

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
eagleman13 Flag On The Road To Hell & Alicante 02 Jan 24 3.25pm Send a Private Message to eagleman13 Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add eagleman13 as a friend

Originally posted by Lazy

Is it Eddie Zambezi

Good dat, could be Phil Mississippi.

 


This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 02 Jan 24 3.37pm Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by Nicholas91

Eh?

I'm not asking you to name names, but for an ignoramus like me, give another clue!

I wouldn't call you an ignoramus after all this is just social media gossip why would you know?

I'm not sure I can give a clue without revealing his identity and he may after all be completely innocent.

I can say it is related to a news story the other day about a player racially abusing somebody outside of work. Our player has been fingered but he knows.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Nicholas91 Flag The Democratic Republic of Kent 02 Jan 24 3.43pm Send a Private Message to Nicholas91 Add Nicholas91 as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

I wouldn't call you an ignoramus after all this is just social media gossip why would you know?

I'm not sure I can give a clue without revealing his identity and he may after all be completely innocent.

I can say it is related to a news story the other day about a player racially abusing somebody outside of work. Our player has been fingered but he knows.

Ah OK.

I'll conduct my own amateur research

 


Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ambrose7 Flag Croydon 02 Jan 24 3.50pm Send a Private Message to ambrose7 Add ambrose7 as a friend

Release - not even worth talking about

Riedewald
Ferguson

Keep

Schlupp - Perfectly good enough to be on our bench and rotate.

Keep on short deals, mostly to limit the amount of work needed in the summer/save ripping out the entire culture of the team in one go

Hughes - Perfectly fine to be on our bench and help close out games.
Matthews - Would send Whitworth out on loan for a year. Make or break for him. We could keep Goodman as third choice if we really felt a need to move Matthews on.
One right back (probably Ward due to decent injury record, captaincy indicating good character, and cover as emergency 5th CB)

Release with justification

The other right back - Clyne frees up the most cash
Tomkins - Not the player he was, but great servant. Guehi/Andersen/Richards/Holding is suitable with Ward as emergency 5th cover.

Edited by ambrose7 (02 Jan 2024 3.59pm)

 


26th January 2010 - Enter Administration
2nd May 2010 - D-Day 1 - Survival at Hillsborough
1st June 2010 - D-Day 2 - Survival at Lloyds
7th June 2010 - CPFC2010 exchange contracts.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
TheBigToePunt Flag 02 Jan 24 4.41pm Send a Private Message to TheBigToePunt Add TheBigToePunt as a friend

We have the same conversation each year about this.

When I walk around my house I see loads of stuff I am a bit bored of, or which is not top of the range. The temptation to give it away on Freecycle is significant, but unless I can afford upgrades I'm just going to be sitting there with no telly or fridge, aren't I?

I appreciate that contracts expiring can be a chance to free up some money or squad space, but it doesn't look like the 8 named players are using up a problematic amount of either.

Thats no great surprise. Our years of throwing daft money at has-beens are gone, and other than in the case of a top player choosing to run his contract down, chances are that if you are a player entering the last six months of your current deal at Palace, the club have half an idea that they could survive without you.

Almost nobody gets released by Palace and proves them wrong, so if you are on the 'contract-expiring' list, chances are there aren't many significantly better options out there for you. The players in question are better off hoping Palace need them for another year, and will have to bite the lip for a few months whilst Palace flirt with would-be replacements.

It can't be much good for the ego, but the sensible course of action for all these players is to keep their fingers crossed that Dougie and Steve can't afford and attract an upgrade. It's probably 60/40 in favour of the existing players, at least.

Whilst Palace can afford to let these contracts run down for now, I doubt that remains sensible all the way to June. Hughes, Schlupp, Clyne or Ward will start looking around if Palace don't at least start talks with them soon.

I appreciate that Real Madrid probably aren't beating a path to those players, but they do actually play in our team. I sometimes wonder if people know what that means - if they leave, we will need to replace them, with an actual top class professional footballer.

