This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Lucy Letby trial
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 Stirlingsays  08 Aug 23 5.37pm |
   |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Part Time James
Back in the old days of this forum 9 or 10 blokes would have commented "would" by now. I applaud you all for progressing away from the misogyny that used to be rife on this site. How dare you accuse us of not being misogynists! I've never been so offen.....oh look at the t1ts on that.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
Attachment: ASCPFC  Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 08 Aug 23 7.07pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Part Time James
Back in the old days of this forum 9 or 10 blokes would have commented "would" by now. I applaud you all for progressing away from the misogyny that used to be rife on this site. Cucking doesn't post as much these days. In general, it goes without saying anyway.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Phil’s Barber Crowborough 09 Aug 23 12.56pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by YT
Who is 'they'? Yes, what a bizarre thing to say: The correct outcome is all I am interested in and the Unanimous or Majority verdict system of trial by jury is the tried and tested bedrock of this.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Forest Hillbilly  in a hidey-hole 09 Aug 23 8.43pm |
|
|---|---|
|
wood I think the jurors must be in a plush hotel with food and drink laid on. No wonder they're not in a hurry to conclude. Seriously, the outcome is going to have to be pulled from the jurors. If no decision can be made, is the Judge still able to preside ? or would it all go to re-trial. ? It's like trying to watch a discussion on the Politics forum where everyone comes to the table with an entrenched position, and no-one is budging.
I disengage, I turn the page. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
cryrst  The garden of England 10 Aug 23 5.43am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly
wood I think the jurors must be in a plush hotel with food and drink laid on. No wonder they're not in a hurry to conclude. Seriously, the outcome is going to have to be pulled from the jurors. If no decision can be made, is the Judge still able to preside ? or would it all go to re-trial. ? It's like trying to watch a discussion on the Politics forum where everyone comes to the table with an entrenched position, and no-one is budging. How many babies did she allegedly kill and how is it so hard to find the evidence.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Mapletree Croydon 10 Aug 23 8.16am |
|
|---|---|
|
She is accused of killing 7 babies. Don't they have Google where you live? Nobody knows how many babies she could have affected Because she was a 12 years experienced nurse and likely had a mental health problem effectively making her a sociopath it would seem she would know how to do what she wanted without leaving evidence Edited by Mapletree (10 Aug 2023 8.16am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| steeleye20 Croydon 10 Aug 23 9.26am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
She is accused of killing 7 babies. Don't they have Google where you live? Nobody knows how many babies she could have affected Because she was a 12 years experienced nurse and likely had a mental health problem effectively making her a sociopath it would seem she would know how to do what she wanted without leaving evidence Edited by Mapletree (10 Aug 2023 8.16am) Its easy to see how serious mistakes have been, and still are,in the case of Andrew Malkinson last week served 20 years for basic blunders of assumption, being made without any real evidence, a flawed direction to the jury and withheld evidence. The jury, now minus 2, have served their prison sentence nearly 1 year. This should not have been allowed to go on so long, it is not natural, the jury should have been discharged and the case reviewed.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 10 Aug 23 9.37am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Its easy to see how serious mistakes have been, and still are,in the case of Andrew Malkinson last week served 20 years for basic blunders of assumption, being made without any real evidence, a flawed direction to the jury and withheld evidence. The jury, now minus 2, have served their prison sentence nearly 1 year.
We don't know what the issue for the jury is. They have been asked to bring verdicts on multiple charges so it is possible that they have agreed verdicts on all but one or on some and not others. I would imagine the judge is keen to have verdicts on all but he may well be forced to accept that they cannot decide on all charges. If that is the case and the judge accepts that then the CPP will have to decide if it is worth retrying the charges where the jury is hung.
One more point |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| cryrst The garden of England 10 Aug 23 11.25am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
She is accused of killing 7 babies. Don't they have Google where you live? Nobody knows how many babies she could have affected Because she was a 12 years experienced nurse and likely had a mental health problem effectively making her a sociopath it would seem she would know how to do what she wanted without leaving evidence Edited by Mapletree (10 Aug 2023 8.16am) Tbh. Couldn’t be bothered. This is too long a case and she will appeal anyway if it’s a guilty verdict. You sound like you’ve made your mind up so not worth discussing any more !
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Mapletree Croydon 10 Aug 23 11.56am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
Tbh. Couldn’t be bothered. This is too long a case and she will appeal anyway if it’s a guilty verdict. You sound like you’ve made your mind up so not worth discussing any more ! Likely but not proven I said likely as there will be a reason she is currently in Court. We shall see what the jury finds.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 georgenorman 18 Aug 23 2.07pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Found guilty.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickyf 18 Aug 23 2.28pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by georgenorman
Found guilty.
Rip to the poor babies who died and condolences to the families affected
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.