It's not a question of naming a player on the list who we think 'we can surely do better than'. Until and unless a new, replacement player is actually signed up, we haven't done better. Lose all four of those and that's probably four transfer fees you need to find, on top of the wages. Good luck getting a good striker after that.

I'd offer two-year deals on the same terms to Hughes and Schlupp, one year on the same terms to Ward, and one year on sensible money to Clyne (who surely isn't on £80k p/w these days - he signed a new one-year deal last summer). I'd consider another year for Riedewald unless the feedback from the coaching staff is that Ozoh is definitely ready to at least play 10-15 decent games a year at this level. I see no evidence so far that he is better than Reidewald, I just hope he is, which is not the same thing.

The players who seldom or never play are a different matter. Time must be up for Tomkins and Ferguson, and we have signed Holding and Richards already.

The third-choice keeper doesn't really matter I suppose. Not sure why clubs have one - they are rarely better than the best development-age goalkeeper, and you can get emergency loans outside of the transfer windows for GKs anyway.

Edited by TheBigToePunt (02 Jan 2024 4.56pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ambrose7 Flag Croydon 02 Jan 24 4.57pm Send a Private Message to ambrose7 Add ambrose7 as a friend

Originally posted by TheBigToePunt

It's not a question of naming a player on the list who we think 'we can surely do better than'. Until and unless a new, replacement player is actually signed up, we haven't done better. Lose all four of those and that's probably four transfer fees you need to find, on top of the wages. Good luck getting a good striker after that.

Yep, spot on and Doombear makes a similarly good point.

We've signed 9 players total in the past 2 years. Even in the year we went wild under Vieira, we signed 8 plus 1 loan.

The idea that we drop 7/8 of these with no transfer fee and then replace them with improvements is unrealistic, especially as not enough of the academy are banging hard on the door to take those squad spots (i.e. already regularly occupying substitute spots).

If they all go, we would at an absolute minimum need 5 replacements. Even doing that with 5x Will Hughes transfer fees is £35m and we'd likely just be back at square 1 in terms of ability.

Yes, player X who is great and on a free/cheap exists, but we'd need an unrealistically high success % in those races. We haven't demonstrated that success in recent windows.

 


26th January 2010 - Enter Administration
2nd May 2010 - D-Day 1 - Survival at Hillsborough
1st June 2010 - D-Day 2 - Survival at Lloyds
7th June 2010 - CPFC2010 exchange contracts.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Lanzo-Ad Flag Lanzarote 02 Jan 24 5.16pm Send a Private Message to Lanzo-Ad Add Lanzo-Ad as a friend

Originally posted by ambrose7

Yep, spot on and Doombear makes a similarly good point.

We've signed 9 players total in the past 2 years. Even in the year we went wild under Vieira, we signed 8 plus 1 loan.

The idea that we drop 7/8 of these with no transfer fee and then replace them with improvements is unrealistic, especially as not enough of the academy are banging hard on the door to take those squad spots (i.e. already regularly occupying substitute spots).

If they all go, we would at an absolute minimum need 5 replacements. Even doing that with 5x Will Hughes transfer fees is £35m and we'd likely just be back at square 1 in terms of ability.

Yes, player X who is great and on a free/cheap exists, but we'd need an unrealistically high success % in those races. We haven't demonstrated that success in recent windows.

Not if they are free, a new contract has a signing fee even if you stay at the same club

 


“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
TheBigToePunt Flag 02 Jan 24 5.30pm Send a Private Message to TheBigToePunt Add TheBigToePunt as a friend

Originally posted by ambrose7

Yep, spot on and Doombear makes a similarly good point.

We've signed 9 players total in the past 2 years. Even in the year we went wild under Vieira, we signed 8 plus 1 loan.

The idea that we drop 7/8 of these with no transfer fee and then replace them with improvements is unrealistic, especially as not enough of the academy are banging hard on the door to take those squad spots (i.e. already regularly occupying substitute spots).

If they all go, we would at an absolute minimum need 5 replacements. Even doing that with 5x Will Hughes transfer fees is £35m and we'd likely just be back at square 1 in terms of ability.

Yes, player X who is great and on a free/cheap exists, but we'd need an unrealistically high success % in those races. We haven't demonstrated that success in recent windows.

Yes, I am not sure what people mean when they say that an older player is 'blocking the pathway' or 'taking a spot that a youth team player could have'.

Youth team graduates (including youngsters we've bought from other clubs) don't need to be named in the 25 man squad, so they are not being blocked in that sense. We often don't use all 25 squad places anyway.

I'd be amazed if we were ever in a position where we couldn't afford to offer a youth team player a pro contract because we had spent so much on the senior players, so Ward, Clyne and Schlupp aren't blocking a youth team players chances in that respect, either.

The only way in which losing half a dozen senior pros would help a youth team player is that competition would be removed from their paths. At times of widespread injuries and suspensions, your youth team lads simply have to play.

Is that really what we want?! It wouldn't make the youth team player any better than he was, and certainly not make him good enough if he wasn't already.

If Ozoh, Boetang (or whoever) are going to be good enough to improve our side, then they should already be setting their sights on replacing Schlupp or Hughes. The presence of decent, but not spectacular, senior pros is the first filter in the sift to find youth team players who are going to make it at Palace.

Ward, Clyne, Ayew... they are the 'low hanging fruit' of the squad, in that a new player (be it a youth team graduate or a new signing) has, as his first mission, to get ahead of them in the pecking order. If the new man can do that, then he can set his sights on surpassing the next level of player. Most can't complete that first mission, but that's all the more reason to have good journeyman pro's in the squad - they are a good yardstick for youth graduates.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Painter Flag Croydon 02 Jan 24 5.32pm Send a Private Message to Painter Add Painter as a friend

Originally posted by Nicholas91

Will Hughes (£35,000) - - Wouldn't cry but not keen to offload either.
Jeffrey Schlupp (£50,000) - I'd keep.
Jairo Riedewald (£55,000) - Been here long enough with barely any impact. Like him on a personal level but for financial/footballing reasons would be pleased to see him go.
Nathaniel Clyne (£80,000) - Paid far too much, would happily keep at much lower price but would rather a new, suitable RB altogether.
Joel Ward (£35,000) - Great guy, perhaps legendary status, but past it for some time now. Needs to go.
Nathan Ferguson (£25,000) - Who?
James Tomkins (£50,000) - Well past it, can go. Underrated in terms of value to us though, think he has been/was a great signing. Felt as though we had WHU over there.
Remi Matthews (£5,385) - At that price, I'd keep him for now.

I dont get why people think Clyne is on £80k a week, a litle research shows it to be nowhere near that.

Nathaniel Clyne earns £29,000 per week, £1,508,000 per year playing for Crystal Palace as a D/WB RL. Nathaniel Clyne's net worth is £26,312,000. Nathaniel Clyne is 32 years old and was born in England. His current contract expires June 30, 2024.

At £29k a week, he is good value.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
TheBigToePunt Flag 02 Jan 24 5.33pm Send a Private Message to TheBigToePunt Add TheBigToePunt as a friend

Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad

Not if they are free, a new contract has a signing fee even if you stay at the same club

Not always Lanzo. In any event, a new free-transfer signing is no less likely to want a signing-on fee, so the point stands even if Palace could somehow secure four or five free transfers who were better than the lads on the list.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 02 Jan 24 5.36pm Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by TheBigToePunt

Yes, I am not sure what people mean when they say that an older player is 'blocking the pathway' or 'taking a spot that a youth team player could have'.

Charlton fans are up in arms at their teams poor performance. One of the performance metrics that the current under siege manager is being assessed on by the board is the number of first team games that academy players get.

The fans believe this has led to the manager picking youngsters to meet that target even though there are better established players in the squad. Whatever the truth it's not working as their league position indicates.

So yes I take your point. However the FA cup will be a litmus test, we should be resting Olise to protect him and giving Franca and Ozoh a chance. If Roy doesn't do that then I suggest he is being stubborn.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 3 of 5 < 1 2 3 4 5 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Expiring Contracts